Remove this Banner Ad

2016 Non-Crows AFL Discussion - Cont. in Part 2 (link in OP)

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
And there's no point not having the range to get to the operational area and be able to stay there a while. Both the German and French bids were good submarines. Impossible to say which is better because neither have yet been built. Don't know if you are correct in saying that the German boat would have been quieter. The French doesn't have a propeller and relies on a different propulsion system to the norm

Yeah. Go Crows, boo Pear. Um, wat? :drunk:
 
And there's no point not having the range to get to the operational area and be able to stay there a while. Both the German and French bids were good submarines. Impossible to say which is better because neither have yet been built. Don't know if you are correct in saying that the German boat would have been quieter. The French doesn't have a propeller and relies on a different propulsion system to the norm
Are you with DFA? or something?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Will Sean Connery be our consulting Captain?

- If this board can't agree on something simple like submarine technology, what hope is there for draft/trade strategies?
We will have to pass through that narrow stretch with precision rather than just go over it.:D
 
I would undertake capital expenditure on a property I was leasing, if there was security around the length of the lease. But I'm not expecting the lease to be free.

Look - a lot of AFL teams would have sweet deals with local councils (there is no mother reason you would train in Seaford), but that doesn't mean it's not an advantageous deal for us.

How is it better than our previous deal?
 
Would the reason no one wants to buy it be because they don't see it sustainable for livestock and margins are too tight?

No, it's because it's being sold as a single parcel so is too expensive for interested parties. There's lots of interest from Australians in purchasing individual portions of it. It's not a single homestead controlling the entire land area, it's many stations and it could easily be divided into economically sound smaller parcels.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

No, it's because it's being sold as a single parcel so is too expensive for interested parties. There's lots of interest from Australians in purchasing individual portions of it. It's not a single homestead controlling the entire land area, it's many stations and it could easily be divided into economically sound smaller parcels.
Thank you. That makes sense. So individually sold. Buyers would still have issues regarding maintaining livestock?
 
I know very little about this but reading between the line, I get the impression the port power deal was a bit of sweetener to butter a few people up.

Bit like, look what I have done for your famous club, now look that way whiles I make a bucket load of money and take it back to Beijing.
Wouldn't surprise me if Port never see a cent of that money and the game next year is canned now.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Thank you. That makes sense. So individually sold. Buyers would still have issues regarding maintaining livestock?

Wouldn't have thought so. Cattle has successfully been run in the most remote parts of Australia for over a hundred years. They know how many they can run with the expected available feed. They would only find themselves in trouble of prices crashed or an unexpected impediment got between them and their market. Most of the water is very reliable from what I understand.
 
Wouldn't have thought so. Cattle has successfully been run in the most remote parts of Australia for over a hundred years. They know how many they can run with the expected available feed. They would only find themselves in trouble of prices crashed or an unexpected impediment got between them and their market. Most of the water is very reliable from what I understand.
Thank you again. My relies are grain farmers and don't rely as much on livestock. I'd imagine it would be hard and arid land and feed would be an expense that is variable as the water.
 
FFS, Damien Barrett is known for one thing - Sliding Doors - and he can't even get that concept right.

Like this from today:

Geelong:
IF

there's a heavy reliance on Joel and Paddy
THEN
so be it. They are machine-like in their abilities to stand up when most needed.

:mad: FFS!!! Do you even know what the concept of sliding doors is you silly fellow? It's if someone had made a different decision or taken a different path, what would life be like? It's fairly simple. Let me illustrate:

Damien Barrett:
IF

he'd paid more attention in English class instead of trying to get the First XVIII captain to notice him
THEN
he wouldn't be one of the worst journalists in the AFL.

See? Not that hard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top