I managed to keep all our players on AFL Evolution 2020 PS4 so I don't see why it should be that hard tbh.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
People do understand that when re-signing a player the impact on the cap is the difference between what they were paid and what they will be paid, yeah.
For instance if Cripps is on $600 now and we re-sign him for $800 it increases our TPP by $200 only.

I know that the AFL explicitly wanted in the software that front loading couldn't see the scenario above of $1m, $1m, $375k. They would allow in extreme cases for it to be allowed. But Jack Martin walking in the PSD wouldn't be one of those where we'd get approval for his contract to more than half.
My feel for the room in the cap is that there isn't the extra $800k a year we need for Walsh and McKay when there is in 2022 at least $1.7m set aside for Martin ($600k), Williams ($600-750k) and McGovern ($500-700k) and we already have to bring spend down by $600k. It's basic math reduce by -$600k (cap back to 100%) whilst increasing by $800k (Mckay and Walsh) means we have to find $1.4m on our current spend.
As I've said many times now, $500-600k at best from the front ended main two recruits. Leaves us $800-900k to find. Retirements should net another $300-400k. Leaving us $400-500k short. That's the grey area that could very well be doable with massively front ended savings coming from Docherty, Charlie, Marchbank, Plowman, Weitering etc. There's about 8 guys that could fit into that category that we need to have their 2022 base salary reducing by $50-100k on top of the big 2 well publicised front end deals.
Hopefully SOS has sorted it out and there isn't a massive cap squeeze. But for now it is a big watch this space. Not to mention the extra $800k we'd be giving to McKay and Walsh is about $500k short of what they would be able to get if they left. You don't want any sort of pressure on the cap when you're not that close to the top 4. You don't mind it if you're in the 8 and within touching distance.
That still wouldn't change what's owed in 2022 would it. C'mon dude you must be taking the piss.RE: Why we have to find room in 2022 for Walsh:
Because we will like to get his contracted sorted before he goes into his final year
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Seen someone on Twitter say Cripps has signed a 4 year deal on $850k not sure where this coming from, but if true is a great result. Still makes him very well paid but should allow us to sign H without too much trouble.
Cripps will remain a blue for next 4 years ..
The biggest recruiting mistake we made at the time was not going really hard after Tom Mitchell. Now there is talk Hawthorn may trade him to restart their rebuilding. Geez we would want to throw everything to get him. if Paddy has to be traded to a WA club for draft picks, then so be it. Consistent 30-40 plus possession getters are hard to find..
SPS most likely at Freo
Dow maybe off to Richmond...
I think Dow to Richmond probably is from the same line of thinking as:Giving up Cripps for Mitchell , If i was a Carlton fan i would burn the joint down Cray move cripps is 10 times the player mitchell is with his 40 dinky give take possessions.
Where did you get that from ?
Last year on another Richmond forum a richmond supporter with connections mentioned this, Something along the lines of the family asked the question from carlton and were told not possible.
Richmonds midfield is ageing so bringing in a young talent like Dow is a worthwhile gambleI think Dow to Richmond probably is from the same line of thinking as:
Carlton/Norf should get the other McKay
Carlton should draft Henry Walsh
Carlton/Geelong should get the other De Koning
Saints/Suns should get the other King
Let's get both the Swallow's together
etc
You've already got one, surely you'd want another! Why not both?!
Seen someone on Twitter say Cripps has signed a 4 year deal on $850k not sure where this coming from, but if true is a great result. Still makes him very well paid but should allow us to sign H without too much trouble.
Richmonds midfield is ageing so bringing in a young talent like Dow is a worthwhile gamble
4 years @ $850k is a very reasonable and good deal for the club...especially in this era where lots of gun players receiving contracts of 6+ years.
Bit hard to judge since Cripps' form hasn't been great for 18 months now...but he is still important as our captain and we can't forget just how much he carried us before 2020. Hopefully he gets over his back issue and can return to form.
That still wouldn't change what's owed in 2022 would it. C'mon dude you must be taking the piss.
they need a one way runner replacmeent for dusty eventually thoHonestly don't think Dow is a 'Richmond type of player'. They only draft strong runners who spread and apply defensive pressure...their entire gameplan is based off it.
They just got rid of a fullforward, seriously doubt they will pay $10m for Harry. they need to focus on their mid field first. Once Goldstein & Cunnington leave they are stuffed.Which is why i am a little worried they could make a god father offer to H. If i am head of list management at North I am giving Harry a 10 mil, 8 year contract and tying him up with his brother long term as the key pillars for their rebuild.. How they would get the trade done is interesting, but they would have the PSD threat..
Mitchell would be a great fit at Richmond to replace Cotchin who is probably in his last year..Giving up Cripps for Mitchell , If i was a Carlton fan i would burn the joint down Cray move cripps is 10 times the player mitchell is with his 40 dinky give take possessions.
Where did you get that from ?
Last year on another Richmond forum a richmond supporter with connections mentioned this, Something along the lines of the family asked the question from carlton and were told not possible.
I think Dow to Richmond probably is from the same line of thinking as:
Carlton/Norf should get the other McKay
Carlton should draft Henry Walsh
Carlton/Geelong should get the other De Koning
Saints/Suns should get the other King
Let's get both the Swallow's together
etc
You've already got one, surely you'd want another! Why not both?!
They remains me of us abit. They have used 5 top 12 picks in the last 5 years on mids, add pick one this year and they probably should have their midfield set but I wouldn’t bet on it.They just got rid of a fullforward, seriously doubt they will pay $10m for Harry. they need to focus on their mid field first. Once Goldstein & Cunnington leave they are stuffed.
Hmm, Geelong with a geriatric list, sure give him up for Murphy...Get your point
But, we should absolutely do everything we can, to get Sam De Koning, his going to be an absolute gun..
Can play KPD, KPF & Ruck
They remains me of us abit. They have used 5 top 12 picks in the last 5 years on mids, add pick one this year and they probably should have their midfield set but I wouldn’t bet on it.
We didnt miss out... Remember we got 1st pick over the over 21s.. What a joke of a priority pick that was, cant even remember who we took thats how valuable they were.Really can't comment on North as haven't watched one of their games this year..
But, you build the spine first.. As it takes the longest to develop, then put the talent around them...
If I was North, I'd look at trading Pick one for multiple top ten picks..
Also if North get a priority pick, after decimating their own list, not even winning a spoon in past 5 years and only just becoming uncompetitive..
Then the AFL is f@#$ed and we should be taking it further, because we missed out with a worse record..
From the Bluemour thread. I've quoted it bellow...
They won't, afl reserves priority draft picks and other special favours for their sponsored favourites: GC, GWS, Brisbane, Sydney. North are viewed same as Carlton - on their own no matter what.Really can't comment on North as haven't watched one of their games this year..
But, you build the spine first.. As it takes the longest to develop, then put the talent around them...
If I was North, I'd look at trading Pick one for multiple top ten picks..
Also if North get a priority pick, after decimating their own list, not even winning a spoon in past 5 years and only just becoming uncompetitive..
Then the AFL is ****ed and we should be taking it further, because we missed out on PP with a worse record..
North doing badly makes it easier to punt them down to Tassie full time. They will get no favours from the AFLThey won't, afl reserves priority draft picks and other special favours for their sponsored favourites: GC, GWS, Brisbane, Sydney. North are viewed same as Carlton - on their own no matter what.