Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion 2018 Non-Crows Discussion Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
You do realise it is in an annual report?

Head in the sand attitude - your club was a failure financially in the SANFL. It will continue to suck dry other more profitable clubs and why? It’s membership demographic. It is pretty simple to understand but hey only business people understand this. It’s why you have the circuses!

Lol. It reads like a drunken emotive bigfooty rant. Even in the first line there are 2 factually incorrect statements:

"..... 1991 and the creation of Adelaide FC to play in the VFL drained so many players that the SANFL competition was reduced to nine teams. Once again, Woodville FC was folded – this time into its western suburbs neighbor"

Firstly in 1991 it was called the AFL, not the VFL although I suspect VFL was used emotively, secondly Woodville did not fold into anybody, West Torrens folded into them as they were insolvent.

The rest of it is just wishy washy statements, vague correlations and bullshit numbers (Did you know that the Player Retention scheme was the reason Adelaide were able to assemble such a strong team- did ya?)

It's the SAFC Annual Report people, they can write whatever they want because the know only 3 people will read it.
 
Lol. It reads like a drunken emotive bigfooty rant. Even in the first line there are 2 factually incorrect statements:

"..... 1991 and the creation of Adelaide FC to play in the VFL drained so many players that the SANFL competition was reduced to nine teams. Once again, Woodville FC was folded – this time into its western suburbs neighbor"

Firstly in 1991 it was called the AFL, not the VFL although I suspect VFL was used emotively, secondly Woodville did not fold into anybody, West Torrens folded into them as they were insolvent.

The rest of it is just wishy washy statements, vague correlations and bullshit numbers (Did you know that the Player Retention scheme was the reason Adelaide were able to assemble such a strong team- did ya?)

It's the SAFC Annual Report people, they can write whatever they want because the know only 3 people will read it.
Woopty****ingdoo AFL/VFL Torrens/Woodville. Same diff. Point is Port has existed as a parasite since being formed in the 1990’s. Port numpties always trying to bignote their ragtag tin-rattling rabble of a franchise never accept the facts.
 
Lol. It reads like a drunken emotive bigfooty rant. Even in the first line there are 2 factually incorrect statements:

"..... 1991 and the creation of Adelaide FC to play in the VFL drained so many players that the SANFL competition was reduced to nine teams. Once again, Woodville FC was folded – this time into its western suburbs neighbor"

Firstly in 1991 it was called the AFL, not the VFL although I suspect VFL was used emotively, secondly Woodville did not fold into anybody, West Torrens folded into them as they were insolvent.

The rest of it is just wishy washy statements, vague correlations and bullshit numbers (Did you know that the Player Retention scheme was the reason Adelaide were able to assemble such a strong team- did ya?)

It's the SAFC Annual Report people, they can write whatever they want because the know only 3 people will read it.
Talking about an emotive BF rant - where's your facts to dispute the actual content

You and your comrades hilariously puffing "not true !not true !" doesn't make it so.

Might wash with the gullible koolaiders on your board but not here
Without AFC - you don't exist.
Simples
IMG_1368.PNG
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Damn I hate that shitcan franchise.:D
Me too:D
Everything about them just shits me. Colours nickname NTUA Koch 1870 China - they're just so "wannabeish". Always broke - always whining ..... the constant whining and poor cousin syndrome. :poo:

Pathetic really
Although 119 made a lot of it worthwhile :thumbsu:
 
You do realise it is in an annual report?

Head in the sand attitude - your club was a failure financially in the SANFL. It will continue to suck dry other more profitable clubs and why? It’s membership demographic. It is pretty simple to understand but hey only business people understand this. It’s why you have the circuses!

Speaking of annual reports, here's something from Port's 1982 annual report

...and yes, it really is footnote 119.

Captuportre.PNG

I guess that instead of waiting for sanity to be restored, they fell for the VFL's gambit, they jumped in early before $$$ pushed some Vic clubs out of the league... and here we are
 
Was listening to Fiveaa this afternoon and I'm not kidding but Bicks and Rowe rated the new Port leadership group as possibly the best in the comp.

Then they proceeded to mention other players that could be there such as Wingard and Hombsch insisted that they too could slot in without fuss.

Mentioned that due to Ports fantastic culture Dixon and now Rockliff now demand a spot on that leadership group!

Sent from my SM-T355Y using Tapatalk

Rowie giving his usual rimjob to Port fans. He’s got kids and a mortgage after all. I bet he goes home every night and scrubs himself clean with steel wool.
 
Me too:D
Everything about them just shits me. Colours nickname NTUA Koch 1870 China - they're just so "wannabeish". Always broke - always whining ..... the constant whining and poor cousin syndrome. :poo:

Pathetic really
Although 119 made a lot of it worthwhile :thumbsu:

Their colours are woeful. White is boring, teal is for old ladies and their black makes them look like burnt cockroaches who have survived the apocalypse.
 
Their colours are woeful. White is boring, teal is for old ladies and their black makes them look like burnt cockroaches who have survived the apocalypse.
Then you got the Prison Bars bullshit - the OneClub garbage .....moronic supporters
There's a million reasons the thought of them makes me sick up a bit

But then again
The Primus years were pretty good :thumbsu:
 
Talking about an emotive BF rant - where's your facts to dispute the actual content

You and your comrades hilariously puffing "not true !not true !" doesn't make it so.

Might wash with the gullible koolaiders on your board but not here
Without AFC - you don't exist.
Simples

View attachment 457753

The irony!
 
The irony!
Fact
You should have been relocated years ago
Your crowds are dropping 2000 a year on average
That means in ten years you're back to Footy Park numbers

I'm patient

Although this was pretty good
IMG_1369.jpg
 
Last edited:
upload_2018-2-8_16-51-35.png
So who is heading to this fun filled day?
This is what I imagine the program for some sort of apocalyptic cult / Scientologist brainwashing, give us all of your money convention day would look like.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

View attachment 457775
So who is heading to this fun filled day?
This is what I imagine the program for some sort of apocalyptic cult / Scientologist brainwashing, give us all of your money convention day would look like.
Apparantley no phones or recording devices allowed in the room.

But must bring a pair of white Nikes.....

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 
View attachment 457775
So who is heading to this fun filled day?
This is what I imagine the program for some sort of apocalyptic cult / Scientologist brainwashing, give us all of your money convention day would look like.
Any smart young entrepreneurs here ?? Go set up a Kool-Aid stall out the front and you will make a killing !!
 
Speaking of annual reports, here's something from Port's 1982 annual report

...and yes, it really is footnote 119.

View attachment 457754

I guess that instead of waiting for sanity to be restored, they fell for the VFL's gambit, they jumped in early before $$$ pushed some Vic clubs out of the league... and here we are
Note 120 was prescient

Claremont

Despite lacking the “enforcer” needed to win many flags under pressure, between 1979 and 1994 Claremont played in the finals every year bar 1985 and 1992, and under Gerard Neesham’s extremely innovative coaching methods and “chip and draw” style, they won twenty and drew one of their last 21 games in 1987. Neesham’s skill was such that Claremont reached five successive grand finals for three flags despite the loss of most key players to the VFL (later AFL).

After 1994, Claremont’s fortunes declined somewhat, and financial difficulties threatened their existence in the middle 1990s. However, at WAFL level they managed to remain competitive throughout the 1990s and 2000s if never threatening for a premiership until 2004, when they were thrashed by Subiaco in the grand final, a fate which befell Claremont again in 2005 from South Fremantle.
 
View attachment 457775
So who is heading to this fun filled day?
This is what I imagine the program for some sort of apocalyptic cult / Scientologist brainwashing, give us all of your money convention day would look like.
Session 10 at least shows optimism and direction
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

KT on Sportsday SA now saying new joint major sponsor “hopefully” a few months away

Kochie said 3 weeks 3 weeks ago

Currently having some “discussions”
This week we were told, THIS WEEK!!!
 
wrong ...

when we announced Renault it was in March ..... so their I still plenty of time ... so chill have a beer and watch the grand final again ...

errr ... we have a major sponsor ..
Watch 2007 again

Oh

source.gif
 
I think he means the SANFL GF

I have watched that a few times.
:D:D Whats better than watching Port get beat by 119 points

Watching them get beat by 1
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top