LanceRomance
Brownlow Medallist
Big call but I think both Matt Kennedy and Caleb Marchbank will finish top 5 in our b&f this year behind Charlie and Patty.
Ahead of Murph and Daisy?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Big call but I think both Matt Kennedy and Caleb Marchbank will finish top 5 in our b&f this year behind Charlie and Patty.
Thats a fair point. Who knows how good he could have been had he been taught at an earlier age a better action.I can only admire Levi for being a no. 44 rookie pick, getting the most out of himself, and handling being an easy target for a lot of our frustrations of mediocrity.
Thats a fair point. Who knows how good he could have been had he been taught at an earlier age a better action.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Has the tools, needs to feel like he has the ability to use them.
Some people just can't shift that self-doubt, though. I think he may be one of those. And with the volume of talented youngsters we've brought in over the last three years, he may simply be overtaken by those with both the ability and the self-confidence that is required of an AFL footballer.
I'm still hopeful, and quietly confident, that if anyone can get him firing on all cylinders it's Bolton.
Daisy??????Ahead of Murph and Daisy?
he's been ordinary for ever - his dad has vision of him in the birthing suite falling off the delivery table and missing the floorHe kicked fine as a junior.
One of the ol track watchers can back me up here.
My understanding is that Casboult had relatively good set shot goal kicking efficiency as a junior mainly due to him being so dominant in the air, he was basically taking grabs in the goal square. Or so the legend goes..He kicked fine as a junior.
One of the ol track watchers can back me up here.
he's been ordinary for ever - his dad has vision of him in the birthing suite falling off the delivery table and missing the floor
Sydney boasts an AFL-high 17 players rated either 'elite' or 'above average', ahead of Port Adelaide, which has 16 players in the top two categories.
Carlton's list is rated the least talented, while Fremantle has the weakest best 22, with captain Nat Fyfe rated as the club's only 'elite' player.
As per article on afl.com...from champion data
Sydney boasts an AFL-high 17 players rated either 'elite' or 'above average', ahead of Port Adelaide, which has 16 players in the top two categories.
Carlton's list is rated the least talented, while Fremantle has the weakest best 22, with captain Nat Fyfe rated as the club's only 'elite' player.
Like to know how they base that.
As per article on afl.com...from champion data
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-01-16/revealed-the-afls-most-talented-list
Like to know how they base that.
he's been ordinary for ever - his dad has vision of him in the birthing suite falling off the delivery table and missing the floor
Levi's mum hired Sav as a midwife for the next baby....
How many kids we have that havent fully developed is always going to hurt you on champion data dont even read i to itAs per article on afl.com...from champion data
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2018-01-16/revealed-the-afls-most-talented-list
Like to know how they base that.
CD/Afl.com are confusing talent with output. Does SK have more talent than SPS? I don’t think soHow many kids we have that havent fully developed is always going to hurt you on champion data dont even read i to it
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
CD provided output stats to the AFL and that Schmook guy who wrote the article decided those numbers illustrated talent instead. Or perhaps he knew it'd spark some debate and get more traffic across the piece so he deliberately penned a piece that would get a rise out of supporters?CD/Afl.com are confusing talent with output. Does SK have more talent than SPS? I don’t think so
This. Provocative article is provocative.CD provided output stats to the AFL and that Schmook guy who wrote the article decided those numbers illustrated talent instead. Or perhaps he knew it'd spark some debate and get more traffic across the piece so he deliberately penned a piece that would get a rise out of supporters?