- Joined
- Nov 7, 2010
- Posts
- 28,425
- Reaction score
- 39,242
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- WADA
Big Esteva? put a Nathan Ablett mask on him and have Gaz feeding him.Black, Crameri or Stanley.
With that it then doesn’t matter, our season is cooked.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Big Esteva? put a Nathan Ablett mask on him and have Gaz feeding him.Black, Crameri or Stanley.
With that it then doesn’t matter, our season is cooked.
https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/is-harry-taylor-now-geelongs-most-important-player.1120449/This is not about me not respecting Hawkins- I love him, but I have seen Taylor be an adequate replacement. I am saying without Taylor, we would be as poorly off as without Hawk. Those mop up guys in defence you named are not fit to tie Harry's bootlaces. Without Mackie, Domsy Harry becomes the critical KB even moreso. Hendo is fine as BACKUP. The others are unproven.
Harry can play beautifully as a KF.
Totally the opposite; Taylor could and has replaced Hawkins like last year, but this year we have NO REPLACEMENT for Harry.You're saying Taylor could replace Hawkins yet at the same time admitting we have Taylor's replacement down back.
It's a contradiction.
No he couldn't have mate.Totally the opposite; Taylor could and has replaced Hawkins like last year, but this year we have NO REPLACEMENT for Harry.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
if we are doing drive by's..You were both on the Mitch Brown bandwagon when he was obviously a spud,clueless the both of you.

Pity we never used him to his full potential.No it really isn't arguable at all.
It's really not up for debate.
Hawkins by the length of Flemington is our most important player.
Short memory? Did you see Harry towel up Rance when Tigers LOST their last game for 2017?No he couldn't have mate.
We all get them wrong Daz.if we are doing drive by's..
I need a few rounds for Eardley, Brown and Kersten.
GO Catters
Short memory? Did you see Harry towel up Rance when Tigers LOST their last game for 2017?
One game, yes.
Did you see Harry nearly get us close to Adelaide with one Q of footy last year?
Strangely can't recall that one...Did you see what Rance did to Taylor in the finals a few weeks later? He's still got the scars.
Strangely can't recall that one...
I liken you to BILL COLLINS- THE ACCURATE ONE. Hope that's a compliment- it is meant to be. I doubt there is ever a statement that you make or refute that is not 100% accurate.
I don't really care what Champion Data says. Our most valuable players when healthy in order are:
1. Danger
2. Ablett
3. Selwood
4. Duncan
5. Hawkins
6. Taylor
7. Henderson
With the far gap to the rest. Menegola to me is in the rest category but in the upper end of it. Not even close to a drop candidate, similar level to Touhy IMO.
Let's hope we don't need to find out. Nice to have such potent bookends, with the MF doing ok as well when all assembled.I don't dispute Taylor was able to do a job from time to time. I don't think he's capable of kicking 50 goals a year as a key forward though.
And I do think we have replacements for Taylor who could fill in. Henderson is the obvious one. I'm not sure we have anyone who can cover for Hawkins.
Warrants a new thread: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/who-is-our-most-important-player-in-2018.1188994/https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/is-harry-taylor-now-geelongs-most-important-player.1120449/
Bobby asked that question a while back. Hawkins was deemed the most important hansomly. Wonder if catempire reset the poll would we see a different consensus reached. I don’t think we would
Your first mistake is the word "next". I haven't made any predictions of any champs. I'll leave that to others. I absolutely thought Horlin-Smith showed promise and could become a good player. Just as I have with others. If you wanted to make it funnier - and more accurate - my two most spectacular failures were Tenace and Gardiner. I would imagine there may be more. Right now I'm thinking Kelly shows a fair bit of promise. Could be right, could be wrong.
As you brought up it, if I wanted a real laugh, I'd read your finals predictions from last year. How much were we going to beat Richmond by again? That level of insight leaves one in awe.
I was never on Mitch brown.You were both on the Mitch Brown bandwagon when he was obviously a spud,clueless the both of you.
Blah blah blah. Wht a windbag you really are. Let me know if you want Brian cooks email address. I’m sure he’d love to connect with someone who knows more than a premiership winning senior coach. You make me laugh little man.
B: Joel Selwood - Harry Taylor - Jed Bews
HB: Tom Stewart - Lachie Henderson - Zach Tuohy
C: Patrick Dangerfield - Nakia Cockatoo - Scott Selwood
HF: Stewart Crameri - Tim Kelly - Brandan Parfitt
F: Mark 'kick at the sticks' Blicavs - Tom Hawkins - Lincoln McCarthy
Foll: Zac Smith - Mitch Duncan - Gary Ablett
I/C: Wylie Buzza, Cam Guthrie, Jackson Thurlow, Jake Kolodjashnij
Em: Sam Menegola, Zach Guthrie, James Parsons, Daniel Menzel
Need to have the disposal liabilities as far apart as possible![]()

So we've got injury problems but is anybody else really excited about our possible best team this year? With Kelly and Parfitt being revelations, Ablett coming in and Ratugolea being a real competitor it feels like some of our weaknesses are turning around. For the last couple of years we've struggled for real quality outside our top 10 or so players but it looks to me like we could bat way deeper this year once we get players back. Our best team is likely to be something like:
Defence - Kolo, Henderson, Taylor, Bews, Guthrie, Stewart and Thuoy. That looks really solid to me and a good mix of defensive and rebounding capabilities.
Midfield - Ablett, J Selwood, Dangerfield, Kelly, Duncan, S Selwood, Blicavs, 1x ruck.
Mid-Forward - Menegola, Parfitt, Cockatoo.
Forward - Hawkins, Menzel.
That's 20 players right there and I think everybody on that lists would be comfortably best 22 in any team in the league apart from whichever ruck we pick (our only obvious weakness). It might be a strange thing to say when we're sitting at 2-2 but I reckon we have the potential to be significantly better than the last few years. Chris Scott has said something along the lines of "our best is very good" a lot in the last few years but there were always question marks about the players 10-20 or so on our list and whether they could produce a month of quality football during finals. This year through improvement in mid-tier players (Parfitt, Stewart, Menzel, Kolo, etc) and a couple of good inclusions (Ablett and Kelly) I'm actually confident that our best actually could be good enough. That makes the next month essential to just get wins however we can while hopefully our list returns to fitness. If we can be in striking distance of top 4 by round 12 or so with players coming back I'll be quietly confident in this squad to do something special.
Our best team is likely to be something like:
Defence - Kolo, Henderson, Taylor, Bews, Guthrie, Stewart and Thuoy. That looks really solid to me and a good mix of defensive and rebounding capabilities.
Midfield - Ablett, J Selwood, Dangerfield, Kelly, Duncan, S Selwood, Blicavs, 1x ruck.
Mid-Forward - Menegola, Parfitt, Cockatoo.
Forward - Hawkins, Menzel.
That's 20 players right there
Good post, as much as I like McCarthy, I reckon Fogarty is ahead now... Bigger, get's more of the pill, and has the Joel Selwood like attack on the pill. Hungry.I have the same 20 players in my best 22, as well as Crameri and McCarthy. The team looks like this:
B: Bews Taylor Kolo
HB: Tuohy Henderson Stewart
C: Duncan Ablett SSelwood
HF: Menegola Menzel Cockatoo
F: Crameri** Hawkins McCarthy
R: Sminley* Dangerfield JSelwood
I: Blicavs CGuthrie Kelly Parfitt
* Smith and Stanley have not shined this year. At the time of writing I'd probably say Stanley can be the ruck, but if he plays a string of bad games then Smith is the obvious option.
** If someone from outside the above 22 players puts together a string of solid performances (eg. Kelly, Parfitt), then they could replace Crameri in the 22. Menzel and Hawkins can be the two key forwards, so no real need for Crameri.
*** Due to the good form of Kelly and Parfitt, I haven't been able to find a spot for Horlin-Smith. Sorry George.