Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
any chance Flanders will be there at pick 9 ? would be my first selection.
if he is gone, it would be a toss up between Robertson, Weightman and Kemp
Don't think I could put up with the relentless Simpsons references if we took Flanders, Newman has been bad enough.any chance Flanders will be there at pick 9 ? would be my first selection.
if he is gone, it would be a toss up between Robertson, Weightman and Kemp
Don't think I could put up with the relentless Simpsons references if we took Flanders, Newman has been bad enough.
Don't like his hair. A firm NO!!!any chance Flanders will be there at pick 9 ? would be my first selection.
What’s his range Arrow? At his best he could become which player? What’s his floor?And extremely underrated
Yeah, he's a beast. I think he goes a bit later than our pick but I shudder at the thought of guys like Fisher and LOB having to play against him. He'll have a physical presence like Jono Brown or Barry Hall.I don't think there's any way Will Gould fails at AFL level. Just looks a 10 year player, unfortunately we have a few similar players to him.
What’s his range Arrow? At his best he could become which player? What’s his floor?
I don't think there's any way Will Gould fails at AFL level. Just looks a 10 year player, unfortunately we have a few similar players to him.
I don’t think he will get past the Doggies at pick 13 as they need a classy small forward and from what I’ve heard are very interested in Weightman.Still, If we believe someone like Weightman can be got in late teens. I would not be against trading pick 9 for something like a pick 17 and another pick in 20's if any other club sees that suits both clubs. Geelong may have pick 17 from memory so would be curious if Wells and SOS did a swap pick this period. Unlikely but if it happened would not surprise me.
I don’t think he will get past the Doggies at pick 13 as they need a classy small forward and from what I’ve heard are very interested in Weightman.
I’m actually surprised more people have not thrown Gould’s name up for us at pick 9, my only concern would be trying to keep his weight in check ( ala Whitnall ) already 102 kg at 192cm he is a big boy, also the strain carrying that sort of weight around would have on his body especially knees and ankles, would have to try and thin him out a bit to play half back consistently. But would slot in from rd1 next year.Gould or Kemp for me.
Port has pick 12 and if I was them I would take Gould if still there, Hawks have 11 which if a bid comes for Mcginnas before then they would match otherwise who knows doubt they would take Weightman that early.Seems likely.
9 maybe too early, 15 seems probably too late.
Who has pick 12 ?
You'll be putting up with these Simpsons references - and you'll like it!Don't think I could put up with the relentless Simpsons references if we took Flanders, Newman has been bad enough.
Similar size to Travis Boak. I can't seem to find any highlights for Robertson, is there anyone he is alike to?And extremely underrated
Similar size to Travis Boak. I can't seem to find any highlights for Robertson, is there anyone he is alike to?
I'd be for his inclusion, provided he's not Brock Maclean slow, and his disposal is good for an inside player. We need another accumulator, and we need more hardness around the ball.
Still, If we believe someone like Weightman can be got in late teens. I would not be against trading pick 9 for something like a pick 17 and another pick in 20's if any other club sees that suits both clubs. Geelong may have pick 17 from memory so would be curious if Wells and SOS did a swap pick this period. Unlikely but if it happened would not surprise me.
Ed is 30 at the start of next season, Murph is 32; we are not so flush of inside mids with leadership prospects that we can point blank ignore one that will go late first/early second round. And Joel Selwood was just an inside mid as a draftee.Don't want any mid that can't kick goals.
Don't need an 18 year old inside mid.
Don't want a KPF nor a KPD.
Do want speed.
Do want goal-kickers.
Anderson sounds perfect but that isn't going to happen.
Don't mind the idea of a Serong or Flanders but getting to us is the trick.
Jackson is intriguing, but could we make that call on draft night?
Flanders is a midfielder/forward so I don’t see the Simo comparisonDon't think I could put up with the relentless Simpsons references if we took Flanders, Newman has been bad enough.
Ed is 30 at the start of next season, Murph is 32; we are not so flush of inside mids with leadership prospects that we can point blank ignore one that will go late first/early second round. And Joel Selwood was just an inside mid as a draftee.
We certainly need speed and more scoring options, but part of the process we began in 2015 was in finding replacements for the senior players on their way out. We were lucky Walsh could accumulate at AFL level as well as he did in his first season, because he (and Cripps) disguise the fact that our onball brigade is decidely short 2-3 players.
We definitely do not have enough top tier mids to be ignoring anyone who might slip. Either trade picks from this year or futures, and get in what we will need now instead of waiting a few years to see if what we've already got is up to it. That was Adelaide's mistake; let's not make it ours.