They usually go potential top 15 picks just to be safe
But seriously isn't the attendees purely potential Top 10 picks for presentation on stage?
Would have thought Constable would be more deserving than Naish, Richards or Shipley at least
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
They usually go potential top 15 picks just to be safe
But seriously isn't the attendees purely potential Top 10 picks for presentation on stage?
Likely not the final listThey usually go potential top 15 picks just to be safe
Would have thought Constable would be more deserving than Naish, Richards or Shipley at least
True, they’re always names added right up until the last minuteLikely not the final list
Hoo haa will be over Shipley being first 'local' academy player taken ever for GWS
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Agree ......but is it the clubs who nominate a group of players? .....not sure how they formulate the list?They usually go potential top 15 picks just to be safe
Would have thought Constable would be more deserving than Naish, Richards or Shipley at least
Could be how it turns out ......there's always a late bolter, that throws the order out .......Murphy may be that player, but to who?Gut feel says Clark will get taken at 10 to carlton, I think we’ll get Fogarty or Bonar, Brander the smoky.
Pies, Saints or DogsCould be how it turns out ......there's always a late bolter, that throws the order out .......Murphy may be that player, but to who?
Agree ......but is it the clubs who nominate a group of players? .....not sure how they formulate the list?
That's what i thought ......but do they each name 3, 4, or 5 ?Pretty sure clubs in he top 10 nominate a a few players they think they'll be taking with their picks in the top 10, or something along those lines.
Also Kane Farrell at pick 39Knightmare has us taking Constable in his updated phantom on espn.
That's what i thought ......but do they each name 3, 4, or 5 ?
Or supply a list of say top 20 to all clubs, and ask if anyone outside that should be invited .....clubs would be worried about declaring their handYeah, not sure, it may not be a set number, hence why players get invited late as clubs notify the AFL that they may actually end up taking a player not yet invited inside the top 10.
Either that, or the AFL nominate say 15 players and ask clubs to indicate if they should ask any others along.
You've got to be pretty happy with either of those 3 really.Gut feel says Clark will get taken at 10 to carlton, I think we’ll get Fogarty or Bonar, Brander the smoky.
Can't see a 182cm running defender that doesn't defend all that well going that early ( despite being a good kick with speed)Also Kane Farrell at pick 39
Can't see a 182cm running defender that doesn't defend all that well going that early ( despite being a good kick with speed)
From what you say McPherson surely he would be the better bet if looking for that type which I think we might be
Marty will be happy with the SA option at least even though 'each draftee is unlikely to make it '
Or supply a list of say top 20 to all clubs, and ask if anyone outside that should be invited .....clubs would be worried about declaring their hand
I would be okay with it, reckon he can maybe move onto the wing in the future. Could potentially be a shorter Smith-typeCan't see a 182cm running defender that doesn't defend all that well going that early ( despite being a good kick with speed)
From what you say McPherson surely he would be the better bet if looking for that type which I think we might be
Marty will be happy with the SA option at least even though 'each draftee is unlikely to make it '
Tex cooked at 29?Whoever we pick up in this draft won't be playing a single game at AFL level in 2018, nor in 2019 in all likelihood. Mature aged recruits being the exception as Pyke seems to like them.
We need to be thinking of 3+ years ahead with our picks, which is why I would be looking for a KPF with either #12 or 39. In two years time Tex will most likely be just about cooked, so it's not a bad time to start developing a replacement in the SANFL.
Milera played games in his first year, so did Lever, and Matt Crouch, Gooch played a game and will likely play quite a few next year.Whoever we pick up in this draft won't be playing a single game at AFL level in 2018, nor in 2019 in all likelihood. Mature aged recruits being the exception as Pyke seems to like them.
We need to be thinking of 3+ years ahead with our picks, which is why I would be looking for a KPF with either #12 or 39. In two years time Tex will most likely be just about cooked, so it's not a bad time to start developing a replacement in the SANFL.
Whoever we pick up in this draft won't be playing a single game at AFL level in 2018, nor in 2019 in all likelihood. Mature aged recruits being the exception as Pyke seems to like them.
We need to be thinking of 3+ years ahead with our picks, which is why I would be looking for a KPF with either #12 or 39. In two years time Tex will most likely be just about cooked, so it's not a bad time to start developing a replacement in the SANFL.