Lions draft thread.A Collingwood poster said,100% that the lions will either pick Brayshaw or Rayner.
UDL at pick 2 to us will make my Friday afternoon
UDL at pick 2 to us will make my Friday afternoon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

I'm not sure why LDU at pick 1 is out of the question. What you see is what you get, I feel like he's a safer bet than Rayner and physically more ready for AFL next year than Brayshaw. Still, if he drops to us at pick 2, I'll be over the moon. I hope he takes Lachie Weller's number 14 (as a constant reminder of Lloyd's masterstroke)Lions draft thread.A Collingwood poster said,100% that the lions will either pick Brayshaw or Rayner.
UDL at pick 2 to us will make my Friday afternoon
I rewatched some Freo games during the week. It's no surprise that our forwardline was the main weakness. Picking 2 'pure midfielders' would be nice, but using a pick on a mid/forward would be ideal. I think we need to get one of Rayner/Stephenson/Fog to add some firepower, and an LDU/Dow/Brayshaw for some more F50 entriesIf Freo pick LDU at 2 I then hope our next pick adds some flexibility to the list. A forward or back. So Fogarty would be my pick if available or Naughton.
LDU and Brayshaw won't add much flexibility when you already have Neale, Fyfe, Mundy and Blakely as mids.
Mundy will retire in a few years time so LDU makes sense. Fog could play forward and then give Fyfe some time in the forward line.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Lions draft thread.A Collingwood poster said,100% that the lions will either pick Brayshaw or Rayner.
UDL at pick 2 to us will make my Friday afternoon
I’d prefer he doesn’t. It’s a shit way for him to have his career defined.I hope he takes Lachie Weller's number 14 (as a constant reminder of Lloyd's masterstroke)
Nothing wrong with Naughton or Brander. I believe that the top 5-6 standout are a level above the rest and all are midfielders. Stephenson is part of that 6 but his heart thing has clouded that a little.What's wrong with Naughton
I am not sure you can compare rieldwolt /A.Rance with Martin, crotchin in term of talent . They all around the same level but contribute evenly across forward,mid , Defense .Nothing wrong with Naughton or Brander. I believe that the top 5-6 standout are a level above the rest and all are midfielders. Stephenson is part of that 6 but his heart thing has clouded that a little.
Naughton will be a long term player and a very good one at that. He sounds like he is willing Collingwood to take him. The Age ran an article yesterday/Friday that broke up the lists by position. Collingwood had two KPD players - one I had never even heard of. Freo had heaps of KPD and that didn’t even incl. Cox who was listed with the KPF.
As such Collingwood may reach (only slightly) to pick Naughton but for us we need to go the the best two available at 2 and 5 and both (my opinion only) will be midfielders.
I agree. Unless we don't rate them, pick 1 pure mid, 1 forward/ mid makes perfect senseI rewatched some Freo games during the week. It's no surprise that our forwardline was the main weakness. Picking 2 'pure midfielders' would be nice, but using a pick on a mid/forward would be ideal. I think we need to get one of Rayner/Stephenson/Fog to add some firepower, and an LDU/Dow/Brayshaw for some more F50 entries
I’d prefer he doesn’t. It’s a shit way for him to have his career defined.
So you went from having;I changed my votes Ldu and brayshaw from ldu and Fogarty. It could be just the hype around brayshaw got to me but I guess we will soon find out. Happy with Fogarty and Rayner if either of ldu and brayshaw gone though followed by Dow
What a Grouch.Grover dislikes your remark.
By 'he takes' I mean LDU chooses to take the number, not that it's forced upon him.I’d prefer he doesn’t. It’s a shit way for him to have his career defined.
3 Darcy’s are better than 2One mid/fwd from the two picks and back Darcy Tucker in as a full-time mid (or as close as you can get in this era of multipositional footy) from next year
I don't think I can do two polls at once.
Pls, pls, pls, pls, pls.
So you went from having;
1 mid + 1 forward/mid (LDU and Fogarty)
to
2 pure mids (LDU and Brayshaw)
but would be happy with
2 forward/mids (Fogarty and Rayner)
How would you feel about Haynes and Brander?
For what my opinion is worth, the forward/mid option is the gutsy move, and as well as Fogarty and Rayner, Stephenson needs to be considered. With a battery of rolling forward/mids we could begin to manufacture a structure that only requires a mug KPF to be a target, compete and get the ball to ground. I am thinking we can do that easily with Cox, Apeness, Strnadica or Taberner. But no harm drafting Kruger or Miller (my preferred).
For quality, a swarming group of Fyfe, Bennell, Walters, Rayner/Stephenson/Fogarty would be a nightmare.





