They are facts. As if I could be arsed providing footnotes on a BigFooty post.
But anyway:
There are 14 charts here to show the Black/White wealth inequality is as high as 1968
They are facts. As if I could be arsed providing footnotes on a BigFooty post.
But anyway:
There are 14 charts here to show the Black/White wealth inequality is as high as 1968. Is 14 good enough????
I'm so confused by your position. You are providing evidence of the inequalities that lead to the creation of BLM so despite you suggesting otherwise you seem to be well aware of at least one of the things the cause is fighting for. Is it just that you think BLM should already have made significant progress in two years??? Like seriously?? Is it your contention that because things haven't changed profoundly two years into a movement a group of people should vote for someone who is very clearly racist?
What are you actually saying??








