Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah don't really need a genius to tell me Dunkley is overpriced.
I had Taranto all year this year and watched his average jump from 88 to 102. He's made the big leap now i'm jumping off in 2020.
Might pump his average up a few more points but i doubt he'll end up in 110 territory so there's not really much upside to starting him IMO.
Dustbin is clearly undervalued. Dangerspud routinely drops 150k each season at some point. In 2019 he dropped just under 190k from his starting price.
Kelly, for all his applauded performances as a "FWD" ...still only managed an ave of 103 with 12 tons from 22 gamesTim Kelly
Rory Sloane
Mr Coniglio
Disagree strongly. Dunkley played his first 6 games as a forward in 2019 and averaged 85.8. When moved into the middle he averaged 127.9 in the remaining 17 games.
There's no reason he wouldn't play the same amount of midfield time as he did in that 127 average period, so with him priced at an average of 116, his average midfield scoring output would have to drop off by 15+ points for him to be considered overpriced. Seems unlikely from a young player in a rising team.
Dunkley was the first picked player in my midfield and one of only a few absolute locks in my entire team.
The same attitude would have prevented you from picking Macrae a couple of years ago. Take it from a dogs fan, he’s as safe as houses to continue in the same role, a role in which he out averaged every other player in the competition bar Grundy and Gawn. As if that wasn’t reason enough to pick him, he’s priced at 50k below that average.Unlike bulldog supporters, I don't instantly think Dunkley is a gun on the back of one impressive season in the guts.
Bont and Macrae are proven SC mid performers for the bulldogs, so why bother taking the risk on Dunkley continuing his amazing form?
You're at the mercy of Beveridge. Each to their own but I'll stick with the 2 dogs mids with more runs on the board as a safer bet.
I'm sure it's not a bad idea by any means, I just don't see any value in Dunkley.
Safest premium MID is Neale IMO. Or CrippsThe same attitude would have prevented you from picking Macrae a couple of years ago. Take it from a dogs fan, he’s as safe as houses to continue in the same role, a role in which he out averaged every other player in the competition bar Grundy and Gawn. As if that wasn’t reason enough to pick him, he’s priced at 50k below that average.
This isn’t coming from Bulldogs bias, straightforward statistics make him the safest premium mid for 2020 for mine.
Safest premium MID is Neale IMO. Or Cripps
Did Brisbane pick up any experienced in and under clearance types?
Got tagged successfully in the later part of the season .....will tagging become more prevalent in 2020 ?Safest premium MID is Neale IMO. Or Cripps
Did Brisbane pick up any experienced in and under clearance types?
I have similar thoughts re Neale.Got tagged successfully in the later part of the season .....will tagging become more prevalent in 2020 ?
Neale worries me, if tagged
With Bulldogs, would Bont be the first player tagged ?
Got tagged successfully in the later part of the season .....will tagging become more prevalent in 2020 ?
Neale worries me, if tagged
With Bulldogs, would Bont be the first player tagged ?
lolMacrae, Fyfe, Cripps, Danger and Titch
fu** it I’m going for the $50k in 2021
Very serious. Ban plz.Kelly, for all his applauded performances as a "FWD" ...still only managed an ave of 103 with 12 tons from 22 games
Oliver, who had a "s**t" year ....averaged 109 with 14 tons from 22 games ......at $32K diff I think Oliver can improve on 2019 ...not sure Kelly will
Sloane IMO is on the wrong side of the "Bell Curve" .....30 YO at seasons start & has slowed down and getting battered .....will probably start the season well, consider as an upgrade option
Will Brodie is my breakout pick ala Oliver/Worpel
will be keeping close eye on him
The same attitude would have prevented you from picking Macrae a couple of years ago. Take it from a dogs fan, he’s as safe as houses to continue in the same role, a role in which he out averaged every other player in the competition bar Grundy and Gawn. As if that wasn’t reason enough to pick him, he’s priced at 50k below that average.
This isn’t coming from Bulldogs bias, straightforward statistics make him the safest premium mid for 2020 for mine.
Re Brodie ....the GC have just added 3 new midfielders ...Rowell, Anderson and Greenwood ....Flanders will start predominantly fwd .....lots of competition there & I'd still favor RowellSwear Brodies name gets thrown up every year
80 average last year from 8 games. I think he got injured early in one game, so take that 19 score out and his average is now 89
But what does the addition of another inside midfielder in Greenwood, who will play every game, do for him? Brodies position is hardly guaranteed.
Seems a nothing pick for mine. He's not a money maker and he's not a keeper, so you better hope he can average 95-100 to make it worth while at 435K
I'd take the punt on spuddy Hannebury before selecting Brodie. At least there's proven premo history, a 96 average from last year and is 20k cheaper.