I don’t get why he just didn’t t own up to his actions and take responsibility.What wealth does to people man. Entitled POS's.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I don’t get why he just didn’t t own up to his actions and take responsibility.What wealth does to people man. Entitled POS's.
His son has been convicted of rape. It’s beyond believing your son. Do you understand the law or are you a sovereign citizen?No, it's not an issue that he's supporting his son, and choosing to believe his son. Not an issue at all.
I'd be surprised if you wouldn't do the the same, in his position. It's easy to cast judgement on him from a distance, though.
I don’t get why he just didn’t t own up to his actions and take responsibility.
I know.maintain his innocence? consider an appeal? clear this name? oh dear
There might have been an argument that this could have been a case of his word against hers, with no clear evidence. But when he faked the uber receipt, that was the admission of guilt. He would not have tried to cover up the crime if he was innocent.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
“He told the court Silvagni had suffered additional punishment from the extensive media attention, following the suppression over his identity being lifted on Thursday.
Silvagni should also receive a lighter sentence because his time in custody would be more difficult due to his poor mental health and risk of suicide, Mr Hallowes said.”
How do Lawyers sleep at night..
You're either incapable of seeing, or simply ignoring the human element of this.His son has been convicted of rape. It’s beyond believing your son. Do you understand the law or are you a sovereign citizen?
Law doesnt always get it right...fully understand why sos is sticking by his son. Would be an absolute campaigner if he didn't.His son has been convicted of rape. It’s beyond believing your son. Do you understand the law or are you a sovereign citizen?
Was about to post the same thing, I get wanting to support his son but what the **** is SOS doing being the one to provide statements declaring his son's innocence? Have the lawyers that he's paying the big money handle that side of things. Especially when Silvagni is making these statements after he wasn't even willing to hear the victim's impact statement.I know.
What I find interesting is Silvagni is the one getting a platform here.
I know he's high profile and so he brings in views to the news etc but that's kind of the problem too.
Rape is always violent in nature, even without hitting or a threat to kill.
*found guiltyGot caught or found guilty?
I’d imagine it was the most compelling piece of evidence.
This a bit harsh. You can't punish him (and the rest of his family) for his kid's crime. Well you can I spose but its not really fair. Plenty of otherwise good people believe stupid stuff.If St Kilda was a respectable club they would part ways with Silvagni immediately. But it's St Kilda.
Because he has been given a platform and rightly or wrongly is desperate to get his kid out of prisonI know.
What I find interesting is Silvagni is the one getting a platform here.
I know he's high profile and so he brings in views to the news etc but that's kind of the problem too.
Can't happen in criminal trials as the police/prosecution are the ones taking the case to trial, not the accuser.
And yes it's a criminal act to try and pay off the state.
Civil cases you can pay off prior to trial though, well in the states you can. Am sure it'd be the same here.
Fool...this had zero to do with stkildaIf St Kilda was a respectable club they would part ways with Silvagni immediately. But it's St Kilda.
As he's breaking down in tears. Possibly because he realises what he is saying is factually wrong.Well his son is a convicted rapist and he is publicly proclaiming his innocence. As a high profile employee of your cub, you don’t think that might be an issue and a distraction for your club?
Gets it right most of the time, particularly a jury trialLaw doesnt always get it right...fully understand why sos is sticking by his son. Would be an absolute campaigner if he didn't.
But it does now.Fool...this had zero to do with stkilda
If St Kilda was a respectable club they would part ways with Silvagni immediately. But it's St Kilda.
No, it doesn't lolBut it does now.
But it does now.
A father standing by his son. You'd (hopefully) do the same.An employee publically shunning victims of rape.
Ain't a good look for an employer.
He might just be emotionally ****ed up cos of what's happened too.Was about to post the same thing, I get wanting to support his son but what the **** is SOS doing being the one to provide statements declaring his son's innocence? Have the lawyers that he's paying the big money handle that side of things. Especially when Silvagni is making these statements after he wasn't even willing to hear the victim's impact statement.
Can only guess his lawyers are thinking that having his tearful famous father saying to a ton of press that his son is innocent is more beneficial to an appeal than the lawyers doing it in front of a much smaller audience, and they know better than me so I guess they might be right?
A father standing by his son. You'd (hopefully) do the same.
That it wasn't him and he didn't do itWhat was his defense?