Id like to test the theory.. Get TK to sign for 3 years and lets see if talk go quiet.Ffs is this kelly talk going to continue for the next few years? No doubt it’ll start up again when he signs a new contract with us in the future.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Id like to test the theory.. Get TK to sign for 3 years and lets see if talk go quiet.Ffs is this kelly talk going to continue for the next few years? No doubt it’ll start up again when he signs a new contract with us in the future.
4 rounds into a season ... a debut season. It reeks of desperation.Really? Why?
4 rounds into a season ... a debut season. It reeks of desperation.
They had their chance and now they're publically in regret mode.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Here are some post on Freo Fans on Tim Kelly
His partner doesn't like Geelong, hasn't settled in and desperately needs family support, he'll be playing with the Eagles as soon as he can.
Heard from an inside sauce Tundra? Not that it's all that surprising. Cant imagine Geelong will care that much. Will get two quality years out of him and upgrade a draft pick
Oh i agree Turbo... I thought id just post them and show our fans what there all sayingThere are a lot of posts that balance between Freo trying to get him .and perhaps who do we least want to help Geelong or WC..
P7 for Kelly and P13 was looked upon as being fair and reasonable . 6 spots in the draft for Kelly. Personally Id say no
Gaff for Kelly. No ..just from sc pov ..I doubt it works. ..dont forget we were only a couple of slabs away from busting the cap. Kelly is on min wage. Gaff will be on big , big dollars.
Whatever. We will see what pans out..but I cant see us agreeing to trade a 1st year player that looks so good for a box of jax crackers.
There are a lot of posts that balance between Freo trying to get him .and perhaps who do we least want to help Geelong or WC..
P7 for Kelly and P13 was looked upon as being fair and reasonable . 6 spots in the draft for Kelly. Personally Id say no
Gaff for Kelly. No ..just from sc pov ..I doubt it works. ..dont forget we were only a couple of slabs away from busting the cap. Kelly is on min wage. Gaff will be on big , big dollars.
Whatever. We will see what pans out..but I cant see us agreeing to trade a 1st year player that looks so good for a box of jax crackers.
I doubt we have that sort of space in our cap...Id rather McGovern than Gaff if Kelly wants to leave, lets play hardball.
His partner doesn't like Geelong, hasn't settled in and desperately needs family support, he'll be playing with the Eagles as soon as he can.
1. she has just had 2 babies with no support networkhmm, I heard something similar a day or so before the SEN article, can't vouch for the credibility at all though.
don't disagree with any of that and I'm personally really confident that he'll stay (for all the reasons stated over the last few pages), just thought it was worth mentioning that what I'd heard recently wound up being echoed on the freo board a few days later.1. she has just had 2 babies with no support network
2. they have just moved state
3. he is now home less, as he is a professional footballer
4. she has no do more with the kids
Why would she not be 100% at the moment
- FACT he played his worst game in WA this year
- FACT the eagles didnt want him, when they could have had him
- WELLS should be sacked if he considers trading him for less than he cost on exposed form
- ANYWAY time to move on, we will not be trading him for Gaff, unless the deal is, eagles dont match gaff bid, and we trade kelly for pick 22 (as Kelly wants to go home), as we are too gutless to push teams on trades, and free agents
Chances are he'd rather a 2-year contract and back himself to be worth more when he is then coming out of contract, rather them locking himself in on a deal that may well work out to be unders in 3 yearsSurely we can offer him 5 years if Blicavs is worthy of 5.
don't disagree with any of that and I'm personally really confident that he'll stay (for all the reasons stated over the last few pages), just thought it was worth mentioning that what I'd heard recently wound up being echoed on the freo board a few days later.
I kinda figured that was hyperbole, it would be a bad outcome for us but no, not worth sacking wells overwell I do... Wells should not be sacked on the basis of one deal ..no matter what.
1. she has just had 2 babies with no support network
2. they have just moved state
3. he is now home less, as he is a professional footballer
4. she has no do more with the kids
Why would she not be 100% at the moment
- FACT he played his worst game in WA this year
- FACT the eagles didnt want him, when they could have had him
- WELLS should be sacked if he considers trading him for less than he cost on exposed form
- ANYWAY time to move on, we will not be trading him for Gaff, unless the deal is, eagles dont match gaff bid, and we trade kelly for pick 22 (as Kelly wants to go home), as we are too gutless to push teams on trades, and free agents
I doubt we have that sort of space in our cap...
And we do for Gaff? Pretty sure he would be on a pretty penny too
GOLD Coast's NEAFL team did not kick a goal in its clash against Brisbane on Saturday despite featuring 11 senior listed players.
Forward Peter Wright and defender Kade Kolodjashnij were among the names to feature for the Suns outfit that was comprehensively smashed by the Lions at Burpengary, 12.24 (96) to 0.4 (4).
The Suns came into the clash with a 3-2 record while Brisbane had been 3-1.
Among those 11 on Gold Coast's list, five were former first-round picks.
Of that group, only Wil Powell was selected outside the top-10 – he went at No.19 last year.
That side had 11 or so AFL listed players in it as well.I'm thinking its a pass on GC players looking to get out - a result like that doesn't exactly sell an opposition on the benefit of trying to trade them in or give them a second chance.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-05-12/goalless-suns-hit-a-new-neafl-low
I'm thinking its a pass on GC players looking to get out - a result like that doesn't exactly sell an opposition on the benefit of trying to trade them in or give them a second chance.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-05-12/goalless-suns-hit-a-new-neafl-low

There are a lot of posts that balance between Freo trying to get him .and perhaps who do we least want to help Geelong or WC..
P7 for Kelly and P13 was looked upon as being fair and reasonable . 6 spots in the draft for Kelly. Personally Id say no
Gaff for Kelly. No ..just from sc pov ..I doubt it works. ..dont forget we were only a couple of slabs away from busting the cap. Kelly is on min wage. Gaff will be on big , big dollars.
Whatever. We will see what pans out..but I cant see us agreeing to trade a 1st year player that looks so good for a box of jax crackers.


