well if he did it will come out.Anyone who thinks Sayers wasn't complicit is joking themselves. He should be stood down sooner rather than later.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
well if he did it will come out.Anyone who thinks Sayers wasn't complicit is joking themselves. He should be stood down sooner rather than later.
Pollies having a crack calling a businessman dishonest or a liar. Turn it the heck up cretins. A more lying, dishonest, despicable bunch of morons you will not find and they all assemble daily in parliament house (at great expense to the taxpayer).Two elected buffoons carrying on as elected buffoons will do - good luck to them and their chest puffery.
Don’t care whether he was or wasn’t. It’s in the past. I only care about the now and what he’s doing/done as president of our club. So far IMO he’s done well.Anyone who thinks Sayers wasn't complicit is joking themselves. He should be stood down sooner rather than later.
Anyone who thinks Sayers wasn't complicit is joking themselves. He should be stood down sooner rather than later.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He had two or three face to face meetings with an ATO Deputy Commissioner.... who then emailed him.How would he have known?
It's naive to think he didn't. If you've worked in any large corporate environment you know no major decisions are made by middle management. Any decision to share information in order to benefit larger clients over smaller clients (e.g. government) was made by the higher ups. He knew.How would he have known?
It's naive to think he didn't. If you've worked in any large corporate environment you know no major decisions are made by middle management. Any decision to share information in order to benefit larger clients over smaller clients (e.g. government) was made by the higher ups. He knew.
To think that this is even under consideration that he didn't know is a farce.
No idea.I'll have to have a look at it more, but I can see how he could have plausible deniability.
Have the emails from the ATO been released?
You clearly haven't dealt with the ATO. There is always two sides to a story.He had two or three face to face meetings with an ATO Deputy Commissioner.... who then emailed him.
But Sergeant Schulz got him!
I'll have to have a look at it more, but I can see how he could have plausible deniability.
Have the emails from the ATO been released?
Have you ever worked in a Big 4? It is a very different environment to a run of the mill large corporate. It is more of a collective of small businesses or partner thiefdoms that are strung together under a common legal entity and governance model. There's no concept of middle management in these firms.It's naive to think he didn't. If you've worked in any large corporate environment you know no major decisions are made by middle management. Any decision to share information in order to benefit larger clients over smaller clients (e.g. government) was made by the higher ups. He knew.
To think that this is even under consideration that he didn't know is a farce.
Even easier then, the beaucracy would have been non-existent and his little fiefdoms as you describe would be reporting back and giving him and the rest of the exco visibility over the entire mess.Have you ever worked in a Big 4? It is a very different environment to a run of the mill large corporate. It is more of a collective of small businesses or partner thiefdoms that are strung together under a common legal entity and governance model. There's no concept of middle management in these firms.
On SM-S906E using BigFooty.com mobile app
Disagree. Around the time this scandal broke there was nearly 1000 partners in PwC Australia. They cover just about every service line imaginable. You can absolutely fault Sayers for getting the governance and culture wrong and bringing the wrong kinds of people into the partnership. But to me, it feels plausible he could have been oblivious to what was going on in this instance.Even easier then, the beaucracy would have been non-existent and his little fiefdoms as you describe would be reporting back and giving him and the rest of the exco visibility over the entire mess.
dealt with the ATO plenty....You clearly haven't dealt with the ATO. There is always two sides to a story.
From someone who's worked in a similar environment, on the legal side, there is ZERO chance he wasn't all over this....Disagree. Around the time this scandal broke there was nearly 1000 partners in PwC Australia. They cover just about every service line imaginable. You can absolutely fault Sayers for getting the governance and culture wrong and bringing the wrong kinds of people into the partnership. But to me, it feels plausible he could have been oblivious to what was going on in this instance.
Trust me, as someone who spent time in the toxic Big 4 machine, I'm not going to defend it a great deal. Sayers has a lot to answer for what occurred under his watch, but I also think it's possible to give Sayers the benefit of the doubt in this specific instance.
On SM-S906E using BigFooty.com mobile app
Found guilty he likely moves on, it's that simple
Found guilty by who, the Senate enquiry committee? Mate they couldn't find water in Port Phillip Bay.Found guilty he likely moves on, it's that simple
The old crooks line of "I do not recall"..Just go for the Area 51 defence.
Sayers is a blue arsed Liar. That is consultancy culture at its best
You don't care what he's done? Are you serious? The best predictor of the future is the past.Don’t care whether he was or wasn’t. It’s in the past. I only care about the now and what he’s doing/done as president of our club. So far IMO he’s done well.