thylacine60
Post-Human
- Banned
- #8,951
was he denying something 3 times because a rooster just crowed out my back door...............Haha! Now my post looks silly.
Fyi everyone. Mal posted it 3 times
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
was he denying something 3 times because a rooster just crowed out my back door...............Haha! Now my post looks silly.
Fyi everyone. Mal posted it 3 times
I'm really keen on Walsh.... but this, I'd do..
Big fish with no 2019 1st? Nah i don't think so soapDon't need to. Next years first for Shiel/Setterfield (plus this years PP) and you still get Walsh. IMO if that happens we are set. Next 2 years is about minimal changes and a couple of big fish
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Love it Soapy V make it happen will youDon't need to. Next years first for Shiel/Setterfield (plus this years PP) and you still get Walsh. IMO if that happens we are set. Next 2 years is about minimal changes and a couple of big fish
shutup thoughI don't think it is. Could do worse than a Goddard as a distributor/mentor for a year. At least he's an old pro.
1 for Shiel and Setterfield seems like a good bet to me.
Big fish with no 2019 1st? Nah i don't think so soap
I just can't see them trading him for a future pickWe wouldn't be handing over a future 1st for Shiel alone. That's likely a top 4 pick for a player who we could get for free next year.
I reckon the Dons would look to swap their 1st for Setterfield this year alone though and the Giants would do it, so it's more likely he winds up at Windy Hill.
So were more likely to get Shiel alone for our future 1st with a second coming back with him.
Don't think that will be the plan. We will seeFree Agents or Future Picks. No problem
Can't see a team at the bottom of the ladder trading a future 1st either. That can come back to biteI just can't see them trading him for a future pick
I just can't see them trading him for a future pick
Can't see a team at the bottom of the ladder trading a future 1st either. That can come back to bite
And not pick up a top draft selection 2 years in a row if we send off our future pick? Again, cannot see that happening.Free Agents or Future Picks. No problem
Neale, May, Gray & Wingard are just some of the FA's available next year
thnx 10cGoddard is bs
Prefer we dont trade eitherIt could end up being a low pick, like pick 1.
So let's not take the gamble and trade... pick 1?
A future 1st is a better outcome for us than trading pick 1.
Because all it is, is a pick upgrade. They don't won't picks anyway, they won't a flagWhy?
And not pick up a top draft selection 2 years in a row if we send off our future pick? Again, cannot see that happening.
So knows the best way to build a list is through the draft.
thnx 10c
Any more tid bits
Goddard now?........FMD
Because all it is, is a pick upgrade. They don't won't picks anyway, they won't a flag
Thank **** for that 10pc.Goddard is bs