Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Why. If you put a 5 year deal in front of him and he signs. Where is the risk. if he wants out part way, he is under contract and club he wants to go to needs to pay up. Also, if he did pen a long term deal with us if that was the player and we convinced him to come, why would he do that if he was wanting out?You'd really want a cleverly constructed contract or be very certain of his future intentions if you were going to pony up serious collateral for Sanders.
Even a fit racheleNone of those bar Rankine are zippy, crumbing small forwards. Given we want Rankine to have decent midfield minutes, it's probably our biggest need outside a quick, ball using mid. The amount of time the ball was on the ground in our forward line during that Collingwood final and we had no ground ball presence...we win that game with Rankine or a quality crumbing forward in the side.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
A lot of good judges see Mitch Marsh as a tall wingman/high half forward with his tank and penetrating kick.Given Cumming and Sharp are likely to be long gone before we could even entertain trading up in the draft, I can't see us doing it this year. Personally it seems like a good option not to. That future first might come in very handy next year either in the draft or in the trade market.
I also don't see us taking Marsh. Just doesn't seem like the right fit for us. I think we would go for Oskar Taylor if available or Harley Barker.
My take on Hamish's comments:
We are very prepared to trade our 2026 1st to move up this year. There's someone we want.
However... "we really like next year's crop of SA draftees" is a lie to retain the value of that pick in any swap.
Well..... it is tomorrow anyway.It is DRAFT day everyone
FWIW I really like Barker
From way out
Anyway enjoy all xx
Must go do cyclone preps here in Darwin
YepAre they still doing the 1st round on 1 night and then the rest the next?
I just come back from South AussieWell..... it is tomorrow anyway.
But stay safe.
That hail was in a very narrow band, you were unlucky to cop it !!!I just come back from South Aussie
Cold even endured a hail storm
Arrgh I was thinking it was Wednesday
Haha worst flu
Thanks for getting my days straight
I’ll provide commentary on the night
Maybe 2 days later xx
Given Cumming and Sharp are likely to be long gone before we could even entertain trading up in the draft, I can't see us doing it this year. Personally it seems like a good option not to. That future first might come in very handy next year either in the draft or in the trade market.
I also don't see us taking Marsh. Just doesn't seem like the right fit for us. I think we would go for Oskar Taylor if available or Harley Barker.
He's a geniusAlso that way fans won’t complain when it doesn’t happen
We were in MannumThat hail was in a very narrow band, you were unlucky to cop it !!!
I get it, the head honcho's at the club have got withdrawal symptoms for letting go the big easy and want to relive that danceCavanagh has us taking Marsh.
Also another to link us to Ludowyke.
Ludo is an interesting one…great size and should fill out with his big frame, reasonable athlete and a fluent albeit inconsistent kick. Willing to apply defensive pressure too. Also very young, turns 18 on draft night.
Still prefer Marsh by some way though and that’s without considering the local factor.
Ludo is prone to double grabbing and a real confidence player. For a bloke his height he drops too many marks.
Cal's "Late Mail" phantom is usually on the money.Assuming Twomey's is the only phantom worth any salt?
ESPN's 'full draft' phantom has us taking Marsh, and then nothing else. Not even a mention of what happens with our other picks. Curtin not taken at all.
Can undrafted rookies be taken as SSPs?
Cavanagh has us taking Marsh.
Also another to link us to Ludowyke.
Ludo is an interesting one…great size and should fill out with his big frame, reasonable athlete and a fluent albeit inconsistent kick. Willing to apply defensive pressure too. Also very young, turns 18 on draft night.
Still prefer Marsh by some way though and that’s without considering the local factor.
Ludo is prone to double grabbing and a real confidence player. For a bloke his height he drops too many marks.
sanfl.com.au