- Oct 4, 2015
- 16,261
- 32,281
- AFL Club
- Carlton
They didn't trade Thilthorpe in the process, or they would have stayed 15th.
Oh, their best young key forward who wants to be at the club?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
They didn't trade Thilthorpe in the process, or they would have stayed 15th.
I don’t understand what you’re asking?"Similar to Charlie" nope, not what I asked...
Think a star player from a team... I'll give you Bryce Gibbs as an example...
And a player, they’ve payed far more way for overs for good and also less type players of talent, whomever it is the club pays through the roof…Walter and 2 future firsts.
Nah we were all the bog standard bunch out at recess, in a trade circle with the duffel coats on , "Got'im, Got'im, Need'im"Flicks for footy cards, closest to the wall or card stands on wall for win…
Lee Street primary school, mates or then anywhere else there was a challenge…
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I don’t understand what you’re asking?
But Gibbs was a midfielder, and we didn’t trade him when he first asked, and then we got our price a year later when he only had 2 years to go on his contract.
In that ‘reality’, Charlie isn’t getting traded.Just accept reality, if we trade Charlie, we aren't getting established star players in return.
Moyle replaces Witts, also capable as a pinch hit forward, Read genuine future ruck/forward who keeps developing forward with small stints in the ruck…Pretty sure Ned Moyle is what they had planned to be the long term replacement for Witts.
In that ‘reality’, Charlie isn’t getting traded.
Which is the most likely outcome.
But that will cost GCFC one of their Academy picks too, won’t it?Id like to see us go after Flanders, shores up either the HB or HF for us. Walter+flanders+F1+swap of 1sts this year would be great for curnow
But that will cost GCFC one of their Academy picks too, won’t it?
How does that position us with Dean (unless bids are shored up, incl GCFC’s as well)
One of my new cousins grandson is most disappointed with all the losses this year. But he still supports the Blues! He is a massive Crippa and Harry fan. Charlie... yeah... sort of.My 6yo let out a sad sigh when I told him JSOS and TDK were going to the Saints and Charlie might be leaving too. But he gave a big "Yay!" when I told him we'd be getting better players instead.
Point 1: Winning games are important for kids than individual players.
Point 2: Please don't disappoint us Austin![]()
1978-81 primary school, scanllens sets, remember they had the footy pictures on the back (jigsaw type) which you could make a large picture c from the cards, chewy strips, can’t remember exactly all of them but sure there were a few with blues pies tigers matches from memory..Nah we were all the bog standard bunch out at recess, in a trade circle with the duffel coats on , "Got'im, Got'im, Need'im"
The 1977 cards are the earliest I remember collecting, but my mate had some from '73. Must have got them from his dad or something. https://www.footycardguide.com.au/scanlens/
Lee st represent !Flicks for footy cards, closest to the wall or card stands on wall for win…
Lee Street primary school, mates or then anywhere else there was a challenge…
Or what his management can broker / orchestrate on behalf of CC’s “de$ire”.That, I can sort of agree with.
It will really boil down to how badly Charlie wants to leave, and how much we desire to keep a player on our list who has told the club he wants out...
Had the duffel coats (had Harmesy)Nah we were all the bog standard bunch out at recess, in a trade circle with the duffel coats on , "Got'im, Got'im, Need'im"
The 1977 cards are the earliest I remember collecting, but my mate had some from '73. Must have got them from his dad or something. https://www.footycardguide.com.au/scanlens/
As it stands, they're around 1500 points short of what they will need for their academy players. They will almost certainly want to trade out pick 6 (7) for more points on the night. Trading down to 11 will hurt them considerably. Not to say they won't for a player of Curnow's calibre, but to do so, they'll need to find more points elsewhere.If we swap the TDK pick (#11) for their #7, they should still be able to pay for their academy players.
As for Dean, we will still have the Silvagni compo to pay for that.
No disrespect, I get we all love the club and want to see us improve, but some of us need to take off the blue glasses for a minute and think about what a good deal for Charlie looks like.
I love Charlie and at his best he’s the most entertaining player in the game. No one is saying that you trade him for under just to get him out the door, but there is some serious overestimation of what his worth is.
Charlie had a pretty average year this year. Yes, it’s because of injuries and lack of preseason, but that’s the problem - he had four surgeries this year to clean up a knee that kept him out of the game for a couple of years. Yes, he came back and was a dominant player for a few years, but there is no guarantee that he gets back there.
He’s said twice he wants to stay - both times where when he couldn’t avoid the media. It’s what he has to say because he knows that he probably can’t get out of his contract, and he probably does have to come back next year. But he doesn’t want to be here next year.
He has told the club, face to face, I’d be happy to play somewhere else. He’s met with an opposition coach. He’s authorised his manager to leak meetings and spread stories, or at the least hasn’t shut him down. He jetted off overseas and hasn’t posted a socials message trying to shut this down.
A deal probably can’t be done, as yes, we will want overs. But overs for Charlie isn’t as high as you all seem to think. He’s 29 at the start of next season, has a pretty significant injury history and is coming off a down year. The multiple first rounders is fanciful. So is all the first choice Swans and GC players, as is Butters.
A ‘win’ in a trade sense is a deal that improves both teams. It’s not about the picks, points, or players - it’s about coming out as a better team. Adelaide went from 15 to 1 this year adding 3 best 22 players that weren’t big names - the kind of players folks around here would turn their noses up at. Same folks who still think we didn’t get enough back for Kennedy last year because he did alright in a team that still missed finals. Charlie for Walter, and someone else in the 23-26 age bracket would be a more than fair deal that improves both teams.
I don’t have my head in the sand, but I’m realistic about what a good deal for us could look like. I think the most likely option is that Charlie stays - mainly because the club knows that they have to be seen to ‘win’ to keep members happy, and a deal like that is too hard. I doubt he will ever play at the level he did a few years ago with us, but he’s still box office when he’s on. It’s either that or a deal that everyone here hates, but actually improves us in the long run. No matter what we do, half of us are going to say we did the wrong thing.
Gold Coast need more points as things stand, they're not fine. They have other top 30 academy prospects.If we swap the TDK pick (#11) for their #7, they should still be able to pay for their academy players.
As for Dean, we will still have the Silvagni compo to pay for that.
Jeremy Cameron was traded to Geelong in 2020 as a 28yo coming off an injury riddled last season with GWS which amounted to just 24 goals…
With the Cats he’s earnt THREE All Australian’s, kicked over 300 goals, won a Coleman Medal and is as dominant as ever right now at 32.
Be very careful of ‘underselling’ Charlie Curnow who is also 28 right now. That’s all I’d say.
As it stands, they're around 1500 points short of what they will need for their academy players. They will almost certainly want to trade out pick 6 (7) for more points on the night. Trading down to 11 will hurt them considerably. Not to say they won't for a player of Curnow's calibre, but to do so, they'll need to find more points elsewhere.