Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion 2018 Non-Crows Discussion Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who said i'm removed from the Tasmanian situation .....that's your assumption

I think you've come up with conclusions, without a full understanding of a working financial model required
I haven't come up with anything ... These are what Tasmanians I have spoken to (that are at directly involved in Tassie footy) have told me when I have asked them what the solution is.

My reference to you being removed from the coal face of the problem was an assumption on my part based on what you posted. How are you actually connected to this problem? How far from the coal face are you?

giphy.gif
 
Crows have an Academy and run quite a few community sessions.
Both North and Hawthorn run communities session and junior coaching sessions. in Tasmania,

The Tasmanian issue is you have Hobart and Launceston, two different cities, and football organisations who do not see eye to eye, The whole state cannot work together It's like the Hatfield and McCoys. And its runs deeper than Football. Then you have Queenstown
I agree ......however the Academy is simply to develop particular demographic groups ....the Crows have no ability to impact the structure of local footy or participation rates

Queenstown ? ....:p
 
Have never heard you moan about the quality of coffee in Hobart. So we all just presume that you've never been there.
Oh i've spent a great deal of time in Tasmania over many years in a business capacity :sailboat: :camera:
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Basically a local then? Finger on the pulse and all that?
Nah not a local, Melb based ....but work took me there on a regular basis, which is how you see the difference between what people say & what people do
 
Crows have an Academy and run quite a few community sessions.
Both North and Hawthorn run communities session and junior coaching sessions. in Tasmania,

The Tasmanian issue is you have Hobart and Launceston, two different cities, and football organisations who do not see eye to eye, The whole state cannot work together It's like the Hatfield and McCoys. And its runs deeper than Football. Then you have Queenstown
That's incredibly simplistic.

North has done very little in Hobart. It's just been desperate for the cash.

The north-south divide doesn't exist with anyone in Tasmania younger than 40. It's from another time. If there was a Tasmanian team, they would be completely united by it.
 
Who said i'm removed from the Tasmanian situation .....that's your assumption

I think you've come up with conclusions, without a full understanding of a working financial model required

So, you've visited a few times for work. I lived there, and frankly you're wrong.

And enough of your remedial economics discussion. Everyone older than five understands the financial reasons for going into GWS.

Another team is SEQ makes little sense, though. And losing a successful market like Tasmania is an absolute disaster.
 
So, you've visited a few times for work. I lived there, and frankly you're wrong.

And enough of your remedial economics discussion. Everyone older than five understands the financial reasons for going into GWS.

Another team is SEQ makes little sense, though. And losing a successful market like Tasmania is an absolute disaster.
Disaster ? ........that's extreme ......bigger markets to conquer, which have 100 times more economic benefit to the AFL longterm
 
That's incredibly simplistic.

North has done very little in Hobart. It's just been desperate for the cash.

The north-south divide doesn't exist with anyone in Tasmania younger than 40. It's from another time. If there was a Tasmanian team, they would be completely united by it.

I agree they will support 1 team, But Where do you put the Team, Who runs the team. Will a relocated club work Straight away?.
The problem is the under 40 don't run the football in Tasmania. At this time they are there own worst enemies. and need a united front.
Currently, you have a Hobart Push and a Launceston push.
 
I agree ......however the Academy is simply to develop particular demographic groups ....the Crows have no ability to impact the structure of local footy or participation rates

Queenstown ? ....:p
Wondering if anyone would work the reason for adding Queenstown,
Ie years ago the was an Idea put up to make Queenstown the home of an AFL football team because it was not Hobart or Launceston.
It was quietly laughed off never to heard of again.
 
Wondering if anyone would work the reason for adding Queenstown,
Ie years ago the was an Idea put up to make Queenstown the home of an AFL football team because it was not Hobart or Launceston.
It was quietly laughed off never to heard of again.
Queenstown :p

Victor Harbor is bigger & more luscious ......i could understand putting a prison there?

Queenstown02A.jpg
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Disaster ? ........that's extreme ......bigger markets to conquer, which have 100 times more economic benefit to the AFL longterm
Again, just remedial understanding about economic development.

The issues for the brand of the AFL if they let a developed market wither and die while chasing a 30 year growth dream should be obvious.
 
Last edited:

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Again, just remedial understanding about economic development.

The issues for the brand of the AFL if they let a developed market wither and die while chasing a 30 year growth dream should be obvious.
It is ! .......it's about the relative size & worth of each respective market .....that's obvious
 

Decent player with potential, but he's doing his best to piss his career away before it even gets established, let alone being lucky he didn't kill himself and/or someone else by driving drunk.
Obviously doesn't like playing full seasons...
 
It is ! .......it's about the relative size & worth of each respective market .....that's obvious
Most money for clubs comes from the national not local sponsorship. Ie. Promoting brand in a national competition.

The main issue is what crowds would Tasmania get to the game long term. Given they are a parochial footy state, no less than GC or GC.

It makes more sense having a team in Tasmania, than the 9th team in Melbourne.
 
Most money for clubs comes from the national not local sponsorship. Ie. Promoting brand in a national competition.

The main issue is what crowds would Tasmania get to the game long term. Given they are a parochial footy state, no less than GC or GC.

It makes more sense having a team in Tasmania, than the 9th team in Melbourne.
If this were the case, why do clubs go to such great lengths to increase their memberships each year & strive to get crowds at grounds

Fagan has stated a few times, as others, that the relative success of clubs winning footy games, translates to bums on seats, merchandise sales ......and is the difference to us finishing in the black versus the red

Why then push to move from West Lakes to Adelaide Oval, if everything comes from National Sponsorship and AFL Rights Distribution?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top