100%Or start him to shut someone down.
But FFS, don't use him as sub.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
100%Or start him to shut someone down.
But FFS, don't use him as sub.
Skills under pressure.Let’s be honest, that game last night pretty much sums up our season. It’s been average without being great. I think outside the Dogs, Swans, GWS and crows game (north doesn’t count) we have just been ok..
We really lack polish and skills under pressure and silly little mistakes cost us every damn week. How many skill errors last night cost us? I think I counted 6 goals from turnovers, that’s just not good enough.
Guys like Moore, Mass, CJ, McKenzie, (Harry to a lesser extent, I think been ok this year) have all played well below their best, and unfortunately without Day our midfield just gets smacked most weeks.
outside the obvious of getting a few players back, Scrim, Lewis, and maybe a Weddle , we clearly need to hit the draft and find ourselves a gun midfielder.
disappointment is the best way to describe this, an opportunity lost.
With what Worpel and Mackenzie are offering offensively you lose nothing replacing them with Finn as a tagger. You as may as well take their best mid out of game and lose nothing on other end with replacing one of the other two. I know he was subbed but i would keep Mackenzie over Worpel. Worps is too similar to Newk and Nash. Still believe in Frenchie. Rather pump games into him now than Worps.Or start him to shut someone down.
But FFS, don't use him as sub.
Have to agree here. We all know Finn's limitations around disposal. But his elite attribute is endurance and shutting down role. He either is in the team for a full game to tag or not at all. The benefit of playing him for four quarters in a tagging role is that he wears down his opponent and then in the fourth he should be getting opportunity as his opponent won't be as fresh.Sam was outcoached again. Needed to tag Serong. Why else play Finn?
I have never seen a player miss as many tackles as CJ tonight. Scrim needs to come in for him. McKenzie out for Butler. Worpel for Day in a fortnight. Chol really struggles v good teams. Not sure how to get a Lewis in the team, but we must. Sicily was OK. I thought we were poor all night not sure how we were in front. We lack leadership. We panicked.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
You bring in Seamus if you drop CJ. Scrim is fighting Battle and Sicily for a spot.Agree. We dont lost any run replacing CJ with Scrimshaw. Maybe the appearance of dash, but Scrimshaw can move the ball quicker and more precisely than CJ can run.
He is exactly what we need in the team. Self-assured with ball in hand and has a bit of c*nt in him.
People talk about needing to have another A grade mid (which is Day when fit). Which I do agree with. But when other teams have two A grade mids and we have only one then the best way forward is to play Finn and negate one of their A grade mids.With what Worpel and Mackenzie are offering offensively you lose nothing replacing them with Finn as a tagger. You as may as well take their best mid out of game and lose nothing on other end with replacing one of the other two. I know he was subbed but i would keep Mackenzie over Worpel. Worps is too similar to Newk and Nash. Still believe in Frenchie. Rather pump games into him now than Worps.
100% agree with this. I get the back your own system when it backed up with a high level of talent. Eg if we had 3 A grade mids you would back your system. But with just Newc and a bunch of role players or young player's, we need to negate the opposition best player. I don't know why Sam has gone away from tagging, when it worked well at the back end of 23.With what Worpel and Mackenzie are offering offensively you lose nothing replacing them with Finn as a tagger. You as may as well take their best mid out of game and lose nothing on other end with replacing one of the other two. I know he was subbed but i would keep Mackenzie over Worpel. Worps is too similar to Newk and Nash. Still believe in Frenchie. Rather pump games into him now than Worps.
We are risking us scoring more than the oppo overall knowing we will get opened up badly at times.
Saints easily could have beaten us last week and last night really we should have won if we kicked a bit straighter but more so freo didnt. Our DE was down last night and that hurt us too. A few critical turnovers and missed shots at goal and we retain control.
It’s a risky game plan based on us winning more ball and retaining it to set up scores. I think it shows in selection with McKenzie getting a gig two weeks in a row despite poor form and Finn not coming in to tag.
it’s so clear to the eye we need breakaway speed in the centre square but we refuse to change it up. And we need more zip at half forward. It’s a tough watch at present.

My own amateur assessment is that Sam doesn't foresee us playing a tagger when we're playing in PFs and GFs and he wants our game-plan to reflect that.100% agree with this. I get the back your own system when it backed up with a high level of talent. Eg if we had 3 A grade mids you would back your system. But with just Newc and a bunch of role players or young player's, we need to negate the opposition best player. I don't know why Sam has gone away from tagging, when it worked well at the back end of 23.
I disagree and please leave the race card out it clearly had nothing to do with that. Chol won’t and shouldn’t be dropped for one bad game but it was a bad game and he is rightfully criticised. CJ was appalling as must be dropped, same Mackenzie and I would add Moore. Nothing to do with skin colour just performance and if you read the post, it’s a like for like replacement. Are you proposing that Lewis comes in for Gunston or Dear instead and that the poster should have also drawn that conclusion, else he is racist? Going on last night they were both better than Chol so either he goes out, you manage Jack (as dear won’t go out as just came back and was good) or you don’t do a like for like which would be problematic.The calls for Chol to be dropped are astonishing. Wonder if he looked different would they be the same.
Last I heard he was on track for a R20 return. Haven't heard whether its via the magoos or not.I actually thought Finn was good when he came on. Gave us more than McKenzie.
Next week won't be easy, but Port do have their share of injuries now.
Are we sneaky chance of bringing Day in early?

Not at all but his game was unbalanced.
Typical for some on Big Footy after a loss.Season's over, play the kids, plan for next season's tilt at a top four spot. We're just making up the numbers.
Haha I was wondering where the 3rd goal came fromAnyone notice that Conor MacDonald's soccer goal was later attributed to Dear.
Dear has a habit of not wanting his team mates to score.![]()
WTF?Been a tough year. Supporters were hoping we would continue on from last seasons form where we steam rolled teams in the second half of the year and it hasn’t happened.
So many players form has dropped right off from last year which for me has been tough.