In order to have a sensible debate, you must have a sensible topic.Why?
Can't we have a sensible discussion/debate on the topic?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In order to have a sensible debate, you must have a sensible topic.Why?
Can't we have a sensible discussion/debate on the topic?
And nothing to do with their front running mids? Who cant defend the other way....man, have a real good lookGeelong are clearly limited in the forward line. That is the problem in a nutshell.
And everyone knows Richmonds forward line is the best in the comp, right? We have 1 tall.Geelong are clearly limited in the forward line. That is the problem in a nutshell.
Your game is numbers if you play midfield and only midfield.And shows you dont understand Cotchins game isnt about disposal numbers. Have you watched any Richmond footy in the last 2 years?
Maybe start this thread when he has a 7 touch game thenYour game is numbers if you play midfield and only midfield.
Hypothetically if had a 7 touch game but as long as he had tackles, pressure acts, 1%'ers etc......everything is good?
I don't think so.
Your game is numbers if you play midfield and only midfield.
Hypothetically if had a 7 touch game but as long as he had tackles, pressure acts, 1%'ers etc......everything is good?
I don't think so.
He didnt tho, did he? Theres a difference between barely touching the ball and having 19 touches.Your game is numbers if you play midfield and only midfield.
Hypothetically if had a 7 touch game but as long as he had tackles, pressure acts, 1%'ers etc......everything is good?
I don't think so.
Each comment you write just gets dumber and dumber. Seriously dude.The entire Richmond trademark is built on pressure acts as their game plan is built upon the curious notion of not actually gaining first possession (as highlighted by those midfield stats).
IMO, this runs contrary to the spirit of the sport. It's "seagull" football. Harass an opposition that earns first possession, then all bolt off when the hot chip has been secured.
The thread does actually have merit.
The opposition mids had a complete picnic.
View attachment 537488
WTF is this hypothetical crap........Delete thread, this discussion has no merit, and I really dont know why I'm wasting my time responding to this "Hypothetical crap"Your game is numbers if you play midfield and only midfield.
Hypothetically if he had a 7 touch game but as long as he had tackles, pressure acts, 1%'ers etc......everything is good?
I don't think so.
Probably Richmond's best midfielder, easily their best contested midfielder.
But the following numbers for the past month don't make for good reading for a player who isn't getting tagged....
The thread does actually have merit.
The opposition mids had a complete picnic.
View attachment 537488
If possession numbers were the be all and end all, SURELY Geelong won the game. Right?
Well at least someone mentioned a goal......because everything else has been 'pressure acts & tackles'.No he was one of our best tonight. 16 kicks, 9 tackles and a goal.
Champion
And had the 3rd highest touches for the team. Seriously lmao.lol.
He was almost single handedly holding them off towards the end, 43 pressure acts?, 9 tackles, and was fighting at the bottom of every pack doing what a captain should.
His selfless attitude and leadership on and off the field is one of the main reasons we're reigning premiers and sitting on top of the ladder.
Needs more sideways kicks and handballs lol.
Think of this what you will, but you beat the Cats in almost every aspect of the game tonight and in the end you were probably lucky to get the points, same as last week against Collingwood, Collingwood were all over you IMO until being 2 down kicked in.And nothing to do with their front running mids? Who cant defend the other way....man, have a real good look
We've been so decimated by injury I don't even know who'd replace him.
3rd most touches for Richmond, = most tackles in the game, 3rd most clearances for Richmond and a goal. Also 16 kicks, only 1 player in the game had more than 19.Well at least someone mentioned a goal......because everything else has been 'pressure acts & tackles'.
I assume you think he should keep his spot in the team?
Do some research.
Based on his last 4 weeks......I think his name should be mentioned in the next match committee meeting.3rd most touches for Richmond, = most tackles in the game and a goal. Do you think he should keep his spot?