- Sep 10, 2010
- 18,144
- 25,254
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions

I wonder why neither GC nor Port preferred to deal with North. Their first pick next year should be a good one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
As long as you can get your forward structure sorted, look like you will be very much in the mix again.He simply makes Collingwood a much better side, Perryman adds much needed depth through the middle and with a bit more luck with injuries to key players, Pies will be right back in the hunt next season, Pies are never down for long.
Nah, as long as their young brigade don’t get too ahead of themselves they’re going places, as much as I hate to admit it.And they risk becoming st kilda in terms of not having enough very elite talent to be capable of making a preliminary final.
Good post.Quite the opposite, actually. Do a deep dive into how the Hawks have built their list and you'll be shocked.
In their two finals sides, the Hawks only had three first round selections of their own playing - Watson, Weddle and Ward. They have built a seriously competitive side mostly through shrewd trading (Meek, Chol, D'Ambrosio, Ginnivan, Frost, Scrimshaw, Impey), FAs (Amon) and picking exceptionally well with late picks (Lewis pick 76, Worpel pick 45, Nash rookie, Newcombe MSD, Moore 67, Dear 56, Sicily 56, Hardwick 44, CJ rookie)
If there is one thing the Hawks haven't put on display in their rapid rebuild, it's the need to acquire and nail early selections. Grainger-Barras was a pick 6 and will be delisted whilst Mackenzie and Ward (both pick 7) are not in their best side and don't look inspiring pick ups.
The Hawks have continued to make the most of the players available in trade and free agency by adding Battle and Barrass.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Ports list boss said something that suggested our trade for Dan was never going to be considered and we were never going to moveDoesn’t sound like Carlton were ever in the picture as all their fans seem to believe…
Scuttlebutt going around is that Carlton didn’t have the cap space to accomodate him either, with Weitering to re-sign and TDK likely getting a massive deal next year too.Ports list boss said something that suggested our trade for Dan was never going to be considered and we were never going to move
He’s best friends with JSOS, Ben Silvagni was being classic Ben Silvagni and sooking on X when we didn’t trade for him
So there must’ve been significant links
Ultimately I think Dan has landed at the best club for him
Scuttlebutt going around is that Carlton didn’t have the cap space to accomodate him either, with Weitering to re-sign and TDK likely getting a massive deal next year too.
Suspect that the media leaks of Carlton and North being in the hunt were being fed to the media by Port to try to put pressure on getting a better deal rather than from the clubs in question.
We chased Hayward and Stengle earlier in the year and were supposedly in the hunt for Petracca and Houston when they're names came up.Scuttlebutt going around is that Carlton didn’t have the cap space to accomodate him either, with Weitering to re-sign and TDK likely getting a massive deal next year too.
Suspect that the media leaks of Carlton and North being in the hunt were being fed to the media by Port to try to put pressure on getting a better deal rather than from the clubs in question.
You were supposedly in the hunt for Petracca and Houston but never even made them offers?We chased Hayward and Stengle earlier in the year and were supposedly in the hunt for Petracca and Houston when they're names came up.
To suggest we have no cap space is a bit of a laugh
Blues were fairly clear we were happy to trade for Houston at the right price trade wise.You were supposedly in the hunt for Petracca and Houston but never even made them offers?
Doesn’t much sound like you were in the hunt at all tbh.
Yet you never made him an offer.Blues were fairly clear we were happy to trade for Houston at the right price trade wise.
But please keep spreading false rumours about our cap space which none of us would have a clue about.
According to? Our list manager said otherwiseYet you never made him an offer.
One is the Prison Bars so he's right.
And thank **** for that.During the season was basically communicating with Dees and was destined there... but as time moved on with the off field stuff popping up it changed his mind and was then open to a few clubs.
Blues were fairly clear we were happy to trade for Houston at the right price trade wise.
But please keep spreading false rumours about our cap space which none of us would have a clue about.
how do you know its false if you don't have a clue about it?
i think they made the right decision to head to the draftWanted to play at Carlton but in the end they didn't want him.
Do you think Carlton would be keen on Houston, Hayward, Stengle if they didn't have the cap space to accomodate?
I was impressed and relieved that for once my team had a clear plan from the start (I.e the draft) and didn't jump on the new shiny thing or give in to a saviour complex. Been a long time coming.i think they made the right decision to head to the draft
and to use their salary cap in other areas
i am just happy collingwood came to the party because we were about to blow a future first on him if they didn't come back into the picture and he would've reluctantly joined just to get back to vic once you guys chose not to get himI was impressed and relieved that for once my team had a clear plan from the start (I.e the draft) and didn't jump on the new shiny thing or give in to a saviour complex. Been a long time coming.