Okay, we'll have to agree to disagree on Mackenzie's disposal.The colour rankings are largely left up to the individual that writes the profile, so there's a degree of subjectivity there of course.
I've spoken about Ashcrofts disposal before, it is very good for the most part, the only issue I have with it is some of the decision making around his handballing, but he very rarely turns it over. On the flipside, I think Mackenzie's has been overrated a touch, I love how he weights his kicks and is sharp in congestion, but he's more prone to bang the ball on the boot under pressure than an Ashcroft under pressure, so it evens out.
Tsatas varies game to game, sometimes he's fantastic and others he's a shocker, but his technique is fairly solid, just needs to learn to point his foot when he kicks and those up and unders will become less frequent, and I've seen him hit some ridiculous kicks this year but again subjectivity
Another one I don't understand is the rating of Phillipou's endurance as "average".
The guy was top 10 in the 2km time trial and yet was rated as "average" by the draft guide in endurance. But when compared to players like Sheezel, Jones, Hustwaite, Hotton, Mackenzie, Hewett, Clark, Cadman and Allen he is more consistent over long distance than all of these.
I'm not sure what metric the person who wrote Phillipou's profile is working from.
Also Mackenzie's profile stipulates a strength as "stoppage craft" as well as an improvement as "stoppage craft".
So which one is it?
Last edited:




