Discussion 2021 Player X v Y v Z

[1989]

Lyons v Neale
Edwards v Bramble

Have currently gone L. Jones to Edwards, Weightman to Lyons, leaving 122K and 7 trades.

 

[Jiska]

Bolton vs Martin vs Dangerfield?

Danger

 

[cotter101]

Which one to Neale?

Boak vs Taranto

 

[ForeverHardcore]

Which one to Neale?

Boak vs Taranto

Neither
Depends how strong the rest of your lines are and how many trades you have left

if you have 22 premos a sideways/luxury is fine
If not though I would wait on Neale

 

[cotter101]

Neither
Depends how strong the rest of your lines are and how many trades you have left

if you have 22 premos a sideways/luxury is fine
If not though I would wait on Neale

Aside from waiting 1 more week for Danger which I already have the cash for then the rest are luxury trades for me now.

 

[ForeverHardcore]

Aside from waiting 1 more week for Danger which I already have the cash for then the rest are luxury trades for me now.

Tough one
Take out boaks 160 and 120 from round 1/2
He’s averaging 99 in a 10 game stretch since then
So underneath Taranto

so on recent form it would be Boak out

 

[rocker_oz33]

Tough one
Take out boaks 160 and 120 from round 1/2
He’s averaging 99 in a 10 game stretch since then
So underneath Taranto

so on recent form it would be Boak out

I only just got Boak.

Already got buyers remorse, can I reverse my trade..
Please pump out another 160.

 

[cotter101]

Personally, might wait a week and see how Boak/Taranto score and see if Neale backs it up too.

 

[rocker_oz33]

Personally, might wait a week and see how Boak/Taranto score and see if Neale backs it up too.

Boak plays at home Vs Swans I fully expect him to tonne up.
Pretty sure hes avg 27 touches this year.

I expect Neale will score 120s with ease for the rest of the year.

 

[Andrew Birch]

If Reeves comes back in this week, which 1 to start on-field?

Reeves v CCJ v SP Treacy

 

[Barnzy]

If Reeves comes back in this week, which 1 to start on-field?

Reeves v CCJ v SP Treacy

If Reeves plays as the No.1 ruck and Ceglar is dropped the answer is Reeves.

If he plays with Ceglar then I'll be going CCJ.

 

[Andrew Birch]

If Reeves plays as the No.1 ruck and Ceglar is dropped the answer is Reeves.

If he plays with Ceglar then I'll be going CCJ.

That makes sense. Cheers mate.

 

[A Bit Dusty]

If Reeves comes back in this week, which 1 to start on-field?

Reeves v CCJ v SP Treacy

You must have really gone hard to go up in the rankings but it worked well done. I take it you plan on getting Grundy back?

 

[Andrew Birch]

You must have really gone hard to go up in the rankings but it worked well done. I take it you plan on getting Grundy back?

6 trades and 120k bank. Yes, I plan to roughy Grundy, next week probably.

 

[A Bit Dusty]

6 trades and 120k bank. Yes, I plan to roughy Grundy, next week probably.

I was having a look at your team who will you trade out to get Grundy?

 

[Andrew Birch]

I was having a look at your team who will you trade out to get Grundy?

I'm 1k short of doing Heppell > Grundy this week which is fine. I could easily do that trade next week though via a Laird move to the mids and Haynes move from D7 to D6. Ideally Cripps would be the Mid to make way, but I will fall short of that sideways unless Grundy drops a ton of cash this week.

The other option is to use 2 trades. For example LJones > L Edwards (via Sharp to D8) this week & D7 Haynes > Grundy NEXT week. Or if I wait until Rd17 I could probably do CCJ > Grundy.

 

[Jiska]

6 trades and 120k bank. Yes, I plan to roughy Grundy, next week probably.

That’s NOT a roughy you fraud

Judd_Magic

 

[Judd_Magic]

That’s NOT a roughy you fraud

Judd_Magic

 

[Andrew Birch]

That’s NOT a roughy you fraud

Judd_Magic

WTF how isn't it a roughie? I started with him then traded him out then back in. Just for the record I would have traded him out even if he wasn't injured as it was a tactical halving move, not an injury react move.

 

[Jiska]

WTF how isn't it a roughie? I started with him then traded him out then back in. Just for the record I would have traded him out even if he wasn't injured as it was a tactical halving move, not an injury react move.

You still traded him out when he was injured

 

[Andrew Birch]

You still traded him out when he was injured

View attachment 1161230

 

[A Bit Dusty]

Should've gone NicNat you would be in 1st now and $50k richer

 

[Andrew Birch]

Should've gone NicNat you would be in 1st now and $50k richer

NicNats Rd14 bye wouldn't have helped me. Trading Grundy to Whitfield in Rd13 net me 120k, plus 35 points that week as Whitfield's score got a 40 out of my 18. It also allowed me to move Treacy on-field as he was stuck at F7 (i had 6 premo fwds playing that round) and was able to move him to R2 and collect his 95 points which booted another 40 out of my 18. Then in Rd14 Whitfield scored 125 where i managed to field 18. That was the main reason for trading Grundy out for a Rd12/13 player because if 2 out of LJones, Reeves and Waterman didn't play rd14 I wouldn't have been able to field 18 even with 4 trades. Granted I could have picked a better trade for Grundy than Whitfield, but his points, plus Treacy 95 on-field, plus the upgrades I was able to make with the cash from that sideways trade net me an extra 300+ points last week that i wouldn't have had if I didn't trade him out. Using the 2 extra trades on trading Grundy out and back in is/will have turned out reasonably well imo.

 

[No eye deer]

NicNats Rd14 bye wouldn't have helped me. Trading Grundy to Whitfield in Rd13 net me 120k, plus 35 points that week as Whitfield's score got a 40 out of my 18. It also allowed me to move Treacy on-field as he was stuck at F7 (i had 6 premo fwds playing that round) and was able to move him to R2 and collect his 95 points which booted another 40 out of my 18. Then in Rd14 Whitfield scored 125 where i managed to field 18. That was the main reason for trading Grundy out for a Rd12/13 player because if 2 out of LJones, Reeves and Waterman didn't play rd14 I wouldn't have been able to field 18 even with 4 trades. Granted I could have picked a better trade for Grundy than Whitfield, but his points, plus Treacy 95 on-field, plus the upgrades I was able to make with the cash from that sideways trade net me an extra 300+ points last week that i wouldn't have had if I didn't trade him out. Using the 2 extra trades on trading Grundy out and back in is/will have turned out reasonably well imo.

Well there’s thirty seconds of my life I’ll never get back…..

 

[Andrew Birch]

Well there’s thirty seconds of my life I’ll never get back…..

It was a reply to someone else, not sure why you'd even waste your time reading it let alone commenting on it.