Remove this Banner Ad

2011 Draft Discussion Part 3

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
What does everybody think the chances are of us picking up both Taylor Adams and Toby Greene? I would have thought quite low considering they are both inside midfielders however they have both been linked to us by Emma Quayle. Say the club doesn't like any of the taller options at both of our picks and decides to go for mids with the first 2 picks who does everybody think they would be? My preference would be Greene and Sumner however Adams and Sumner would be great as well. I can't decide who I like more out of Adams and Greene!
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

What are peoples top 2 choices for 8 and 12 assuming Tomlinson is gone?


Also would Joel Houghton who was delisted by Fremantle worth a look?

FWIW, i Think Tomlinson is the KPP we are after, he seems to fit most of the clues. He would give us depth at either end, we need forwards and backs, so it doesn't matter which end he is best at, we can use him there. He could be there at pick 12, but probably not at 16 or 20 (Kerr mentioned that 12 was a big upgrade for us in the draft). He has also been pretty heavily linked to us. Whilst plenty of players have been, Greene and Tomlinson are the main ones that keep coming up.

To answer the question, Tomlinson is gone at 8, then i think we go someone like Sumner and Greene. Both fit our needs in our mid rotations, and would add something new to the list. However, it might depend how slides.
 
I'm really starting to like the sound of Greene and Docherty with 8 & 12 if Tomlinson is off the board. They both come across to me as having a bit of attitude. Much like what we see in Rockliff. That killer instinct that will push them further than most when the going gets tough. That kick of Docherty is a real weapon too. Can't have too many good kicks in your team ;p
 
What are peoples top 2 choices for 8 and 12 assuming Tomlinson is gone?


Also would Joel Houghton who was delisted by Fremantle worth a look?

I'm really starting to like the sound of Greene and Docherty with 8 & 12 if Tomlinson is off the board. They both come across to me as having a bit of attitude. Much like what we see in Rockliff. That killer instinct that will push them further than most when the going gets tough. That kick of Docherty is a real weapon too. Can't have too many good kicks in your team ;p


^THIS^, although greene and tomlinson sounds nice, would be even happier if we got bolger at 30.
 
I'm really starting to like the sound of Greene and Docherty with 8 & 12 if Tomlinson is off the board. They both come across to me as having a bit of attitude. Much like what we see in Rockliff. That killer instinct that will push them further than most when the going gets tough. That kick of Docherty is a real weapon too. Can't have too many good kicks in your team ;p

I'll be thrilled with Docherty at 12. Hanley and Docherty as our main defensive rebounders is exciting to say the least.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I'm really starting to like the sound of Greene and Docherty with 8 & 12 if Tomlinson is off the board. They both come across to me as having a bit of attitude. Much like what we see in Rockliff. That killer instinct that will push them further than most when the going gets tough. That kick of Docherty is a real weapon too. Can't have too many good kicks in your team ;p

Brett Anderson from Inside Football has us taking Greene and Docherty.
 
I'm curious what people see in Tomlinson. From the descriptions he doesn't play any position really well, but has great athleticism and physical attributes - to me that doesn't sound like a pick 8 candidate.
 
I'm curious what people see in Tomlinson. From the descriptions he doesn't play any position really well, but has great athleticism and physical attributes - to me that doesn't sound like a pick 8 candidate.

Well, I think saying that he doesn't play either position really well is underrating his ability. He's good up forward or down back just not a star in either position yet. There may be Hurley potential in him. The flexibility is very handy because he can fill a hole if, like Brisbane, your club is in need of both KPF and KPD types. It's all relative anyway, it looks like he could very well be pick 7 material so that we can't get him. I don't think Brisbane's recruitment team will buy into Gubby's mind games to much anyway. If he goes at 7 we take Greene at 8 as he fills the need for a classy clearance midfielder and then, at 12, either go tall with a KPP or pick a hardened rebound/clearing defender like Docherty or Ellis. Personally I'd like to see two small/med then see what KPD's are available at 30. That's not what I've said in the past mind you, I keep changing my mind. :p
 
That's it I'm off Him now..

The article seems to gloss over the fact that while WHE's "Magpies link" (his great great grandfather) played 18 games for the Pies, he also played 106 games for Fitzroy, winning two premierships with them...
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.


lol...in his blood...The old WW1, (the big one)...change of name trick......Is karate kicker Chuck Norris a distant relative too?



Will's great-great-grandfather was Charlie Norris, who played 18 games for the Magpies - and in the back pocket for the 1910 premiership side - before crossing to Fitzroy, playing 106 games in eight seasons, and in the 1913 and 1916 flags.



 
Has anyone loved the thought off getting Buntine and Docherty at 8 and 12?

Would love Buntine and Greene... Docherty I don't mind at 12, but I think there may be 1 or 2 still there that are better prospects.

IMO, my top choices (that I see as possible - even though not likely) would be:

Pick 8 - 1. WHE 2. Buntine 3. Tomlinson 4. Greene
Pick 12 - 1. Greene 2. Kavanagh/Adams 3. Kersten 4. Docherty
 
One thing I don't like about some of the KPP players being talked about is that I think they fall into a bit of an in-between box in terms of size. Players in the 190 -193 cm range (eg Tomlinson, Kersten, Haynes) just don't seem to be big enough for modern KPPs, and are generally just a bit too big to slot into the midfield - of course there are exceptions (Fev & Bradshaw to name a couple), but I think they need to be a minimum of 195 -197 cm these days, so I hope there's scope for some more growth in these guys.

I think of blokes like Collier, Cornelius, Lester, Macguire & Karnezis who seem better suited to being second or third tall in the forward or back line. I feel we need some taller KPPs who can pinch-hit in the ruck when our sole ruckman goes down, and hold their own as the number one in the forward or backlines - we are looking for replacements for Brown and Merrett.
 
For those interested Phelan is doing a phantom at 12 today. In past years it was done by Matt Burgen before he left to join a club. I had my complaints with Burgen but I think he had more contacts than Phelan does but still probably worth a look.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top