Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
It's impossible for God's creations to understand God's ways because God is so far above us. The Bible indicates however that God created man (humanity) in His image. I don't know why He did. I could speculate that perhaps He was lonely, having always been there alone throughout eternity.I asked a simple question 'why create'? yet no one is able to answer this question yet, they seem to know about the properties of this deity. (aka loving, kind , caring, personal)
oh dearIt's impossible for God's creations to understand God's ways because God is so far above us. The Bible indicates however that God created man (humanity) in His image. I don't know why He did. I could speculate that perhaps He was lonely, having always been there alone throughout eternity.
You said because you were born into and raised into a christian upbringing you will have an advantage over someone who has not, such as myself. How is that, in the eyes of our creators, fair at all?
I have said that I am lucky in my circumstance. I could have been born in east Greenland and raised in Inuit culture and have not heard of God until I grew older and studied and perhaps went to a western education institution. There I might have learned of God and studied his teachings further, out of interest, and eventually I might have come to the faith. But I wasn't born in east Greenland, but that was out of my control.
It's not for me to say whether it's fair or not, it's just a fact.
Its like saying children in Ethiopia just should have been born somewhere better.
They might have been born somewhere else, but they weren't and that's simply factual. You're the one saying that I said they should have been.
See my post below where I address that point, except I use east Greenland as an example.oh dear
Luckily for you, you weren't born in Pakistan or you would be telling us how good the Islamic faith is in exactly the same glowing terms
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
The Bible indicates however that God created man (humanity) in His image.
Here is my question: why do you think that is?
Why did God make a reality in which his existence is unproven?
Thanks for the answer, but that just prompts the next question, what does he want souls that aren't his for?What scientific proof would be enough ? You have already got a Big Bang going bang. Innate matter producing love. Those that are lost are now found.
But to answer your question .. God wants you to use your soul. He likes all things about us and has given us a wonderful canvas to express ourselves ..but God wants good strong shiny robust souls. Cherish the soul.
So you're asking people to read God's mind. That ain't possible or rational.Thanks for the answer, but that just prompts the next question, what does he want souls that aren't his for?
And there's no answer to that which isn't at least vaguely ominous.
unless you equate it with reading the mind of the Easter Bunny......same resultSo you're asking people to read God's mind. That ain't possible or rational.
I have faith that He does mate. That was/is the teaching of Jesus.Then, pray tell, how do you know he loves you?
Inconsistent.I have faith that He does mate. That was/is the teaching of Jesus.
In what way is it inconsistent? We both agree that it isn't logical to think that i can read God's mind, but it isn't illogical to have faith that God loves me (and us all) nonetheless. faith doesn't require logic to function effectively.Inconsistent.
You have faith that he loves you, but don't think it's rational or logical to read his mind. I too think it's not rational or logical to read the mind of god, but methinks our reasons for that differ somewhat.
In what way is it inconsistent? We both agree that it isn't logical to think that i can read God's mind, but it isn't illogical to have faith that God loves me (and us all) nonetheless. faith doesn't require logic to function effectively.
Thanks for the patronising semantics dude. Keep chipping away, but is that all you got? I stand by what I wrote. You can have faith without a logical mind or approach. Equally, you can faith and a logical mind or approach. Faith stands alone.May wanna have a word with yourself first before you contradict yourself
If it doesn't require logic, then it isn't logic. You just admitted faith is illogical, yet somehow trying to argue it is logical. The absolute mess you're in
Thanks for the patronising semantics dude. Keep chipping away, but is that all you got? I stand by what I wrote. You can have faith without a logical mind or approach. Equally, you can faith and a logical mind or approach. Faith stands alone.
It's a pity you can't or won't acknowledge my point of view, but that's up to you.I mean, if you write rubbish you kinda deserve being patronised
Wow you basically try to have the cake and eat it, too, huh. Trying to argue your faith is logical while being illogical at the same time, how cravenly convenient. It makes absolutely no sense to any sound mind, but I guess that's the point of faith/delusion: it is whatever you want it to be, no matter how contradictory and stupid. You have just demonstrated it
They attempt to spread the word. Those that are receptive are the ones who God converts.It doesnt tend to go well though, when missionaries attempt to convert humans that are free from modern society...
They attempt to spread the word. Those that are receptive are the ones who God converts.
I have faith that He does mate. That was/is the teaching of Jesus.
It's a pity you can't or won't acknowledge my point of view, but that's up to you.
Cravenly convenient? (I suspect you just liked the alliteration). Delusion? Contradictory? Stupid? It's a pity you can't argue your case/make your observations without resorting to insulting the person your debating.
I've already told you that Christianity was used as a weapon against the indigenous peoples of the world. How valuable is the mantra of pacifism when you are the oppressing power; how useful is your religion when it tells slaves not to revolt, the culturally different to conform, those who are taken from to cede willingly.They attempt to spread the word. Those that are receptive are the ones who God converts.
They are not rules. Reaching out to those that so far are unreached is a challenge, and many missionaries are up for it. They don't use force. There are clearly those who are spiritually hungry, who will receive The Good News for what it is; others are either ambivalent, or negative.And just...what, screw the ones who are not receptive? What makes them less worthy? They were not chosen? I thought anyone could become converted?
These rules are confusing!
You might not have faith, and I think that's a pity, but that doesn't mean people of faith have to stop using the term. Faith is rather central to any discussion about God and religion I would have thought.Dear god....one has to stop using terms like 'faith' as though it somehow exalts them above people that don't have faith.
At the end of the day, we all have nothing. It's just where we are. We wish/hope/believe otherwise, but we just don't know...and that's OK.
I've already told you that Christianity was used as a weapon against the indigenous peoples of the world. How valuable is the mantra of pacifism when you are the oppressing power; how useful is your religion when it tells slaves not to revolt, the culturally different to conform, those who are taken from to cede willingly.