Remove this Banner Ad

Corona virus, Port and the AFL. Part 4.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I do enjoy reading their written speech, amazing grammar, too intelligent for bigfooty and clearly not Janus

It's like reading a bot that's got its dictionary mixed up with its thesaurus.
 
I'm sitting in the chemist. Just had my second moderna shot.

I can't be ****ed getting into the conspiracies, there are far too many idiots out there to be concerned about them. I do like that smart people do question the narrative. The Clique only believe in 1 narrative. That isn't healthy.

I have been critical of the massive over reaction the government and a fair portion of the soft yellow bellied public has had to this "pandemic". its effects on the population as a whole have been widely over stated and over compensated. I'm a "beliueve the Science" type of guy, but think our politicians have been incredibly over cautious and have listened far too much to the doubly overcautious mainly CMO's. The cost/risk/outcome ratios have been wildly miscalculated.
 
Conclusions: Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.

Wow amazing findings on ivermectin! Guy who advocates it publishes paper says it may work, sometimes. If the disease isn't severe. Possibly. I'm moderately sure.

This isn't some smoking gun.

Those things are massive if true, which studies have indicated they are and no studies have disproven. It is a smoking gun as the complete opposite is being touted publicly and undertaken medically.

The current response principle is to try to stop infection entirely via vaccination and severe methods of quarantine/isolation. Both of these mechanisms are very evidently not working. Doubling down on them will not work any better, yet that is what we are poised to do.

The key alternative principle is to prevent Covid19 infection from progressing past minor, hence the emphasis on early intervention methodologies. Once the disease reaches a critical level all hell breaks loose inside the body as the cellular structures forming the blood vessels are variously destroyed. The medical response to this has been directly adding to fatalities by applying treatments that increase the oxidative process causing rampant cell destruction.

Only a very small percentage of people get hit hard with this virus and a large proportion of these are identifiable by their personal risk profiles. It seems a far better course to seek and apply treatment methodologies that assist the immune system to cope with the virus, thus reducing risk outside of the main at-risk cohorts.

Elevated strategies can then be better targeted at that high risk cohort rather than at everyone, including kids who have next to f'all chance of any impact from the virus. Those strategies would include a top to bottom renovation of our shoddy privatised aged care system.

This document provides a mind-melting summary of how the virus actually works.
This basic understanding is really important.
The document goes on with things you'll regard as tin hat territory. Just ignore them. I don't accept them as gospel, but neither can I prove them not to be true. The available facts would seem to make them technically possible. The salient question is 'would people in power actually do these things?' Would billionaires put their own self-interest ahead of social and other individuals' well-being? Hmmm. Let me think...
 
That reply looks to me to be the work of someone who hasn't interacted with a human being since the Leyland P76 won Wheels Car of the Year.

Pretentious Pompous Puerile Poppycock.
A P76 winning car of the year? This is surely misinformation?

Sent from my Nokia 7.2 using Tapatalk
 
I'm sitting in the chemist. Just had my second moderna shot.

I can't be f’ed getting into the conspiracies, there are far too many idiots out there to be concerned about them. I do like that smart people do question the narrative. The Clique only believe in 1 narrative. That isn't healthy.

I have been critical of the massive over reaction the government and a fair portion of the soft yellow bellied public has had to this "pandemic". its effects on the population as a whole have been widely over stated and over compensated. I'm a "beliueve the Science" type of guy, but think our politicians have been incredibly over cautious and have listened far too much to the doubly overcautious mainly CMO's. The cost/risk/outcome ratios have been wildly miscalculated.

Papa the smart people have done the research and developed the vaccines. Without being funny the average unvaccinated joe is not a very smart person. The average IQ of this cohort would be several points lower than their vaccinated counterparts. If you are unvaccinated by choice at this point you are siding with the idiots.

I agree that the government handling and response is up for debate but the science is what it is.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

This document provides a mind-melting summary of how the virus actually works.
This basic understanding is really important.
The document goes on with things you'll regard as tin hat territory. Just ignore them. I don't accept them as gospel, but neither can I prove them not to be true. The available facts would seem to make them technically possible. The salient question is 'would people in power actually do these things?' Would billionaires put their own self-interest ahead of social and other individuals' well-being? Hmmm. Let me think...
First line......
"This is an anonymously posted document by someone who calls themselves Spartacus. " :drunk:
 
Those things are massive if true, which studies have indicated they are and no studies have disproven. It is a smoking gun as the complete opposite is being touted publicly and undertaken medically.

The current response principle is to try to stop infection entirely via vaccination and severe methods of quarantine/isolation. Both of these mechanisms are very evidently not working. Doubling down on them will not work any better, yet that is what we are poised to do.

The key alternative principle is to prevent Covid19 infection from progressing past minor, hence the emphasis on early intervention methodologies. Once the disease reaches a critical level all hell breaks loose inside the body as the cellular structures forming the blood vessels are variously destroyed. The medical response to this has been directly adding to fatalities by applying treatments that increase the oxidative process causing rampant cell destruction.

Only a very small percentage of people get hit hard with this virus and a large proportion of these are identifiable by their personal risk profiles. It seems a far better course to seek and apply treatment methodologies that assist the immune system to cope with the virus, thus reducing risk outside of the main at-risk cohorts.

Elevated strategies can then be better targeted at that high risk cohort rather than at everyone, including kids who have next to f'all chance of any impact from the virus. Those strategies would include a top to bottom renovation of our shoddy privatised aged care system.

This document provides a mind-melting summary of how the virus actually works.
This basic understanding is really important.
The document goes on with things you'll regard as tin hat territory. Just ignore them. I don't accept them as gospel, but neither can I prove them not to be true. The available facts would seem to make them technically possible. The salient question is 'would people in power actually do these things?' Would billionaires put their own self-interest ahead of social and other individuals' well-being? Hmmm. Let me think...

Are you vaccinated?
 
Imagine accusing others of being scared but believing in a global vaccine conspiracy 🤣

That's called a straw man argument. You've stylised a position for me that isn't correct so you can easily discredit it and me with it. The critical thing is that you've not done it consciously as a sneaky debating trick. You really believe that false position because it's convenient to your immediate purpose of feeling safe in the midst of a very complex and difficult situation. There are lot's of people who share the same false conviction whose harmony serves to reinforce the validity of your personal unknowingness.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

First line......
"This is an anonymously posted document by someone who calls themselves Spartacus. " :drunk:

I posted it for its detailed outline of the physiological effects of the Covid19 virus. S******ing smuttily over its various peripheries is your choice. Would your lead argument against vegetarianism be that Hitler was one?
 
I posted it for its detailed outline of the physiological effects of the Covid19 virus. S******ing smuttily over its various peripheries is your choice. Would your lead argument against vegetarianism be that Hitler was one?

Seems like we have a terminal case of verbal diarrhea tinged with a flourish of Godwin's law.

AKA Sesquipedalian Loquaciousness Reductio ad Hitlerum

Usually associated with excessive use of Ivermectin.
 
Last edited:
There are lots of people who share your personal unknowingness of the proper use of an apostrophe.

There are lot's of people who share your obsession with trivial error as a means of avoiding more meaningful comment.

Note my repetition of the illegal form of the apostrophe. Just giving you a basis for further clever reply.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top