Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2016 Trade Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm struggling to think of a specific example but I feel like in the past we've also used 'sure thing' trades to let us complete other deals while everyone else is speculating on the 'known' deal. Am I making this up?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I'm struggling to think of a specific example but I feel like in the past we've also used 'sure thing' trades to let us complete other deals while everyone else is speculating on the 'known' deal. Am I making this up?
Well last year the howie for Kennedy looked like a straight swap, but it ended up being a 4 way trade which saw toumpas to port and varcoe to Collingwood.
 
I'm struggling to think of a specific example but I feel like in the past we've also used 'sure thing' trades to let us complete other deals while everyone else is speculating on the 'known' deal. Am I making this up?
Happened last year. Big feeling that it was on in 2014 too with the JPK/Danger rumour.
 
Well last year the howie for Kennedy looked like a straight swap, but it ended up being a 4 way trade which saw toumpas to port and varcoe to Collingwood.

Varcoe went to Collingwood with the mitch Clark deal and we got Lumumba
 
Really?
Before we've even really seen what he can be?
I respectfully disagree. If it came to that (which I'm sure it won't), I'd rather see us persist with Salem than take Hibberd for him.

You missed my point, I wouldn't do the deal myself but trading a 26 year old very good HBF for a 22 year old who has missed the best part of 2 seasons isn't a crazy trade from a neutrals perspective
 
You missed my point, I wouldn't do the deal myself but trading a 26 year old very good HBF for a 22 year old who has missed the best part of 2 seasons isn't a crazy trade from a neutrals perspective
Nah I got that you you didn't think we needed to or would do the trade.
I think it's crazy to consider they are worth the same.
Salem is a pick 9 3 years ago and when 2017 starts, he's only 21 and Hibberd is 27 as opposed to 22 and 26. It's a Roosy "2-way swing"
 
Nah I got that you you didn't think we needed to or would do the trade.
I think it's crazy to consider they are worth the same.
Salem is a pick 9 3 years ago and when 2017 starts, he's only 21 and Hibberd is 27 as opposed to 22 and 26. It's a Roosy "2-way swing"

3 years ago and he's been injured for 2 of them, on the open market he would get somewhere between 20-30 which is Hibberd's worth.. thought that's pretty simple

Aish went for pick 21 after being a number 7 draft pick only 2 years later
 
We'll do what we can to maximize value for him, but to be honest I'd happily accept 27 for him.

It's maybe not quite what we'd like, but it's near enough to return the good will of the Melksham trade I think.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

3 years ago and he's been injured for 2 of them, on the open market he would get somewhere between 20-30 which is Hibberd's worth.. thought that's pretty simple

Aish went for pick 21 after being a number 7 draft pick only 2 years later
Aish is a squib though and wanted out so bad comparison.
I would not be swapping a 21yo #9 pick for a 27yo who has missed a full year of football on the piss in Europe, that's simple.
 
Aish is a squib though and wanted out so bad comparison.
I would not be swapping a 21yo #9 pick for a 27yo who has missed a full year of football on the piss in Europe, that's simple.

That's you because your a melbourne supporter and everyone rates their own kids as far better than they are Salem Aish had/has done more in his career than Salem who's played 29 games in 3 years
Like I said I wouldn't do it either but Salems value has not increased since draft day and would be worth roughly the same as Hibberd on the open market

For instance what would you pay for Ben Lennon from Richmond
 
That's you because your a melbourne supporter and everyone rates their own kids as far better than they are Salem Aish had/has done more in his career than Salem who's played 29 games in 3 years
Like I said I wouldn't do it either but Salems value has not increased since draft day and would be worth roughly the same as Hibberd on the open market

For instance what would you pay for Ben Lennon from Richmond
A bag of clothes pegs.
And Hibberd wants out.
 
A bag of clothes pegs.
And Hibberd wants out.

Lennon was pick 12 from the same draft .. that's the point
If we go into a finals series next year Salems all potential while Hibberd's had good best and fairest placings
 
Lennon was pick 12 from the same draft .. that's the point
If we go into a finals series next year Salems all potential while Hibberd's had good best and fairest placings
Yeah look I get your point but for me, Hibberd not having played all year and being 27 and far from a match-winner, I would not even consider trading Salem for.
I know you wouldn't either.
We may sneak into finals next year but realistically, our tilt won't come until 2018-21 where Salem will be 23-27 and Hibberd will be on a walking stick.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I think what you're trying to say Topkent, is that Salem's (and Lennon's) market value is a hell of a lot different to his value to us.

We see a Top 10 pick that has shown promise, but due to injury and illness, he's only played 29 games in 3 years.

Other clubs see a player that has shown promise, but only played 29 games in 3 years.
 
I'm struggling to think of a specific example but I feel like in the past we've also used 'sure thing' trades to let us complete other deals while everyone else is speculating on the 'known' deal. Am I making this up?
I sort of think you may have imagined this but I like it anyway.
 
I think what you're trying to say Topkent, is that Salem's (and Lennon's) market value is a hell of a lot different to his value to us.

We see a Top 10 pick that has shown promise, but due to injury and illness, he's only played 29 games in 3 years.

Other clubs see a player that has shown promise, but only played 29 games in 3 years.

Yeah, a more extreme case is Jaeger Omeara

GC want 2 first round picks because he was incredible in his first season and they took him in the mini draft
Yet no one outside is paying that because they point to his 2 years out of the game
 
Yeah, a more extreme case is Jaeger Omeara

GC want 2 first round picks because he was incredible in his first season and they took him in the mini draft
Yet no one outside is paying that because they point to his 2 years out of the game
Yeah great example ... geez they're absolutely dreaming with 2 Top 10 picks for a kid missing for 2 years from injury, and still not over it.

I was there the day he did it actually, never heard a scream like that on a footy field before.
 
I think what you're trying to say Topkent, is that Salem's (and Lennon's) market value is a hell of a lot different to his value to us.

We see a Top 10 pick that has shown promise, but due to injury and illness, he's only played 29 games in 3 years.

Other clubs see a player that has shown promise, but only played 29 games in 3 years.

(Not taking the piss)

Its this sort of simple clear logic that makes me love this board.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom