Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice 47th President of the United States: Donald Trump - Part 20: If you want Capitalism, you got it

When will Trump be finished?

  • Right now. Bloke's a dickhead.

    Votes: 50 43.5%
  • We'll let him run, we'll wipe him out after the election. Be way funnier that way!

    Votes: 12 10.4%
  • At some point, Trump will wipe out all options except for him. Send him to jail.

    Votes: 11 9.6%
  • Needs to be next president of the ICC.

    Votes: 1 0.9%
  • Clean the swamp, Trump2025!

    Votes: 39 33.9%
  • It's not enough to just elect him, him ahead of anyone else!

    Votes: 2 1.7%

  • Total voters
    115

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mod Notice
* Thread monitored actively. User who drag it down will be removed

Specifically: reference to TDS (Trump Derangement Syndrome) and its counterpart 'Trumpanzee' or anything similar will no longer be allowed.

Personal attacks are also to be kept to a minimum.

Just a reminder, even if it hasn't come up for a few pages and y'all should know this stuff by now:

This thread is not about Covid, lockdowns, or vaccines. It is about Donald Trump. While Trump was in office during the pandemic and his response to Covid is relevant, there are pertinent threads for you to post your opinions on those things in.

It might also do with reminding a few that when you post on the SRP, you are responsible for backing up/verifying your claims to fact. What this means is that you will be asked time to time to support your claims with evidence, to ensure that this forum is as free of misinfomation as we can make it.

Do not post conspiracy theories on this forum. We have an entire other forum for that.

Thanks all.

As always, please submit ideas for the thread title by tagging Gethelred! We're looking for something new to match the new thread!



< - Trump 19 is back there.
 
Last edited:
Uh huh. Also he's just a big softie and Fox News is the best news org on the planet :tearsofjoy:

Like I said mate, ya gotta go a bit more subtle, make it sound like there's a chance someone could actually believe what they're saying.

I actually am speaking my feelings. I've never not said how I feel eg:

ScoMo/Abbott/Howard/Dutton/Trump good

Rudd/Gillard/Albo/Harris bad
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

4d850209dc7ed1f183e4e60720005a79.gif


Biden has authorised lethal force on US citizens, yeah thats some grasp you've got there :tearsofjoy:
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/...dodd/524001p.PDF?ver=UpTwJ66AyyBgvy7wFyTGbA== So this dod directive is just little un fortunate in its timing and some of its wording

But not to worry objective fact checkers that have no vested interests im sure have said there’s nothing to worry about so nothing to see here.
 
Last edited:
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/...dodd/524001p.PDF?ver=UpTwJ66AyyBgvy7wFyTGbA== So this dod directive is just little un fortunate in its timing and some of its wording

But not to worry objective fact checkers that have no vested interests im sure have said there’s nothing to worry about so nothing to see here.

Did you read the link you posted? On the top half of the very first page.

Reissues and Cancels: DoD Directive 5240.01, “DoD Intelligence Activities,” August 27, 2007, as amended

Incorporates and Cancels: DoD 5240.1-R, “Procedures Governing the Activities of DoD Intelligence Components that Affect United States Persons,” December 7, 1982, as amended

This is exactly what everyone has told you. It's an existing DoD directive, that's been in place since the 80s.

Tell me awaremind. Are you a troll? Are you being deliberately disingenous and ignoring things? Are you getting your information from what appear to be unreliable sources, who misrepresent things to you?
 
https://www.esd.whs.mil/Portals/54/...dodd/524001p.PDF?ver=UpTwJ66AyyBgvy7wFyTGbA== So this dod directive is just little un fortunate in its timing and some of its wording

But not to worry objective fact checkers that have no vested interests im sure have said there’s nothing to worry about so nothing to see here.
Yes mate, Fox News as always has a vested interest in running defence for Biden and democrats. A great grasp of things you have there :tearsofjoy:

 
Did you read the link you posted? On the top half of the very first page.





This is exactly what everyone has told you. It's an existing DoD directive, that's been in place since the 80s.

Tell me awaremind. Are you a troll? Are you being deliberately disingenous and ignoring things? Are you getting your information from what appear to be unreliable sources, who misrepresent things to you?
See you are not telling the full story, it has been amended very recently, with a line about using lethal force that wasn’t previously there. However the legal experts from some sources seem to say it’s a nothing burger, but as bezos admitted trust in mainstream sources is at an all time low so it’s rfk jr vs unknown possibly paid off legal experts
 
See you are not telling the full story, it has been amended very recently, with a line about using lethal force that wasn’t previously there. However the legal experts from some sources seem to say it’s a nothing burger, but as bezos admitted trust in mainstream sources is at an all time low so it’s rfk jr vs unknown possibly paid off legal experts
Any how that’s just one thing I’m sure if you’re ganged up 5-1 in a debate trying to answer as many things as you can you wouldn’t have time to vet everything either
 
See you are not telling the full story, it has been amended very recently, with a line about using lethal force that wasn’t previously there. However the legal experts from some sources seem to say it’s a nothing burger, but as bezos admitted trust in mainstream sources is at an all time low so it’s rfk jr vs unknown possibly paid off legal experts
if Greg norman is reporting it must be true
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Agree with that weirdo about the pain thing.

We just disagree on how it happened.

Either a girl broke his heart around the age of 15-18 or he got physically humbled in public and he's never gotten over it.
He is an extreme malignant narcissist - no doubt his childhood has driven unsolvable levels of insecurity and unworthiness into him. He is a flawed human devoid of love and empathy with a constant need to be praised.

I worked for 2 years under a malignant narcissist before i got out - a complete authoritarian who ran the joint as CEO.
The parallels with Trump are eerily similar - culture of zero morality , extreme bullying and sexual harassment , appalling leadership, prodigious staff turnover except for the sycophants who stayed , plus misogyny at every turn - a completely toxic workplace.

Malignant narcissism is a personality flaw which , when as bad as Trump has it , can never be cured :think:
 
He is an extreme malignant narcissist - no doubt his childhood has driven unsolvable levels of insecurity and unworthiness into him. He is a flawed human devoid of love and empathy with a constant need to be praised.

I worked for 2 years under a malignant narcissist before i got out - a complete authoritarian who ran the joint as CEO.
The parallels with Trump are eerily similar - culture of zero morality , extreme bullying and sexual harassment , appalling leadership, prodigious staff turnover except for the sycophants who stayed , plus misogyny at every turn - a completely toxic workplace.

Malignant narcissism is a personality flaw which , when as bad as Trump has it , can never be cured :think:
He’s got a few other strong personalities on his team this time around though, it might either implode or force him to not be so autocratic
 
Any how that’s just one thing I’m sure if you’re ganged up 5-1 in a debate trying to answer as many things as you can you wouldn’t have time to vet everything either

You don't appear to try very hard to vet anything. If you're making quite a big claim like BIDEN AUTHORISED THE DOD TO USE LETHAL FORCE AGAINST AMERICAN CIVILIANS ON AMERICAN SOIL you should probably take a few minutes to fact check it.

See you are not telling the full story, it has been amended very recently, with a line about using lethal force that wasn’t previously there. However the legal experts from some sources seem to say it’s a nothing burger, but as bezos admitted trust in mainstream sources is at an all time low so it’s rfk jr vs unknown possibly paid off legal experts


This seems inaccurate.
 
He’s got a few other strong personalities on his team this time around though, it might either implode or force him to not be so autocratic
One of the key traits is they get rid of anyone who disagrees with them.
Trump can be easily manipulated - praise is his kryptonite , use the carrot and not the stick with him and you're good.
I don't see a Pence, Mattis, Kelly , Preibus or Tillerson this time around - just yes men and sycophants................
 
One of the key traits is they get rid of anyone who disagrees with them.
Trump can be easily manipulated - praise is his kryptonite , use the carrot and not the stick with him and you're good.
I don't see a Pence, Mattis, Kelly , Preibus or Tillerson this time around - just yes men and sycophants................
Those guys were the swamp creatures he promised to get rid of, Elon , Tulsi, Rfk jr at least are strong and principled people.
 
I actually am speaking my feelings. I've never not said how I feel eg:

ScoMo/Abbott/Howard/Dutton/Trump good

Rudd/Gillard/Albo/Harris bad
So how do you handle Howard's comments that Trump's actions after losing the 2020 election were not compatible with democracy?

Just a difference of opinion over an unimportant issue?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

One of the key traits is they get rid of anyone who disagrees with them.
Trump can be easily manipulated - praise is his kryptonite , use the carrot and not the stick with him and you're good.
I don't see a Pence, Mattis, Kelly , Preibus or Tillerson this time around - just yes men and sycophants................

Graeme Hancock has all the answers to the difficult problems
 
So how do you handle Howard's comments that Trump's actions after losing the 2020 election were not compatible with democracy?

Just a difference of opinion over an unimportant issue?
Howard was worse than trump as a divisive Machiavellian demagogue way
 
See you are not telling the full story, it has been amended very recently, with a line about using lethal force that wasn’t previously there. However the legal experts from some sources seem to say it’s a nothing burger, but as bezos admitted trust in mainstream sources is at an all time low so it’s rfk jr vs unknown possibly paid off legal experts
Help me out here mate. An honest answer please, if you can.

Why in the everloving **** would Fox News go along with these paid off experts and run an article debunking an attack on Biden?
 
Any how that’s just one thing I’m sure if you’re ganged up 5-1 in a debate trying to answer as many things as you can you wouldn’t have time to vet everything either

Mostly because Trump supporters can never back up any of their arguments, get called on talking vibes-based bullshit, then bail out of the thread complaining that right wing opinions aren't allowed.
Like clockwork.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top