List Mgmt. 2022 Trade Thread - Part III

[PandaG]

Roos board still confident of Clark
If we get anything less that pick 3 (9back) I would be very disappointed.
I still think that’s too much but happy to get a generational talent.

Some rubbish on their site about a future second and a 40s pick.
If someone knows anything regarding Clark it’s time to put us at ease…can’t say I trust the Gags with this one.

 

[lewdogs]

Geelong picking ahead of us for aquiring a player is pretty amazing.

 

[PandaG]

Rawlings said it

Hoping that is the future second and pick 40…it’s garbage

 

[George]

Hoping that is the future second and pick 40…it’s garbage

Dunno what you're on about I just saw a snippet in the whispers thread. I don't pay any attention to the trade period, biggest two weeks of fluff I can imagine.

 

[Joffaboy]

Grundy for pick 27
Bowes + 7 for a future 3rd

But hey... Zaine Cordy for free! Am I right folks?!?

Grundy plus a mill for 5
Bowes plus 850 k over two and didn't want to come to us

Cordy, zero dp's and what 500k a year? Good deal, but hey always greener

 

[PandaG]

Dunno what you're on about I just saw a snippet in the whispers thread. I don't pay any attention to the trade period, biggest two weeks of fluff I can imagine.

Just a rumor floated on north board that’s what was offered for Clark
My hope is we said no to the future 2nd and 40 for Clark. All be it it will be pick 19 next year.

 

[Saint Shags]

Dunno what you're on about I just saw a snippet in the whispers thread. I don't pay any attention to the trade period, biggest two weeks of fluff I can imagine.

He didn't rule it out fully. Made sure he left the door open slightly.
I reckon they'll continue to try. Be a matter of whether they can satisfy the Saints.

 

[Dard Ball Get]

I haven't looked at them extensively like you have so I wouldn't know, soy-boy.

Raw & unpasteurised jersey milk for me thank you.
Imagine drinking an estrogenic waste product lmao.

 

[stavro#4]

Norf have said the Clark deal is closed and wont happen

Rawlings said it

But when asked on SEN Breakfast about a trade for Clark, list and recruiting manager Brady Rawlings stated the club will keep discussions going with the Saints.

“He’s certainly someone we’ve got interest in, he’s also had a bit of a bad run the last couple of years (with injuries), he’s been quite unlucky. We think he’s an absolute talent who could really help us, we got the feeling he might be gettable and we felt the door was ajar there and maybe that’s closed now,” Rawlings explained.

Leaves it’s open and clearly says they want to talk to us.

 

[Saint Shags]

But when asked on SEN Breakfast about a trade for Clark, list and recruiting manager Brady Rawlings stated the club will keep discussions going with the Saints.

“He’s certainly someone we’ve got interest in, he’s also had a bit of a bad run the last couple of years (with injuries), he’s been quite unlucky. We think he’s an absolute talent who could really help us, we got the feeling he might be gettable and we felt the door was ajar there and maybe that’s closed now,” Rawlings explained.

Leaves it’s open and clearly says they want to talk to us.

Yeah I read it that way too. Trying to temper expectations on their part but also leaving the possibility there that it could happen.

 

[Joffaboy]

Lets see how desperate they get with Clark.

Worst case is we keep Clark which is mighty fine by me

 

[George]

Raw & unpasteurised jersey milk for me thank you.
Imagine drinking an estrogenic waste product lmao.

You should be going straight to the source if you're a real man. Lay down and start sucking.

 

[XhazzafootyX]

But when asked on SEN Breakfast about a trade for Clark, list and recruiting manager Brady Rawlings stated the club will keep discussions going with the Saints.

“He’s certainly someone we’ve got interest in, he’s also had a bit of a bad run the last couple of years (with injuries), he’s been quite unlucky. We think he’s an absolute talent who could really help us, we got the feeling he might be gettable and we felt the door was ajar there and maybe that’s closed now,” Rawlings explained.

Leaves it’s open and clearly says they want to talk to us.

He defs was gettable a few weeks ago, but it feels as if our stance has changed.

 

[George]

He didn't rule it out fully. Made sure he left the door open slightly.
I reckon they'll continue to try. Be a matter of whether they can satisfy the Saints.

But when asked on SEN Breakfast about a trade for Clark, list and recruiting manager Brady Rawlings stated the club will keep discussions going with the Saints.

“He’s certainly someone we’ve got interest in, he’s also had a bit of a bad run the last couple of years (with injuries), he’s been quite unlucky. We think he’s an absolute talent who could really help us, we got the feeling he might be gettable and we felt the door was ajar there and maybe that’s closed now,” Rawlings explained.

Leaves it’s open and clearly says they want to talk to us.

Ah I only saw the door closed bit.

 

[gubby88]

He defs was gettable a few weeks ago, but it feels as if our stance has changed.

I don't think the stance has ever changed. Unless it's a top pick, he's a saint.
If it's a top pick, it will be considered

On SM-F711B using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Joffaboy]

He defs was gettable a few weeks ago, but it feels as if our stance has changed.

Stance hasn't changed. Gettable but at the right price. They were saying that a month ago.

 

[SaintsofSteel]

I would be surprised to see North give up pick 3 in any trade circumstances.

I wonder if we would be prepared to accept Ports future 1st and a sweetener like Norths futue 3rd or a Tristan Xerri

38

Tristan Xerri

Age

26

Ht

202cm

Wt

99kg

Pos.

Ruck

Career

Season

Last 5

D

5.5

1star

K

3.0

1star

HB

2.5

2star

CL

1.0

3star

HO

2.5

5star

D

5.5

1star

K

3.0

1star

HB

2.5

2star

CL

1.0

3star

HO

2.5

5star

D

5.5

2star

K

3.0

1star

HB

2.5

3star

CL

1.0

3star

HO

2.5

5star

type player?

Also some how the club still needs to fill the tall forward/2nd ruckman they stated they were chasing at the start of the trade week?

Its reported that Melbourne are now chasing Schache as they expect to lose Weideman. Our options are quickly narrowing?

 

[70s sainter]

Roos next years first for our next years 2nd and Clarke
They can back them selves and hate on us all of next year
If they finish 9th that’s their pick 10 for our 18 if we finish last .
Not a bad deal for them .

 

[lewdogs]

Roos next years first for our next years 2nd and Clarke
They can back them selves and hate on us all of next year
If they finish 9th that’s their pick 10 for our 18 if we finish last .
Not a bad deal for them .

I'd love to get our hands on their future first but surely they'd never do it.

 

[phantom13]

I would be surprised to see North give up pick 3 in any trade circumstances.

I wonder if we would be prepared to accept Ports future 1st and a sweeter like Norths futue 3rd or a Tristan Xerri type player?

Also some how the club still needs to fill the tall forward/2nd ruckman they stated they were chasing at the start of the trade week?

We really seem to have absolutely whiffed on anything resembling a need or a good deal but then got Cordy at the same size as Howard for no reason other than depth.

It’s not a “bad” trade period cause we haven’t lost anything but it can’t be good cause we haven’t done anything.

I still can’t believe no one managed to convince Bowes that getting his $750k a year for two (or even extending it to four for the same or slightly less) and coming to a team with a spot for him was better than going to Geelong where I actually seen him in the ones for less money… its ****ing staggering

 

[Armoooo]

Bowes will make AA next year, calling it now

 

[SaintWWodonga]

Are we actually doing anything? Is the Haynes deal real?

 

[XhazzafootyX]

Are we actually doing anything? Is the Haynes deal real?

No and no

 

[D2D3]

Future 3rd for pick 7 alone is worth it. FFS Would take Cale Morton on $800k for 2 years just to get that deal.
Ridiculous how this has even happened.

Well at least we know for sure now the whole "AFL's stamp of approval" thing was always rubbish. Such a crazily one sided trade simply should not be allowed regardless of the salaries changing hands. Especially since it involves picks going both ways and the AFL has a value system placed on each pick.

 

[Yawkey way]

But when asked on SEN Breakfast about a trade for Clark, list and recruiting manager Brady Rawlings stated the club will keep discussions going with the Saints.

“He’s certainly someone we’ve got interest in, he’s also had a bit of a bad run the last couple of years (with injuries), he’s been quite unlucky. We think he’s an absolute talent who could really help us, we got the feeling he might be gettable and we felt the door was ajar there and maybe that’s closed now,” Rawlings explained.

Leaves it’s open and clearly says they want to talk to us.

Trade radio said 90% fluff and it’s not happening. Why are so many barracking for a lousy deal to trade out such a talented player, quite bizarre imo.