yaco55
Hall of Famer
Townsend was only delisted by ONE club.
Townsend was TRADED to Richmond.
It's the same thing - He was unwanted by the GWS who manged to trade him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Townsend was only delisted by ONE club.
Townsend was TRADED to Richmond.
It dropped for a very short time and it was predominantly as a spare man in defence. Should he have been picked for Prem side? Yes for intimidation factor. But he was a very ordinary footballer for most of his career. There would not have been any role for him in today’s gameMy original post about Wallis stated that he debuted at the age of 17 but wasn't ready for the rigors of AFL footy - It took him a few years for the 'penny to drop' but at the same time he had an injury ravaged career, especially his hamstrings.
Getting the traded by GWS back then for a 4th rounder is effectively the same as being delisted.Townsend was only delisted by ONE club.
Townsend was TRADED to Richmond.
I take it from the Chicken Little posting in here that we traded a couple of first rounders for him?
I take it from the Chicken Little posting in here that we traded a couple of first rounders for him?
I’m not sure what other people don’t like about the selection. For me it’s not the price we paid to get him, it’s the price we pay to play him.
If he’s playing it would (should) only be when we have given up on Laverde, begley and Langford as that type of player forward. Even more dire if he is there to fix our midfield.
I don’t mind If he’s been picked as a pseudo player/coach. A guy who sets standards at training, helps set the tone of expectations, assists in transitioning truck and Caracella’s game plan, and perhaps as that in-case-of-emergency-break-glass guy.
Emphasis on the might. Townsend, though limited, wouldn’t have to produce a heap (of pressure or offense) to offer more than Begley or Laverde did this year.From how he is being described it seems his role will be to add pressure around the contest, I don't think we need him up forward in that sort of role because Walla covers the role of forward pressure. I would want to see how the preseason goes before assuming what if any roles there is for Townsend in the side but there is a need for extra pressure around the contest which isn't going to come from Langford or Zakka but might come from Lavarde or Begley.
Hamill was the original battering ram. Took and dished out a massive amount of punishment...so yes.
I am assessing him on his merits - He got early games at the Giants because he had a more developed body and also added hardness which has been a trait of GWS from day one - Yes, he was eventually surplus to requirements at GWS and moved on to Richmond - He only got into the best 22 at the tail end of 2017 because of injuries and struck a purple patch of form for a month - After being dropped after round 8 in 2018, he got back for one more game - The salary cap for a player of Townsend's ilk is irrelevant because these type of players only get 200K or a little more if he is lucky.
That’s still not an assessment of him as a footballer.
What does he bring to the table? I’m not sure he’s going to offer all that much but that’s because of what he is, not because he’s off the scrapheap.
That assessment could be applied to half our list, give the bloke a chance you may be pleasantly surprised.I've already assessed his worth as a player - Limited kicking skills in traffic, limited vision in traffic, often fumbles ground balls, average speed, average decision-maker, struggles to read the play, poor at spreading from the contest - So he's not going to cut it as an inside mid and he's a worse version of Myers - Doubt he has the smarts to be a long term prospect as a forward and he's not really for this role at EFC.
remember, all 40 or so players on our list should be in the top 10 players in the league, otherwise they are just list cloggingThat assessment could be applied to half our list, give the bloke a chance you may be pleasantly surprised.
I don't mind one or two early if they have the effect of unsettling the oppo. If a player like Johannisen or Papley hear footsteps or fear taking possession because Townsend is nuts, I'm good with that.In my limited viewing of him, he always seems to be giving away some really ill-disciplined free kicks. We're bad enough with quality forward entries and retention in our forward line as is. We all saw how frustrating it was with Mark Baguley.
Moneyball.We have one of the softest lists in the afl. Abit of grunt is welcomed
Richmond had not one player on the injury list at the end 2017. Hard to believe but was a fact. Yes he had a purple patch, however, he was played for his ferocious attack on the man and his ability to protect fellow team members. Also high goal conversion rate.The only fear Richmond will have of Essendon In 2020 is the physical damage he could inflict to our players.I am assessing him on his merits - He got early games at the Giants because he had a more developed body and also added hardness which has been a trait of GWS from day one - Yes, he was eventually surplus to requirements at GWS and moved on to Richmond - He only got into the best 22 at the tail end of 2017 because of injuries and struck a purple patch of form for a month - After being dropped after round 8 in 2018, he got back for one more game - The salary cap for a player of Townsend's ilk is irrelevant because these type of players only get 200K or a little more if he is lucky.
Richmond had not one player on the injury list at the end 2017. Hard to believe but was a fact. Yes he had a purple patch, however, he was played for his ferocious attack on the man and his ability to protect fellow team members. Also high goal conversion rate.The only fear Richmond will have of Essendon In 2020 is the physical damage he could inflict to our players.