giantroo
Bleeding Blue and White
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
No list spots availableso what is the reason for GC wanting to get rid of so many of there picks. 19,22 and potentially 3?
Have a salary cap squeeze and on top of that literally don’t have the list spots to take players right nowso what is the reason for GC wanting to get rid of so many of there picks. 19,22 and potentially 3?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Of all the clubs struggling for players to delist, GC wouldn't have been my first guess.No list spots available
You’d think so, also the way the article made it sound was that Hawthorn was already knocked backSo, if it was suns that approached us, and we're after their gift of pick 19 and not their pick 3 like hawthorn, that would probably put us ahead?
Good to hear you're hanging in there.Fine with the CCJ trade dragging out as it makes our PSD threat real
Should try prioritise getting the Macpherson and pick 19 deal done ASAP tho
Is it worth giving up number 1 pick in next year draft to land 3?I can't see GC giving up pick 3... well, I can't see a normal club giving up pick 3.
Is it worth giving up number 1 pick in next year draft to land 3?
Is it worth giving up number 1 pick in next year draft to land 3?
Its what happens when you lock shiite players away to longer contracts then what you should (player retention)Of all the clubs struggling for players to delist, GC wouldn't have been my first guess.
Sent from my SM-A908B using Tapatalk
Is it worth giving up number 1 pick in next year draft to land 3?
Any truth in the rumour Vossy has sounded out Fevola to come out of retirement?Crazy Vossy lives!
Hard no. The top 10 next year is projecting to be stronger than this year's top 10.
Souup what "theoretically" would be your top 10 for next year?Hard no. The top 10 next year is projecting to be stronger than this year's top 10.
Mahony had better up his numbers. As should a number of others
That makes a lot of sense. As a small forward, he tries hard undoubtedly but he's held back by a serious lack of pace. Doesn't have the slipperiness and magic skills that the role requires. But you can cover that to some extent in the midfield if you're a quick thinker rather than a quick mover (Cunners, Sam Mitchell, Cripps, T Mitchell etc etc)I have a little bit of second-hand ITK with Jack. What I have heard is that the coaches are extremely happy with his progress and the role he is playing. Longer-term they would like to see him develop into an inside mid. Need to remember he was the youngest player in his draft year and still hasn't turned 20 yet.
That makes a lot of sense. As a small forward, he tries hard undoubtedly but he's held back by a serious lack of pace. Doesn't have the slipperiness and magic skills that the role requires. But you can cover that to some extent in the midfield if you're a quick thinker rather than a quick mover (Cunners, Sam Mitchell, Cripps, T Mitchell etc etc)
I just assumed it would be with a prolific goal kicker because then he would be considered more of a mid.It's been clear all year that he's playing a pressure forward role, and everything else has been secondary. He got repeated plaudits from Noble and others in the club for how well he was playing that role. When our forward line started to function better in the second half of the year, I think a lot of that was because of his pressure. It's easy to take a player like that for granted if you don't see the link between Zurhaar or Larkey kicking big bags and the guy who's making life hell for the defenders by smashing them every time they try to transition the ball.
Even then, he had games like the one against Richmond where he showed signs of being extremely effective as a traditional small forward. Consider the fact that he's just turned 20, isn't anywhere close to his peak as a player and will keep building his fitness, strength and skills. At this stage his spot is not available, if he's going to be replaced it'll be with a player who has that same ability to generate pressure acts in and around the arc, not a prolific goal kicker.
Tracking and top speed data from games would indicate otherwise.That makes a lot of sense. As a small forward, he tries hard undoubtedly but he's held back by a serious lack of pace. Doesn't have the slipperiness and magic skills that the role requires. But you can cover that to some extent in the midfield if you're a quick thinker rather than a quick mover (Cunners, Sam Mitchell, Cripps, T Mitchell etc etc)
Did you catch up with this morning news buddy.
I was 12 hours ahead of any news outlet reporting that Hawks interested in the suns pick 19 and salary dump.
Back in your hole.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Thanks for the insight.I have a little bit of second-hand ITK with Jack. What I have heard is that the coaches are extremely happy with his progress and the role he is playing. Longer-term they would like to see him develop into an inside mid. Need to remember he was the youngest player in his draft year and still hasn't turned 20 yet.