- Oct 18, 2016
- 5,068
- 9,803
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Banned
- #551
When you think you've woken up to a tasty rumour but it's just another convoluted trade hypothetical...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
It was Mitch, SOS would have looked pretty silly if he asked Adelaide for Jeremy...That was the other Gov wasnt it ?
Wouldn't of been Mitch one would of thought.
If you know no one is gonna take Walsh with one and two it could work little risky ..and not that easy turning one into three and nine ..gotta get luckyTrade 1 for 3 & 9
Walsh with 3, Cerra for 9+28 =
1+28 for Walsh & Cerra
I'm pretty sure that's illegal. You're using IP gained through a prior job's relationship with an organisation against that organisation for your own gain.Reid was Gibbs manager and negotiated his last contract with Carlton immediately prior to becoming Adelaide's list manager. Adelaide knew exactly what the structure of Gibbs contract was
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No just opinion ...if gws were to let him go due to salary cap constraints ..We have the runs on the board to get the deal doneHey mate, is this an opinion or some inside info?
It would be, but the info would have been disclosed to all parties in the early part of negotiations so there’s been no breach of trust/privacy.I'm pretty sure that's illegal. You're using IP gained through a prior job's relationship with an organisation against that organisation for your own gain.
Any lawyers in the thread want to confirm/disagree?
SOS is GOD and can do whatever the .... he wants..It was Mitch, SOS would have looked pretty silly if he asked Adelaide for Jeremy...

Take him court. Ned Guy is now Collingwood's list manager.I'm pretty sure that's illegal. You're using IP gained through a prior job's relationship with an organisation against that organisation for your own gain.
Any lawyers in the thread want to confirm/disagree?
Cheers for the tidbit, tcp. So that means we're valuing him (or the trade is likely to be for) around a mid-late first rounder?Gov coming across will hinge on getting a first round PP or Adelaide moving up the draft order elsewhere.
Cheers for the tidbit, tcp. So that means we're valuing him (or the trade is likely to be for) around a mid-late first rounder?
It'll probably end up being a Charlie Cameron-type deal tbh... who went for 12 - overs, but was circumstantial.
Gov coming across will hinge on getting a first round PP or Adelaide moving up the draft order elsewhere.
So McGovern, Cerra and Brodie all warrant first round picks but Shiell (All Australian Midfielder) is not good enough or important enough (Midfield Is our biggest issue) for us to trade for?
If GWS want to do the Shiell trade this year we get it done.
We need experience quality mids asap.
A few thoughts...
We need Pick 1 for Sam Walsh.
Quite confident we aren’t getting a pre-first round priority pick. I believe it will be mid-first round.
McGovern is a great get. There (was) another Victorian team in the mix but you can basically lock it in. JSOS? Kerr? Please, stop. McGovern is 50x better than any of those names.
McGovern’s value is much closer to a mid-first round (& even end-of-first round) PP than Pick 1, so that would be the starting point. Once you start talking Pick 1, it becomes the most valuable asset (by far) in the trade. It then becomes less a case of us trading for McGovern and more a case of Adelaide trading for Pick 1. Then, the same principle applies - it will take an unprecedented bounty to prise Walsh from SOS’ grasp. We aren’t Gold Coast.
2019 1st is in play to get deals done. Very valuable asset.
Yaas thanks for the good word, TRP.A few thoughts...
We need Pick 1 for Sam Walsh.
Quite confident we aren’t getting a pre-first round priority pick. I believe it will be mid-first round.
McGovern is a great get. There (was) another Victorian team in the mix but you can basically lock it in. JSOS? Kerr? Please, stop. McGovern is 50x better than any of those names.
McGovern’s value is much closer to a mid-first round (& even end-of-first round) PP than Pick 1, so that would be the starting point. Once you start talking Pick 1, it becomes the most valuable asset (by far) in the trade. It then becomes less a case of us trading for McGovern and more a case of Adelaide trading for Pick 1. Then, the same principle applies - it will take an unprecedented bounty to prise Walsh from SOS’ grasp. We aren’t Gold Coast.
2019 1st is in play to get deals done. Very valuable asset.
Today is Tuesday? I'm going back to bed. Nothing good ever comes from tuesday.Waking up to an email saying there is a new blumour, then there not being....
Tuesday ruined!!!
Who has 3 and 9?Trade 1 for 3 & 9
Walsh with 3, Cerra for 9+28 =
1+28 for Walsh & Cerra