Col and I are here till it's throughAre you still here promoting this batshit crazy proposal?
.Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Col and I are here till it's throughAre you still here promoting this batshit crazy proposal?
.Right.Those won in the Premier competition of the day.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I have read his book.You have so many questions, which is understandable. You should really read his book. Sold out on Amazon it's been so popular.
View attachment 2468071
It doesn't count unless you counted it from the start lol, you don't get to pick and choose your start date.One feature of extending the VFL/AFL competition's history to 1870, is that the AFL could claim to be the oldest continuous football championship in the world. Currently England's FA Cup soccer has that distinction
I have read his book.
It is full of logical fallacies, erroneous historical research, deductive reasoning that is flawed.
There's one on the front cover. "Reclaiming the AFL competition's earliest era".Can you give just two examples then so we can review your assertion?
More likely….One feature of extending the VFL/AFL competition's history to 1870, is that the AFL could claim to be the oldest continuous football championship in the world. Currently England's FA Cup soccer has that distinction
For starters, It was a tournament, not a football league/competion. It was also only run about 20 times, no? Clutching at straws a bit with this one chief.Now, can you answer my question: if we're tallying champions of the premier football competition, why is the Championship of Australia not the premier football competition?
Ok, so what league/competition did Melbourne win in 1870 that we're counting to add to the tally? Was it a tournament, league/competition, a random assortment of games, what?For starters, It was a tournament, not a football league/competion. It was also only run about 20 times, no? Clutching at straws a bit with this one chief.
If you've read his book like you claim, I am surprised you don't know this.Ok, so what league/competition did Melbourne win in 1870 that we're counting to add to the tally? Was it a tournament, league/competition, a random assortment of games, what?
Sure... so let's rewrite history to claim a record. RidiculousOne feature of extending the VFL/AFL competition's history to 1870, is that the AFL could claim to be the oldest continuous football championship in the world. Currently England's FA Cup soccer has that distinction
It was a cup competition essentially.I have read his book.
It is full of logical fallacies, erroneous historical research, deductive reasoning that is flawed.
Now, can you answer my question: if we're tallying champions of the premier football competition, why is the Championship of Australia not the premier football competition?
So, from the AFL….Sure... so let's rewrite history to claim a record. Ridiculous
But the VFA was only established in 1877, it was the first Victorian league.It was a cup competition essentially.
It is wasn't the "Premier competition of the day" - it was a local state / metro based comp played by local ametuer players.Those won in the Premier competition of the day.
Ah, the ultimate logic question of the AFL……But the VFA was only established in 1877, it was the first Victorian league.
Then why are we counting 1870-1876, non-league seasons as having a premier then?
There are absolutely no Victorians other than Geelong folk that have this supposed chip on their shoulder mateIt is wasn't the "Premier competition of the day" - it was a local state / metro based comp played by local ametuer players.
Hate this argument from Victorians have a weird chip on their shoulder - there was no premier competition until the 80s. Before that they were local leagues - the VFL was equivalent to the SANFL and WAFL. On average, VFL may have had better footballers, but in any given year teams in each league could potentially beat teams in other state leagues.
I think we all understand his arguments. He wants more Geelong premierships recognised. It is as simple as that.Tell me you don't understand Col's arguments without telling me.
Yeah, why did you then?Yeah, you're cooked brother, but this not the place to go into that now.
Pains me to admit but Port Adelaide won some championship of Australia comps: they have a legit claim according to one wobbly part of Cols disjointed and irrational brainfart, but he faila to address it.It is wasn't the "Premier competition of the day" - it was a local state / metro based comp played by local ametuer players.
Hate this argument from Victorians have a weird chip on their shoulder - there was no premier competition until the 80s. Before that they were local leagues - the VFL was equivalent to the SANFL and WAFL. On average, VFL may have had better footballers, but in any given year teams in each league could potentially beat teams in other state leagues.
Another case Cols brain failure to register. Mysteriously if it doesn't bolster Geelong somehow its less important. No AFL flags for Geelong Grammar Col you dufus? Somehow Carltons dominant side of the 1860s misses, its too early to be the earliest era?I wonder how much flags the Kaurna people won back in the Marngrook days.
Nah, that's just a collateral advantage.I think we all understand his arguments. He wants more Geelong premierships recognised. It is as simple as that.
.I would bet my bottom dollar that you haven't even read his book. You get so angry just thinking about Col. You'd start tearing it up on the first page..I'm truly worried how you will take it when his proposal goes through..This crap book posits a thesis by a dumbarse (historically speaking) for dumbarses (literally speaking).
And Geelong accepted his pretend cups
![]()
Grand Final history? There were no grand finals until at least 1888Nah, that's just a collateral advantage.
As a revered football historian, Col cares greatly about correctly restoring Grand Final history.
He is just trying to restore the records to what they showed before the historical revisionists of the 1930s came along and changed them. He is just trying to put things right again.