cryptor
Brownlow Medallist
- May 11, 2008
- 23,491
- 58,812
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
My prefernce is O'Meara >> Crouch/Prestia > MitchellSooo.......
O'Meara or Crouch or Mitchell or Prestia?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My prefernce is O'Meara >> Crouch/Prestia > MitchellSooo.......
O'Meara or Crouch or Mitchell or Prestia?
SameMy prefernce is O'Meara >> Crouch/Prestia > Mitchell
Maybe 35,000 of us Hawks members should buy GWS memberships, vote out their board & fill it with our own guys, get our board to sack the footy dept & bring in our own List Manager (not the former poster or various aliases) then trade Shiel, Kelly, Cameron & Lobbe to HFC for a 4th rounder.The only argument posters have against public salaries are
-dont care
-privacy
And they ignore or skirt around all the reasons they should be public (symantecs is skirting). Members elect the board so we control the club.
Do you want another Will Langford or Shiels on the list or would you rather a JO'M or Brad Crouch?I don't understand why some of our supporters are against the club going after Tom Mitchell. He's not that bad a player.
A couple of weeks ago against Geelong he had a career high 21 contested possessions and 20 contested possessions against the Gold Coast Suns about a month ago. Sure he may not have elite kicking skills, but neither does Will Langford or Shiels.
Sooo..Sooo.......
O'Meara or Crouch or Mitchell or Prestia?
You got $7m spare to do that clown?Maybe 35,000 of us Hawks members should buy GWS memberships, vote out their board & fill it with our own guys, get our board to sack the footy dept & bring in our own List Manager (not the former poster or various aliases) then trade Shiel, Kelly, Cameron & Lobbe to HFC for a 4th rounder.
HahahaYou got $7m spare to do that clown?
Don't give a toss!!I don't understand why some of our supporters are against the club going after Tom Mitchell. He's not that bad a player.
A couple of weeks ago against Geelong he had a career high 21 contested possessions and 20 contested possessions against the Gold Coast Suns about a month ago. Sure he may not have elite kicking skills, but neither does Will Langford or Shiels.
Maybe 35,000 of us Hawks members should buy GWS memberships, vote out their board & fill it with our own guys, get our board to sack the footy dept & bring in our own List Manager (not the former poster or various aliases) then trade Shiel, Kelly, Cameron & Lobbe to HFC for a 4th rounder.
That's my pointI don't understand why some of our supporters are against the club going after Tom Mitchell. He's not that bad a player.
A couple of weeks ago against Geelong he had a career high 21 contested possessions and 20 contested possessions against the Gold Coast Suns about a month ago. Sure he may not have elite kicking skills, but neither does Will Langford or Shiels.
Same, but do you understand why we would chase Mitchell?Same
Tom Mitchell doesn't inspire me much
Tom Mitchell is better offense wise than Langford in close for the ball, Shiels better defensively. Also Shiels probably a better kick than both. But Tom Mitchell's hands are elite.Do you want another Will Langford or Shiels on the list or would you rather a JO'M or Brad Crouch?
I reckon that's the question. It isn't that we all hate Mitchell (syd), it's just that most of us would prefer someone else, if both are available (& in BF world, anything is possible),.
Wasn't me likening either of them to Shiels, Moose.Tom Mitchell is better offense wise than Langford in close for the ball, Shiels better defensively. Also Shiels probably a better kick than both. But Tom Mitchell's hands are elite.
I understand though, would rather Jaeger or Crouch than Tom. But yeah got a lot of faith in Woody.Wasn't me likening either of them to Shiels, Moose.
I don't reckon we areSame, but do you understand why we would chase Mitchell?
I'm just dreaming alittle & imagining Rockliff being the ladI don't reckon we are
The primary stakeholder in any club are its members. The board are accountable to the members just as the board members of public companies are to shareholders. Clubs are not however regulated the same in the sense that reporting to members is less onerous than reporting to shareholders and the market. The relevant legislation is really considering your local footy and cricket clubs where the scale is small enough and members close enough to the club operations that board/committee members can be held accountable for the running of the club with little formality.Members do not control the club, they can influence things like the board but it still requires people to want to be on the board. They can influence the bottom line by not renewing or not going to games or not but I G merchandise.
They could kill the club in great enough numbers maybe but they don't own the club.
Prestia.. We can't surely need another smaller player. Lovell should be able to replicate his game if required.
Rockliff is a poor mans Dane SwanI'm just dreaming alittle & imagining Rockliff being the lad