Banter FOOTY Banter! - Who will be better in 2026? Carlton or Collingwood Part 9

[CarmenSandiego]

Yes. It's an embarrassingly bad look to have Pendlebury on the list. FMD. Has all that banging of your head due to Blues incompetence given you brain trauma. FMD.

You’re the one who said he’s not good enough to play against the good sides.

Never heard of a club keeping a player on the playing list to intentionally not play big games.

 

[Fadge]

You’re the one who said he’s not good enough to play against the good sides.

Misrepresentation, or lack of comprehension.

Hard to know with you blokes...

 

[CarmenSandiego]

I hate to say it, but I think Pendles is done against the good midfields. I don't think we would have drawn with Hawthorn if he was playing. We had to get him out of the centre square against the Cats and Heeney and Warner wouldn't be pretty.

Pretty straightforward take here, Fadge

But get your leotard out show me those beautiful mental gymnastics you’ve been practicing since your first day of remedial class, sunshine.

 

[Fadge]

Pretty straightforward take here, Fadge

But get your leotard out show me those beautiful mental gymnastics you’ve been practicing since your first day of remedial class, sunshine.

One poster's opinion doesn't make it fact, sunshine.

He's a pretty handy 4th or 5th banana when the stakes are at their highest, particularly if he's kept fresh.

 

[CarmenSandiego]

One poster's opinion doesn't make it fact, sunshine.

He's a pretty handy 4th or 5th banana when the stakes are at their highest, particularly if he's kept fresh.

Not surprising you disagree with the only Collingwood supporter who’s capable of making sense occasionally.

Very predictable.

 

[Fadge]

Not surprising you disagree with the only Collingwood supporter who’s capable of making sense occasionally.

Very predictable.

'Making sense occasionally' = 'on the rare occasion he says something you agree with'?

Your takes continue to be embarrassing.

 

[CarmenSandiego]

'Making sense occasionally' = 'on the rare occasion he says something you agree with'?

Your takes continue to be embarrassing.

lol cry more.

 

[Fadge]

Don’t be mad that we are likely winning the flag.

Remember this one, Carmen?

Or the post immediately prior, where you were going to be 2 and 2 by the time you met Collingwood, and roll us by 12 goals...

 

[CarmenSandiego]

Remember this one, Carmen?

Or the post immediately prior, where you were going to be 2 and 2 by the time you met Collingwood, and roll us by 12 goals...

a grow man who spends all day every arguing with people about stats & spreadsheets on an internet forum is completely incapable of detecting sarcasm, and doesn’t understand the concept of not taking everything so…. literally.

I’m shocked

 

[CarmenSandiego]

Carlton win a practice match.

I make a silly post about Carlton ‘likely’ winning the flag.

Fadge tries to use it as receipts months later.

Unreal stuff.

 

[Fadge]

a grow man who spends all day every arguing with people about stats & spreadsheets on an internet forum is completely incapable of detecting sarcasm, and doesn’t understand the concept of not taking everything so…. literally.

I’m shocked

So you didn't expect to be 2 and 2 after 4 games (such a high bar)?

 

[Worm4]

Hardly living vicariously. My team win enough games of their own.

But would be quite funny to see Carlton one spot closer to a spoon.

4 out of 9 is enough, how invigorating for you

 

[Worm4]

Well it is your only win for the season, so yeah...

I'm actually referencing Carlton's best result of the season with that comment.

You do realise how dumb your original statement was, surely ?

 

[CarmenSandiego]

So you didn't expect to be 2 and 2 after 4 games (such a high bar)?

No I expected us to be undefeated because I predicted us to win the flag - how could I not after our practice matches? Didn’t you see my very serious post?

 

[Fadge]

4 out of 9 is enough, how invigorating for you

That's the win ratio that Carlton managed when their list peaked after two decades of building and rebuilding.

Poor, pathetic Bloosers.

 

[CarmenSandiego]

do you mean delusional or disillusioned?

if we were the latter, we wouldn't be talking ourselves up as a premiership certainty (we are).

Here’s another one for you Fadge

 

[Fadge]

You do realise how dumb your original statement was, surely ?

You (now) realise how utterly shit your football team is? Surely?

 

[Worm4]

Sounds like he’s on the list for good vibez tbh.

Pendles party >>>>> winning games.

Hope they keep him on the list and nurse him through to 500. Blokes got no dough, so needs a passive income for the next 7 years . What have they got to lose ?

 

[Fadge]

Here’s another one for you Fadge

Who would honestly know when you blokes are serious, and when you're not?

Your delusion has no boundaries.

I mean, you still reflect on 2023 being 'the one that got away....'

 

[Fadge]

Hope they keep him on the list and nurse him through to 500. Blokes got no dough, so needs a passive income for the next 7 years . What have they got to lose ?

If we do, he'll be the first player to notch up 40 wins against a specific opposition club.

Woohoo!

 

[CarmenSandiego]

Who would honestly know when you blokes are serious, and when you're not?

Anyone with the ability to read social cues really.

Your delusion has no boundaries.

Ironic flex considering what we’ve just witnessed from you here.

 

[sr36]

You’re the one who said he’s not good enough to play against the good sides.

Never heard of a club keeping a player on the playing list to intentionally not play big games.

If we get other things right, Scott is a fantastic asset. We're not getting those things right.

Pretty simple Carmy. We were leading at half time in a prelim last year. Yet you seem to think we should have just given it away ... we're trying to keep on rolling, but it's a long shot which is why we cut all our depth to ensure newbies got regular games, but kept our best team. It also ensures young players aren't coming into a mess like what occurs at your Hodge podge of a team and he's generally viewed as the best on-field organiser in the league. Of course we kept him and continue to play him. Champion who can still be a match winner if we're getting things right.

 

[Worm4]

That's the win ratio that Carlton managed when their list peaked after two decades of building and rebuilding.

Poor, pathetic Bloosers.

Tell us again how Collingwood have a win ratio of 50% this year ?

 

[Fadge]

Tell us again how Collingwood have a win ratio of 50% this year ?

4.5 from 9 games ya fool.

As good as win ratio as Carlton have had this century.

Poor, pathetic Bloosers.

 

[sr36]

Tell us again how Collingwood have a win ratio of 50% this year ?

Jeez wormy you're getting desperate when your trying to use some linguistic pedantic shite to suggest that 4 wins and a draw from 9 games isn't 50%.