It's not like we have 2 years to pick up top line players and then the window closes.The way we move up the ladder is by getting him though. Getting Shiel this year makes Kelly/Coniglio more realistic next year. Right now they're all going elsewhere because there is no sell for a 6-16 side unfortunately. With Shiel and better injury luck we could get an extra win or two and have more of a sell
Next year we'll see more improvement through the return of Doc, Plow & Willo plus Cripps, Charlie, Harry, Kennedy, Fisher, Samo, Weitering, Marchbank, Pickett, Dow, O'Brien, Lang, Garlett, etc (I know I've missed players...) all getting another 9 games and a preseason than purely by adding Shiel, Kelly or anyone else for that matter.
I'm not sure Kelly (or anyone) would look as us at the end of next year and think "geez, I would have liked to go to Carlton but unfortunately they didn't sell the farm in an alleged superdraft so my interest waned". To get Shiel across we'd have to sell him the hope for the future, ie the kids, otherwise why would he nominate us? And surely aren't we better positioned to sell that same hope in a years time if we take our pretty damn good hand to the draft and add to our list?
You're suggesting we trade 1 for Shiel this year and then trade our first (and more) for Kelly next year. If we want those players, aren't we better off to take 1 to the draft and go for Shiel next year as a FA and then trade our first (& something) for Kelly? If it effectively costs the same (picks & dollars) why would you rather have Shiel+Kelly when you can have Shiel+Kelly+Lukosius/Walsh?...





