- Dec 9, 2015
- 12,669
- 21,018
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Goodes easilyNot relevant to anything but I would love it if we have 22 Prime Goodes, 22 Prime Pavlich's and 22 Prime Bonts and had some games between the three teams to see which team would win.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Goodes easilyNot relevant to anything but I would love it if we have 22 Prime Goodes, 22 Prime Pavlich's and 22 Prime Bonts and had some games between the three teams to see which team would win.

Nah in that game I was thinking "how good are Brisbane? Definitely loading up on them next week"
Have a squizz at the Brownlow odds to see who's the best![]()
![]()
Goodes easily![]()
Generally a pretty good player is pre-season Brownlow faveUm, so you think Brownlow odds are a good indcation of, well anything?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Just another data point, in addition to the multitude of data points that has Daicos as #1.Um, so you think Brownlow odds are a good indcation of, well anything?
Generally a pretty good player is pre-season Brownlow fave
When it's an obvious favourite, well that obviously says something too
Yeah but Goodes was a freaking animal, he'd stomp the other twoI like to think so but I am biased. I do think though that Goodes, Pavlich and Bontempelli are all in the same sort of category of big players who could play in almost any position on the field and play it at either at an AA level or very close to it.
I can't remember the last time a player who might scrape into the top 10 in the comp as a $4.50 Brownlow fave heading into the season...Generally a pretty good player is pre-season Brownlow fave
When it's an obvious favourite, well that obviously says something too
Being a tiger finals performances would have a bit of bearingGreat, everyone has a different opinion. I'd say at least 80% would rate Butters higher than Serong. You don't, and that's fine....but when you watch them play I don't believe Serong is really that close to the level of Butters. Butters will be offered $2m+ per year end of 2026 - no way Serong would command that sort of coin, and for good reason. But if you rate Serong higher that's fine, I just don't see it.
I think only Collingwood supporters would rank Daicos ahead of the Bont.
Who from the 'other half' would you consider better than Bont and Daicos?It is still the Brownlow though, so it is only an award for half the players in the AFL, not the other half.
Surprised Ed Richards isn't favouriteI can't remember the last time a player who might scrape into the top 10 in the comp as a $4.50 Brownlow fave heading into the season...
Too many other superstars in the midfield in the mid table side taking votes from him...Surprised Ed Richards isn't favourite
Sanders and FreijahToo many other superstars in the midfield in the mid table side taking votes from him...
Who from the 'other half' would you consider better than Bont and Daicos?
I guess the answer is no.Would prefer we stop the Daicos is the best or not chat. There is another thread for that.
Really? Thanks for explaining that...Any key forward, key defender, small forward, half backs etc are not going to be winning the Brownlow.
Clearly?Also I think Cameron, Gawn, Bont are clearly better than Daicos, with Andrews, being close. I also love Sam Taylor, wish he was at the Swans
He's just fishing, no one is better than Daics atmReally? Thanks for explaining that...
Clearly?
So jump in a time machine back to the start of 2023, and you're taking Gawn or Cameron ahead of Daicos to represent you for the next 3 years?
Oh boy.

"AA bench" is now a burn![]()
You're building a team going into 2026, and you can have as your starting midfielders:"AA bench" is now a burn![]()
Hopefully the snub inspires Him to even greater heightsWell it is if you are supposedly "the bestest player to every of existed"
I like the use of 'Him'.Hopefully the snub inspires Him to even greater heights
Hopefully the snub inspires Him to even greater heights
Certainly a brutal and uncalled for snub which won't be forgotten quickly, the whole selection panel is on noticeAgain though, if you have people claiming he is the best player in the game then the standard is higher, so the AA bench is a failure.