Play Nice 45th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 4 (cont in pt 5)

[Satan]

Also I'm betting they don't want to mention Cohen has dropped his fusion GPS lawsuit over his claim the dossier is fake.

Try msg 9442

 

[Satan]

This could be why.

Twitter Wonders Why House Republicans Pushed For Release of Comey Memos: Nunes ‘Is An Imbecile’



https://www.mediaite.com/online/twi...-release-of-comey-memos-nunes-is-an-imbecile/

Comey must have followed Tania Hird idea of taking contemperous notes .

 

[floodbuster]

Try msg 9442

This thread moves at a rapid rate.

 

[Satan]

This thread moves at a rapid rate.

Thats why you use the ignore feature to ignore the crap and read my silk posts

 

[Happy Mastenator]

Comey must have followed Tania Hird idea of taking contemperous notes .

It's not Tanias idea, it's a practice lawyers use for situations where they need to.

More importantly his memos were sent to himself to prove the contemporaneous nature of the notes.

 

[GuruJane]

Replying to random comments is not stalking, referenceing someone multiple times is.

Accusing a poster here of stalking amounts to personal abuse floodbuster given that "trolling" is the recognised term for the internet.

fyi floodbuster much as I search can only find myself "referencing " Maggie 16 times in this thread since Jan 27.
By contrast I have referenced you 21 times since April
and Mastenator 53 times since December.
The disparity numbers don't surprise me - I don't rate Mags all that highly.
Suggest you stop falling for that "damsel in distress" rescue stuff , go back to exercising the brain cells.

 

[floodbuster]

By contrast I have referenced you 21 times since April

Well, maybe I like stalkers.

What got my back up is the insinuation that she wants NK to drop nukes just to prove you wrong.


That meme was generalised and you made it personal.

 

[floodbuster]

Damn mobile phone

 

[Satan]

It's not Tanias idea, it's a practice lawyers use for situations where they need to.

More importantly his memos were sent to himself to prove the contemporaneous nature of the notes.

I was being facetious about Tania and saving Jimmys hide

I understand why he wrote them , so his memory could not be faulted by others

 

[Ripper]

Trumpeters going very quiet on the content of the Coomey memos

Still trying to work out what was in them that caused a SC to be appointed.

 

[Maggie5]

Accusing a poster here of stalking amounts to personal abuse floodbuster given that "trolling" is the recognised term for the internet.

fyi floodbuster much as I search can only find myself "referencing " Maggie 16 times in this thread since Jan 27.
By contrast I have referenced you 21 times since April
and Mastenator 53 times since December.
The disparity numbers don't surprise me - I don't rate Mags all that highly.
Suggest you stop falling for that "damsel in distress" rescue stuff , go back to exercising the brain cells.

Suggest that you stop tagging me in unrelated posts, that would be a good start as I do see it as stalking. Yes I am accusing you! Report me!

I have more than once suggested you do not reply as I don't hold you an any way a decent poster yet you persist! Please stop!

 

[Ripper]

I can't argue with any of that.

------------------------------------------------------
Washington, D.C. – Today House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes (R-Ca.), House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) issued the following statement:




“We have long argued former Director Comey’s self-styled memos should be in the public domain, subject to any classification redactions. These memos are significant for both what is in them and what is not.

Former Director Comey’s memos show the President made clear he wanted allegations of collusion, coordination, and conspiracy between his campaign and Russia fully investigated. The memos also made clear the ‘cloud’ President Trump wanted lifted was not the Russian interference in the 2016 election cloud, rather it was the salacious, unsubstantiated allegations related to personal conduct leveled in the dossier.


The memos also show former Director Comey never wrote that he felt obstructed or threatened. While former Director Comey went to great lengths to set dining room scenes, discuss height requirements, describe the multiple times he felt complimented, and myriad other extraneous facts, he never once mentioned the most relevant fact of all, which was whether he felt obstructed in his investigation.

The memos also make certain what has become increasingly clear of late: former Director Comey has at least two different standards in his interactions with others. He chose not to memorialize conversations with President Obama, Attorney General Lynch, Secretary Clinton, Andrew McCabe or others, but he immediately began to memorialize conversations with President Trump. It is significant former Director Comey made no effort to memorialize conversations with former Attorney General Lynch despite concerns apparently significant enough to warrant his unprecedented appropriation of the charging decision away from her and the Department of Justice in July of 2016.

These memos also lay bare the notion that former Director Comey is not motivated by animus. He was willing to work for someone he deemed morally unsuited for office, capable of lying, requiring of personal loyalty, worthy of impeachment, and sharing the traits of a mob boss. Former Director Comey was willing to overlook all of the aforementioned characteristics in order to keep his job. In his eyes, the real crime was his own firing.

The memos show Comey was blind to biases within the FBI and had terrible judgment with respect to his deputy Andrew McCabe. On multiple occasions he, in his own words, defended the character of McCabe after President Trump questioned McCabe.

Finally, former Director Comey leaked at least one of these memos for the stated purpose of spurring the appointment of Special Counsel, yet he took no steps to spur the appointment of Special Counsel when he had significant concerns about the objectivity of the Department of Justice under Attorney General Loretta Lynch.


As we have consistently said, rather than making a criminal case for obstruction or interference with an ongoing investigation, these memos would be Defense Exhibit A should such a charge be made.” (link)

 

[Maggie5]

This is the sort of reply I would expect from the RW media/Rep when they got the memos and found they have nothing.

 

[Elroo]

Accusing a poster here of stalking amounts to personal abuse floodbuster given that "trolling" is the recognised term for the internet.

fyi floodbuster much as I search can only find myself "referencing " Maggie 16 times in this thread since Jan 27.
By contrast I have referenced you 21 times since April
and Mastenator 53 times since December.
The disparity numbers don't surprise me - I don't rate Mags all that highly.
Suggest you stop falling for that "damsel in distress" rescue stuff , go back to exercising the brain cells.

Not as highly as you rated Obama's golf during his time as President, whilst Trumps doesn't seem to interest you!

 

[Ripper]

This is the sort of reply I would expect from the RW media/Rep when they got the memos and found they have nothing.

That leaves the question of why the SC was appointed , remember it was supposedly Comey's memo's that caused it.

 

[Maggie5]

That leaves the question of why the SC was appointed , remember it was supposedly Comey's memo's that caused it.

From what I have seen from his interviews, there isn't anything in those memos that hasn't been known. So Nunes has produced another 'nothing burger'.

 

[JeffDunne]

From what I have seen from his interviews, there isn't anything in those memos that hasn't been known. So Nunes has produced another 'nothing burger'.

The idiots still cannot see the cons they continue to fall for.

What's the bet tomorrow Republicans shift their focus onto something else, that when released, will prove everything they're saying and completely exonerates the president?

They've been using the same tactic ever since Republicans took control of Congress - 7 years ago! And the brainless conservative punter still falls for it.

 

[Brunswick Trap King]

I watched the Netflix documentary about Roger Stone last night.

For all of this obvious flaws, his terrible actions, his lack of morality and everything else you can say about him, I did find him pretty entertaining. He really has a degree of showmanship that makes you want to watch.

 

[GuruJane]

Well, maybe I like stalkers.

What got my back up is the insinuation that she wants NK to drop nukes just to prove you wrong.
That meme was generalised and you made it personal.

Oh come off it. A few pages back Maggie posted a big photo of deadbeat hillbillies and captioned it "Trump Supporters" - this is in the middle of her joshing with the resident Trumpers here -. she loves dishing it out but not the other way. And did they boo hoo???
You'll notice her response to moi is "I accuse - report me!" as though the Trump thread is the lower second at St Clare's.
Still, on second thoughts .....

 

[Werewolf]

You Mod the conspiracy board and the science thread? While pushing clearly BS conspiracies? Yikes.

Only one of us has completed a PhD in Physics. And how awkward would it be if you turned out to be wrong?

 

[floodbuster]

Only one of us has completed a PhD in Physics.

"Facepalm"

 

[Ratts of Tobruk]

Only one of us has completed a PhD in Physics. And how awkward would it be if you turned out to be wrong?

I won't be wrong. Your PhD in Physics has given you zero ability to detect obvious bullsh*t. That is hardly surprising as physics is not related to analysing human communication. It is more of a shame that it hasn't taught you that studying one field of study may not give you any expertise on unrelated fields of study. That should be something you can extrapolate, especially with how specific they often make PhDs.

The comment you quoted (below) is said obvious bullsh*t. Yet you believe it's from an "anonymous FBI source" who might be right. #facepalm

Trump has donated to the Clinton Foundation in the past, though for fairly innocuous things like building permits and such. He is smart, so his tracks are covered well. But if any prosecutor wants to go very in-depth Trump would be brought on bribery charges. He could easily get out of them, but he would be charged nonetheless.

 

[Lebbo73]

No, commiting a crime makes you a crim like racial discrimination, laundering money (his fathers) through his casino or setting up a fraudulent University.

Luckily for him bankruptcy means washing you hands of responsibilities instead of what it means here and the ability to settle out of court to ensure no guilty verdict is recorded.

You obviously know sfa about the US Justice System. None of these were criminal charges, only civil cases. These cases are pretty hard to defend against so the rich will just pay money to make it go away instead of fighting an expensive case against someone who is given free legals.
Your first paragraph comes across as a person who is keen to slander someone. Any proof?

 

[Lebbo73]

A few anonymous sources there. Surely that is not enough to believe as true?

I come across so many similar sources, but still have doubt. I may post but more often than not as either something to consider but other times as a joke.

My preference is to believe more of what I see and hear than what I read.

His sources might be anonymous but you accuse Trump of Russian collusion when there has been no evidence released to the public so far!

 

[Maggie5]

His sources might be anonymous but you accuse Trump of Russian collusion when there has been no evidence released to the public so far!

Collusion is not a crime.

Maybe you should brush up on US justice system?