You know what else can GAGF - this emoji rumour bullshit. Absolute tripe.
And any of you lot who buy into it and encourage it can GAGF too. I'm looking squarely at the peanuts who repost it in the no discussion thread too - peak nuffies.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
You know what else can GAGF - this emoji rumour bullshit. Absolute tripe.
And any of you lot who buy into it and encourage it can GAGF too. I'm looking squarely at the peanuts who repost it in the no discussion thread too - peak nuffies.

What if Cripps isn't driving the standards and is the one undermining
They still could if it was based on the player, rather than the player and captain?
Say like Harry's contract?
Couldn’t agree more, spot onMy feel is that there is zero consistency in how things are trained amongst the entire group! LOB, SPS continue the good ole karate kid crane technique staying 5m away from their man corralling, others go in tentatively, whilst other go in and tackle and put physical pressure. The entire list looks out of synch with one another, mids are never in synch with the forwards, defence has no clue where the mids will be half the time. Our coaches biggest weakness of the last 10 years is to get the entire playing list playing to the same hymn book and that's our biggest failing. Our assistant line coaching has been so weak they forget they need to communicate with one another and appropriately link the other lines and overall game plan to what their teaching their players within their domain.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

What did you say out of interest?

I think the situation is a bit more complicated than that mate, SOS chose to quit, he wasn't pushed out the door, clearly he had problems and issues working with Liddle, and that is okay, these things happen in the corporate world all the time.
Both seem to be very headstrong types.
Will admit it was poor form by Liddle to go behind SOS's back and interview players from other clubs like Papley though, can see why Steve felt his position was undermined.
Still I am grateful that Liddle has helped put us back in a very healthy financial position that we can finally get rid of our income from those toxic pokie machines (something I think should be on the agenda in the next 6 months)
If someone is leaving the club, think it's only fair to mention the good work they did at the club as well as the bad.
You know what else can GAGF - this emoji rumour bullshit. Absolute tripe.
And any of you lot who buy into it and encourage it can GAGF too. I'm looking squarely at the peanuts who repost it in the no discussion thread too - peak nuffies.

I don't understand this logic. If the review found that he was a major part of the on-field issues, does putting us in a good financial position excuse that? You know what would put us in an even stronger financial position? Being good at football.Yeah let's sack the CEO that's put Carlton in its strongest financial position... Ever.
Makes sense![]()
Unlikely if he was undermining the standards and culture
Making money for a football club in 2021 a truly heroic performanceYeah let's sack the CEO that's put Carlton in its strongest financial position... Ever.
Makes sense![]()
You know what else can GAGF - this emoji rumour bullshit. Absolute tripe.
And any of you lot who buy into it and encourage it can GAGF too. I'm looking squarely at the peanuts who repost it in the no discussion thread too - peak nuffies.
You know what else can GAGF - this emoji rumour bullshit. Absolute tripe.
And any of you lot who buy into it and encourage it can GAGF too. I'm looking squarely at the peanuts who repost it in the no discussion thread too - peak nuffies.
You know what else can GAGF - this emoji rumour bullshit. Absolute tripe.
And any of you lot who buy into it and encourage it can GAGF too. I'm looking squarely at the peanuts who repost it in the no discussion thread too - peak nuffies.
=
If he stuck to finances, he’d probably keep his job.Yeah let's sack the CEO that's put Carlton in its strongest financial position... Ever.
Makes sense![]()
Tom Harley would be right up there at the top of my list as new CEO.
Pineapple - Hawaiian pizzas. Large Hawaiian is on the money?![]()
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
In retrospect, I probably got a bit too technical/nerdy about it (was for a medical position). Went off on a tangent about an ovoid structure with a trabeculated surface, green/grassy apex, often served sliced in the axial plane... But it all worked out in the end.
One of those questions designed to surprise/shock.
You know what else can GAGF - this emoji rumour bullshit. Absolute tripe.
And any of you lot who buy into it and encourage it can GAGF too. I'm looking squarely at the peanuts who repost it in the no discussion thread too - peak nuffies.
Gotta love your GAGF's. Keep them comingYou know what else can GAGF - this emoji rumour bullshit. Absolute tripe.
And any of you lot who buy into it and encourage it can GAGF too. I'm looking squarely at the peanuts who repost it in the no discussion thread too - peak nuffies.
I don't understand this logic. If the review found that he was a major part of the on-field issues, does putting us in a good financial position excuse that? You know what would put us in an even stronger financial position? Being good at football.