Opinion 2018 Non-Crows Discussion Thread

[Kane McGoodwin]

My fav was that the victim should have to go to counciling and not SPP

It's rather sad some (not all!) Port posters feel the need to defend/deflect poor behaviour by blaming the alleged victim, media, Crows supporters... anyone else but SPP... when the bottom line is that it was unprofessional for SPP to be out after midnight getting blind drunk.

SPP should never have put himself in this situation as a professional footballer & needs to take responsibility that his actions are the sole cause of this mess. I don't agree with media headline grabbing sensationalising as much as they can, but the bottom line is they would not have had this opportunity if SPP didn't put himself in this situation in the first place.

I would be furious if this was a Crows player & would be criticising them not defending them!

 

[Geoffa32]

Release the CCTV footage that Caro says shows SPP did not so has the alleged victim claims.

If they don't do that any findings the AFL/Port come to will be dodgy.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Release the CCTV footage that Caro says shows SPP did not so has the alleged victim claims.

If they don't do that any findings the AFL/Port come to will be dodgy.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Given the seriousness of what has been alleged, it makes absolutely no sense if you were wrongly accused to not release footage that would clear your name.

Many won't believe the PAFC if they clear him on the basis of footage they refuse to release, because it will appear to be a cover-up, regardless of what actually did happen.

 

[jo172]

I suspect the exonerating video is with the video of the Crows Fan abusing Ryder at the Showdown.

Entirely fictional

 

[Geoffa32]

Given the seriousness of what has been alleged, it makes absolutely no sense if you were wrongly accused to not release footage that would clear your name.

Many won't believe the PAFC if they clear him on the basis of footage they refuse to release, because it will appear to be a cover-up, regardless of what actually did happen.

Exactly. It also makes the alleged victim look a liar and I believe her identity has been uncovered on Facebook.


I fully expect the AFL and Port will clear him.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[Wood_Duck]

This photo shows Sam Powell Pepper not sexually assaulting anyone. Comprehensive proof it didn't happen.

 

[Deaneus!]

This was UFC 202. Diaz fought McGregor (Diaz may be a bus manufacturer, i don't know). The terrible, terrible tag lines include "Any Weight"

202 Days to go until Wines is out of contract. is Ollie thinking of shifting to UFC so he can be Any Weight he wants?

Why Hasn't He Signed Yet?

 

[Deaneus!]

This photo shows Sam Powell Pepper not sexually assaulting anyone. Comprehensive proof it didn't happen.

I swear to God, if i was at home i'd have photosh00ped this in such a way as to introduce a woman's skirt by now

 

[Thetrader15]

Port are running with the "CCTV footage clears him but we don't want anyone to watch it because reasons" line? Seriously?

No doubt trying to protect the victi...err, woman involved

 

[chazwazza]

Same. I spent 30 straight hours making this gif for Doc_ then it dissapeared!





Well, 10 minutes. But still.

Driving to work today I thought a video of SPP’s head imposed over Bill Clinton’s Lewinsky testimony would be good, or over Alan Bond’s “I have no recollection of those events”

 

[WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot]

The Lost 12 hours.

For a moment I thought I had started drinking again but I woke up feeling fine

Ok, I'm not going crazy. Good to know.

 

[Geoffa32]

The Lost 12 hours.

For a moment I thought I had started drinking again but I woke up feeling fine

SPP's defence?

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

 

[relapse]

This photo shows Sam Powell Pepper not sexually assaulting anyone. Comprehensive proof it didn't happen. #Portlogic

IFIFY

 

[SugarShane]

I prefer Sam Powell Pervert

Sam Assault&Pepper?

(Allegedly)

 

[FR0GGY]

Same. I spent 30 straight hours making this gif for Doc_ then it dissapeared!





Well, 10 minutes. But still.

That’s exactly what I had done!

 

[StickerMan]

For those playing at home:

 

[fabs33]

The Lost 12 hours.

For a moment I thought I had started drinking again but I woke up feeling fine

I have no recollection of what I did during those twelve hours, but like SPP I know I didn't do anything wrong.

 

[Elite Crow]

Can we make this guy PM?

 

[AFC3000]

You know a cover-up is about to happen when the president re-tweets something like this on day two of the investigation...

 

[footy4ever]

Y

Can we make this guy PM?

Or at least leader of SA Labor party.

No sponsor for you port!

 

[StickerMan]

Notice the PAPs have gone to ground and are a little less chirpy when you start bringing in some facts....

 

[AFC3000]

Can we make this guy PM?

Of course they didn't offer up more money, and to the Port supporters who think you have two major sponsors, lose one, and still have one major sponsor... that's not really how it works, you had two halves of a major sponsor, lost one half, and now have half of one.

Port wasn't going to run around with a blank jumper, they wouldn't admit to the failure, why would Oak pay for something that was never going to cost them anything.

We'll know they lied if they ever add a second major sponsor while the current Oak deal exists, no one will question it though.

 

[AFC3000]

Notice the PAPs have gone to ground and are a little less chirpy when you start bringing in some facts....

Whatever the ratings were, it would be like when, no offense to anyone, but when the hockey or something is on free to air here. Yes, enough people will leave their TVs on for it to rate something, but who is really watching... who actually cares...

So with China's population, you could put, I don't know, a stamp-licking competition on tv and you would still have 10 million people not tune out.

 

[subaru]

Port are running with the "CCTV footage clears him but we don't want anyone to watch it because reasons" line? Seriously?

If they go the inconclusive line without airing it, then it's absolutely conclusive and damning

 

[fabs33]

Of course they didn't offer up more money, and to the Port supporters who think you have two major sponsors, lose one, and still have one major sponsor... that's not really how it works, you had two halves of a major sponsor, lost one half, and now have half of one.

To be more precise Port had two halves of a SMALL major sponsor. Renault's contribution didn't amount to much more than one sixth of our major sponsor's own contribution.