Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
"Brodie Grundy... my mail, from a number of sources now, will not be at Collingwood next year," Rocky said on Dead Set Legends with Tom Rockliff, Cal Ferguson and Thomo.what does it say?
More likely than us, with Lycett 30 this year and Hayes not exactly setting the world on fire in his absenceGrundy to Port?
"Brodie Grundy... my mail, from a number of sources now, will not be at Collingwood next year," Rocky said on Dead Set Legends with Tom Rockliff, Cal Ferguson and Thomo.
"They’re happy to part ways with him… my understanding is he wants to stay in Melbourne, but is there a pull to get him home South Australia as well?"
On SM-G988B using BigFooty.com mobile app
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
It’s funny that you are going on one game when the team losing and yet give Hamish’s boys lots of leeway. It’s almost as if you have a man crushHow's Josh Carmichael looking for the Pies today, I see the Roos are in front looking at the scores?
Hopefully to Port as he would blow up their cap & looks to be past it.More likely than us, with Lycett 30 this year and Hayes not exactly setting the world on fire in his absence
Pies would be paying a fair chunk. If we could trade ROB direct swap and take Grundy at what ROB is getting paid I would do that deal every day of the week.Hopefully to Port as he would blow up their cap & looks to be past it.
Surely Port are not stupid enough to take on Grundy's contract...
Collingwood have form regarding part payments. I suspect they'd have done their sums.Hopefully to Port as he would blow up their cap & looks to be past it.
Surely Port are not stupid enough to take on Grundy's contract...
Not sure Port need him they have an ELITE ruckman with CharlieHopefully to Port as he would blow up their cap & looks to be past it.
Surely Port are not stupid enough to take on Grundy's contract...
From what I had been told Turner nominated 6 months and Carmichael 18 months. So I would assume due to the situation we are in with tight list spots we went with the player we rated with 6 months. Not sure if that's verified or not though but just what I had heard after they were drafted.Presumably we felt that we could only take one pick due to list numbers at the end of season, and the limited number of out of contract players.
We rated Turner higher than Carmichael. So we drafted him.
Tight for list spots? We could delist about a dozen on our list without giving it a second thought, and barely notice or care that they were gone.From what I had been told Turner nominated 6 months and Carmichael 18 months. So I would assume due to the situation we are in with tight list spots we went with the player we rated with 6 months. Not sure if that's verified or not though but just what I had heard after they were drafted.
How many of those would be out of contract? I think we have just about the least amount of out of contract players in the comp at the moment because we've signed up pretty much everyone. There will obviously be a few delistings but probably only enough to accommodate three picks in the draft and then we may trade a player.Tight for list spots? We could delist about a dozen on our list without giving it a second thought, and barely notice or care that they were gone.
That makes no sense then to take an injured player, who is only now playing his second SANFL game with so few games of the season left.From what I had been told Turner nominated 6 months and Carmichael 18 months. So I would assume due to the situation we are in with tight list spots we went with the player we rated with 6 months. Not sure if that's verified or not though but just what I had heard after they were drafted.
I think you have to look at the actions of the Club ....not the words of a Coach, asked to make a public statement on one of his players![]()
Probably looking at pick 50 or a 3rd round pick upgrade
The final, final, final, final piece of the puzzle.Grundy to Port?
If that's the reasoning, we really are run by a bunch of absolute morons.From what I had been told Turner nominated 6 months and Carmichael 18 months. So I would assume due to the situation we are in with tight list spots we went with the player we rated with 6 months. Not sure if that's verified or not though but just what I had heard after they were drafted.
Hopefully it’s also to receive a better trade rather than being shown as kicking him outI think you have to look at the actions of the Club ....not the words of a Coach, asked to make a public statement on one of his players
Crouch can see the writing on the wall .....and at 27, it's now or never, to get himself a trade & reasonable Contract
I'm certain that's part of the rationale behind playing Crouch ....better for both parties, at season's end, if Crouch is playing AFL and not SANFLHopefully it’s also to receive a better trade rather than being shown as kicking him out
Yeah you can delist those that are contracted if you fulfill their contractual agreement in doing so. How many are actually out of contract?Tight for list spots? We could delist about a dozen on our list without giving it a second thought, and barely notice or care that they were gone.
This is where Reid falls down in my opinion.Yeah you can delist those that are contracted if you fulfill their contractual agreement in doing so. How many are actually out of contract?