Seems easier and lower risk to just say we don't need AFL ambassadors anymore -> I mean, i don't even know who they actually are, meaning they do very little for the endorsement of the game.
Particularly when according to Gil, "The highest-paid ambassadors – three of the top four, I think – are with Melbourne clubs."
Just seems like more snouts in the trough again
Surely in a cash poor environment, you'd do both. Both are very easy to implement, sure, ambassadors is a strike of the pen and the potentially dealing with a breach of contract claim, but definitely something you'd look hard at. Collecting $300k from a couple of entry points at AFLW games would take no more than a 1 hour meeting with a subcontractor who would be highly experienced in delivering that service.





