Analysis 2017 List Management Discussion - Part 3

[Mr_Plow]

I'm a NO to Sumner. Just not physically cut out for AFL.

110%

Doesn't get the ball, doesn't impact the scoreboard, doesn't apply adequate defensive pressure.

Superseded by numerous first year players.

 

[BlueGum]

Think you mean Dicky

Mansplaining

 

[footyfan1978]

My teamboard's up to date (and in my sig) for anyone who needs it. Going to have to construct a HTML version at some stage given how hard they are sunsetting Adobe Flash.

Clicked on and messed about.

 

[1981]

110%

Doesn't get the ball, doesn't impact the scoreboard, doesn't apply adequate defensive pressure.

Superseded by numerous first year players.

And falls over

 

[HARKER]

It may be simplistic, but maybe they just agreed that he wasn't able to contribute so they delisted him. It may receive scorn from the rabble, but it is more sensible to bring in someone who may have only a slight glimmer of hope, than to keep someone who doesn't.

It leaves plenty of argument over why we've kept players too long in the past, or why some players got a 3 year deal instead of 1. But I'm happy it's being done correctly now and hope they continue. I was shocked about White, who always seemed to dodge the bullet, and just expected both Smedts and Boeky to get another 1yr deal, because that's the way it used to be done.

I'm really not sure if player a (Carlton) < player b (Hawks) or player b = player c ,etc, but if we can replace someone on our list, who we have determined cannot serve any purpose in the future, it can only be a good thing. Even if the replacement amounts to nothing, at least we are trying to improve our list. I'd rather that than to keep the fringe players and extend the rebuild into perpetuity.

Which rabble? Isn't it a mistake to have to pay out a player?
We have to remember that we're not only paying out that player, but then also having to pay for someone who'll be taking that list spot.

We may well have some money in the bank, but you don't want to be wasting it on player pay-outs.

 

[Soapy V]

Kind of a cross between Tuohy and Armfield, except a left footer.


I'm thinking we won't touch Stavrou, and we'll be chasing at least one more DFA. Oxley or Clayton might appeal as utilities, but that's just off the top of my head.

They might take a chance on Tom Lamb with a one year deal too.

Not sure he fits the SOS/Bolton good character criteria

 

[My name geoff]

Sydney, Geelong and Collingwood go okay.

I'll give you Sydney and Geelong but Collingwood are very overrated and can GAGF..

In 2018:

Murphy < Pendlebury
Docherty > Sidebottom
Cripps = Treloar
Kennedy < Adams
Charlie > Wells
SPS > DeGoey

 

[1981]

More like he has Armfield's toe poke passes when at full tilt, but he has Tuohy's precision from 50 when he gets the receive (but arguably more accurate, if not as booming a kick).

He's more defensively sound than Armfield, but not as much as Tuohy; he's got Armfield's running capacity, but closer to Tuohy's max pace. None of them are particularly agile, but certainly acceptable from an AFL perspective.


Last year he had to manoeuvre Geelong out of the running to draft Cam.

So he can play?
Averaged 20 game this year

 

[Jimmae]

Not sure he fits the SOS/Bolton good character criteria

Perhaps, but he's arguably worth interviewing.

So he can play?
Averaged 20 game this year

He can, but he's got an awkward running style at times. That's probably what's turned him into a moneyball effort for SOS.

 

[Aphrodite]

Williamson is not ready yet, Docs is and will most likely go into the middle and do very well

scary stuff, not everyone has your opinion

Scary stuff!! It's a forum and not everyone has the same opinion as each other, so toughen up

Must you be repetitive!

 

[Chism]

Happy with the delistings and it is what it is.

No more Simon White has me celebrating honestly and it was a decision made 2 years to late.

 

[Big Taye]

Must you be repetitive!

Yes

 

[Aphrodite]

Yes

No need to attack the same poster at all and why twice.

Play nice thanks!

 

[HARKER]

Happy with the delistings and it is what it is.

No more Simon White has me celebrating honestly and it was a decision made 2 years to late.

I know what you're getting at but one can feel a little different having watched the work Whitey did at our club/for our club.

Decision is right though, as tall defenders aren't exactly something we need. Reckon he may find a way of somehow hanging around.......President?

 

[Chism]

I know what you're getting at but one can feel a little different having watched the work Whitey did at our club/for our club.

Decision is right though, as tall defenders aren't exactly something we need. Reckon he may find a way of somehow hanging around.......President?

Great bloke I agree but we carried him to long on field.

Hope he sticks around for us and maybe works himself into a coaching role but as a an actual footballer I despised him and it was heart in mouth when ever he touched the ball.

 

[bigm386]

Pick 3 (LDU)
Pick 10 (Coffield)
Pick 30 (Fogarty)
Pick 73 (Ryan)
Mullett (DFA)
Stavrou
Sumner
??????
McDaid
Penrith

Hickmott

 

[katmanblue]

Could get used to a few of these, might confuse Mullet and Fish on that raking left peg

Looks good. Whats the knock on him?

On SM-N920I using BigFooty.com mobile app

 

[Big Taye]

No need to attack the same poster at all and why twice.

Play nice thanks!

I was the one who got threatened by that poster, you should get your facts right before you criticise me

 

[Malifice]

Looks good. Whats the knock on him?

On SM-N920I using BigFooty.com mobile app

Limited defensive side.

Poor man's Touhy.

 

[Soapy V]

I was the one who got threatened by that poster, you should get your facts right before you criticise me

Do you post on the CFC supporters facebook page?

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

I was the one who got threatened by that poster, you should get your facts right before you criticise me

You weren't really threatened ... unless bold fonts get you defensive.

 

[Big Taye]

Do you post on the CFC supporters facebook page?

No

 

[newblueo]

ehh yuck picking mullet up.just soft as butterm with white going might be worth a look at collins.

 

[Blues_Man]

Very good if battered & deep fried.

yuk ..they are awful no matter how you cook them

 

[The Old Dark Navy's]

The only objection I've ever heard in regards to cutting a heap of players is the notion that we should replace them through the draft. That was never going to happen. As it stands we will probably end up with 5-6 mature aged players, 4 youngsters in the draft and the rest as rookies.

Not the same as giving 2 year contracts to a few players after 90 in the draft.