smasha
It's Time!
The white,the off white,the tusk,the ivory or the beige?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Harsha Bhogle was interesting yesterday when he said ball tampering is a minor offence in cricket that usually carries a 1 match suspension and Indian cricket cannot believe the players copped a 12 month suspension. It doesn't appear Australia disciplining players has made any impression on other countries but to laugh at us.
At least he actually values his wicket which is more than we can say for Finch and Smarsh based on their shot selection today.I’m sick to death of every commentator on fox criticising Handscombe’s technique. He’s the only batsman that has stood up so far ffs.
Im sick to death of everyone spelling his name "HANDSCOMBE"I’m sick to death of every commentator on fox criticising Handscombe’s technique. He’s the only batsman that has stood up so far ffs.
Im sick to death of everyone spelling his name "HANDSCOMBE"
"Belaaaaarruuuughghghghgh!!!!!!" is actually Hindi for "Bowled Ravi".Bit of a difference between "Bowled Gary", "Bowling Shane" and "Belaaaaarruuuughghghghgh!!!!!!"
Micky Vaughan calling him Handsome
Got a feeling our tail will wag be great to get a ton or so out of em even Lyon can get a fewA solid partnership here puts us right back in it. Just need to get a bit of out of Paine, Cummins, and maybe Starc.
Smith is a freakish unicorn basically. Look at what happens when you preserver with unfashionable things, you get a Lyon sometimes. Yeah promoting good technique (even if you fail) with a focus on tests in our youth development would have been far better. Be average for 5 years then you get your Smiths, Starcs to add the x factor. We have all these young guys that cant even hold it down, they all think they have Warner and Smiths eye and they are being coached like that because of the 'success' of guys like Warner. In a healthy setup he is of Symonds level importance, by the ned he was running the show, ****ing laughable.Smith's technique is still questionable too.
Would you have fathered we continued our form at the start of this decade and selected average batsmen with good technique?
Slats?I’m sick to death of every commentator on fox criticising Handscombe’s technique. He’s the only batsman that has stood up so far ffs.
Usually it carries a fine - the 1-match man is the maximum possible punishment.
Wouldn't surprise me if the 9-12 month bans had ramifications on the team's performance beyond this summer too.
Spot on. I feel to an extent the 'cultural issues' are overblown because many people don't just want to admit we aren't very good any more.The real reason I beleive Aussies are hostile to the cricket team is so many got used to Australia dominating everyone for about 2 decades. It became the norm to be so much better than everyone and when we became an average side, it was jarring, uncomfortable and the team lost respect and popularity. I mean everyone loved the cricket team in the 2000's and they were more abrasive, aggressive, etc then than now.
Highlight so far was SMarsh's patient 2
I like them between two quality sides, not a good side and an ordinary side.I enjoy low scoring tight tests
I'm a big proponent of technique - Warner has a very good technique in my view combined with an aggressive attitude. Smith is as you correctly point out a freak with an eye like a dead fish. There's not a lot of strong technique's coming through and that's a bigger concern imo.Smith is a freakish unicorn basically. Look at what happens when you preserver with unfashionable things, you get a Lyon sometimes. Yeah promoting good technique (even if you fail) with a focus on tests in our youth development would have been far better. Be average for 5 years then you get your Smiths, Starcs to add the x factor. We have all these young guys that cant even hold it down, they all think they have Warner and Smiths eye and they are being coached like that because of the 'success' of guys like Warner. In a healthy setup he is of Symonds level importance, by the ned he was running the show, ******* laughable.