- Aug 3, 2015
- 4,408
- 5,542
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
If you agreed with me, my mode of expression wouldn't be an issue for you. But because you don't, it"s always much easier to discredit the form rather than the content for lazy minds .Curious whether you talk like this in everyday real-life interactions. Sorry, let my re-phrase that such that you might better understand.
Pray tell, might I inquire as to the reasoning behind your rather peculiar mode of verbal expression? Your choice of phrasing and intonation strikes me as somewhat abrasive, bordering on the insufferably pompous, and rather reminiscent of an individual who exudes an air of unwarranted superiority. One might even venture to suggest that your discourse possesses an uncanny tendency to evoke the impression of someone rather, shall we say, disagreeable and unrefined in social graces.
To rephrase it for you:
If you agreed with me you wouldn't care about the language. But because you don't, and you're too lazy or simply not able to argue your case, you choose the easy option of diverting attention to the style of expression rather than what's actually being said.
Is that better? Maybe, but the previous version was much more concise.




