Remove this Banner Ad

No Oppo Supporters OPPOSITION OBSERVATION XXXVIII

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Really hoping King gets a hold of Frampton tomorrow night.
They have no other tall defender except Darcy Moore - who we know is best suited to being the interceptor.

King $8.50 to kick 5 or more
I think Frampton will give away a lot of FK's away, Ben King is tall & really goes for he's marks.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

all the more logic to the afl wanting a stadium there imo. but it'll quickly be too small if the team is well supported
It will be. Everyone involved in the design of the thing will look like morons once it's obvious that it's not big enough.

It should hold 40,000. It's not gold coast or GWS; people actually follow the game down here.
 
It will be. Everyone involved in the design of the thing will look like morons once it's obvious that it's not big enough.

It should hold 40,000. It's not gold coast or GWS; people actually follow the game down here.
I think the fact the AFL has demanded the stadium be roofed has cut down the capacity. 40/50k would probably add a lot to the cost.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

cfl protecting dangerflog

whos laura kane ? only in the cfl cos shes a woman innit


Why do they even bother asking the AFL for explanation on these things? They pretty much always back the umpires decision no matter what. That’s why umpiring is so trash, because they’re always right according to their bosses.

How bout Selwood as well, he should pick it up and get tackled? Well that would nullify the numbers advantage that the Saints had at the contest.
 
That's what sports has come to now, its all stat padding and not about impact!

hence why the Brownlow means * all except when Dusty won it cause its all about getting 30 touches & gaining 300 metres per game & 24 handballs.
if dusty was a stat padder wouldve won 5 brownlows
 
Why do they even bother asking the AFL for explanation on these things? They pretty much always back the umpires decision no matter what. That’s why umpiring is so trash, because they’re always right according to their bosses.

How bout Selwood as well, he should pick it up and get tackled? Well that would nullify the numbers advantage that the Saints had at the contest.
they changed the rules cos of steve mortis tumbling in to get the ball

another Richmond rule change
 
Why do they even bother asking the AFL for explanation on these things? They pretty much always back the umpires decision no matter what. That’s why umpiring is so trash, because they’re always right according to their bosses.

How bout Selwood as well, he should pick it up and get tackled? Well that would nullify the numbers advantage that the Saints had at the contest.
But Selwood would have picked it up then dropped the knees in the tackle and drawn the free. He fails to realize not every player is a protected species like himself.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top