List Mgmt. 2022 Trade & List Management Thread II

[giantroo]

Spoiler: Confirmed Trades

Spoiler: Draft Pick order

AFL Draft - AFL.com.au

Australian Football League. All the latest AFL news, video, results and information

www.afl.com.au

Spoiler: Key dates

AFL Trade Period Key Dates - AFL.com.au

When does Free Agency begin? How long does the Trade Period go for? Find out on AFL.com.au.

www.afl.com.au

Key Dates:

Friday 07 October at 5.00pm
Close of AFL Restricted Free Agency Offer and Unrestricted Free Agency Period.

Monday 10 October
NAB AFL Draft Nominations open (9am)
AFL Restricted Free Agency Matching Offer 3 Day Period Ends (5pm)

Wednesday 12 October at 7.30pm
AFL Trade Period closes – players and selections


Thursday 03 November at 9.00am
AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (1) commences

Wednesday 09 November at 5.00pm

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (1) closes

Friday 11 November at 9.00am

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (2) commences

Tuesday 15 November by 5.00pm

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (2) closes
AFL Trade Period closes – selections only

Monday 21 November by 3.00pm

NAB AFL Draft Nominations close

Monday 28 November at 7.10pm

2022 NAB AFL Draft Round One (Venue TBC)

Father/Son, Academy & NGA and Players Bidding opens.

Tuesday 29 November

AFL Trade Period – selections only (5.45pm to 6.30pm)

2022 NAB AFL National Draft Round two until completion (7pm)

Rookie Upgrade Period opens (10pm)

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (3) commences (10pm)

Rookie Upgrade Period closes (11pm)

AFL Delisted Player Free Agency Period (3) closes (11pm)

Wednesday 30 November

NAB AFL Pre-Season Draft (3pm, online)
NAB AFL Rookie Draft (3.20pm, online)

Thursday 01 December by 4.00pm

Final AFL Club List Lodgement

 

[Roosurgence]

I’m not sure why we haven’t just gone to Port and told them don’t even bother until you have moved on a player to get the necessary capital.

Why start involving other clubs to accomodate their wishes to not have to trade a player.

I swear if Rawlings does any deal like this and comes out and claims we want to be known as good to deal with, the club will be getting a nasty email from myself.

 

[Roo202]

Can someone please kidnap Brady Rawlings and hide him until next Wednesday after the Trade period has closed.

He single handedly could put this club into a black hole for the next 5-10 years.

Surely this is all being fed to the media from Port and anyone else set to benefit from these proposed scenarios. The fact we are getting screwed over worse and worse in each iteration is only because no one at North is giving the media anything.




Hopefully

 

[Lomas]

I reckon we should save the melts for after the deal gets done

Where is the fun in that?

 

[Sphynx]

West Coast I would assume would take Cadman if they keep pick 2. With Kennedy retiring their key forward stocks are worse than ours.

Pick #1 may be a lot more valuable in 2 days when Cadman tests.

We are in no rush to do this.

If he’s grown and his athletic numbers stack up…

 

[Ashley B]

Quality is the key

 

[Roosurgence]

I reckon we should save the melts for after the deal gets done

Definitely but these reported deals are not sounding encouraging.

He got butt****ed last year when he held leverage and now it looks like history repeating itself.

 

[Sphynx]

Way i read it
Out : JHF, pick 1
IN : 2 & 3, Port F1

1 vs 2 basically net zero

So its JHF for 3 and port F1

Which is what brady said all along. Two firsts one being a top 5.

Clearly list managers prepared to forego cadman for two bites of wardlaw, tsatas, sheezel.

1 vs 2 is not a net zero.

Is Callaghan worth the same as JHF?

 

[Tas]

This is just North giving things away for free so everyone else can get what they want. It doesn't need to be some stupid six way trade (to state the obvious), Port just need to give up a bit more to get JHF, then we do a deal with GWS afterwards if we want.

I know we likely aren't stupid enough to do it, but I'm always a little terrified we will when I read these.

Well, Brady has shown he is... both Brown and CCJ trades were god awful, but I am hoping Viney is smart enough.

 

[Roosurgence]

Pick #1 may be a lot more valuable in 2 days when Cadman tests.

We are in no rush to do this.

If he’s grown and his athletic numbers stack up…

Even if we didn’t want Cadman why give up Pick 1 to make the deal easy for Port.

 

[Usayed Givashe]

Reid 201cm when he was 16, might grow a bit more, good below his knees. There are about 5 really good forwards at this stage, Moir can easily kick 50+ on either foot.

I am not sure how Cadman stacks up against them but... there is no guarantee a future pick lands in that zone next year anyway.

Wrong Reid buddy. Ours is about 186

 

[Ashley B]

Why do we want to trade away both our pick one’s bizarre JHF and the newbie. Why do you think every club is going helter skelter to get them, they are valuable and we already own them , they are top quality.

 

[Tas]

Wrong Reid buddy. Ours is about 186

Wut? 2023 draft Archer Reid.

 

[domiroo]

Logan ****ing MacDonald all over again .

 

[Roosurgence]

Why do we want to trade away both our pick one’s bizarre JHF and the newbie

I actually have no confidence that Rawlings actually knows how to negotiate.

 

[Harris 10]

JHF got 8 and a future 1st
Pick 1 for 3 and 12

Is shite, but it’s still better than the crap they’re talking about now.

 

[roos_fanatic08]

Way i read it
Out : JHF, pick 1
IN : 2 & 3, Port F1

1 vs 2 basically net zero

So its JHF for 3 and port F1

Which is what brady said all along. Two firsts one being a top 5.

Clearly list managers prepared to forego cadman for two bites of wardlaw, tsatas, sheezel.

That’s dogshit for us.

JHF for pick 3 and Port F1 is okay. But……Wheres the benefit of trading down pick 1 for 2?

I’d be wanting one of GWS Future 1sts and one of their late first rounders this year if that’s the case.

 

[giantroo]

 

[Tas]

Even if we didn’t want Cadman why give up Pick 1 to make the deal easy for Port.

I wouldn't believe everything you read, they also said we were after Bonner just because Port want to jettison him.

 

[JGreezy]

Way i read it
Out : JHF, pick 1
IN : 2 & 3, Port F1

1 vs 2 basically net zero

So its JHF for 3 and port F1

Which is what brady said all along. Two firsts one being a top 5.

Clearly list managers prepared to forego cadman for two bites of wardlaw, tsatas, sheezel.

1 and 2 might functionally be a net zero if our guy isn't Cadman, but we need something else for that move.

I think we need 2, 3, Port F1 and Hunter Clark.

 

[Usayed Givashe]

Wut? 2023 draft Archer Reid.

Harley Reid.

Archer is good too, but Harley is the Freak.

 

[Deleted member 98541]

In what world is the guy who was Pick 1 last year and pick 1 this year = 2,3 and future first ( probably outside the top 5).

True. When u put it like that it sounds shit.

We should have 2,3, port F1 and Clarke as a minimum.

 

[Tas]

Harley Reid.

Archer is good too, but Harley is the Freak.

Pretty sure the conversation was about key forwards and Cadman vs 2023 prospects... or I might be drunk on shit 10-way trades.

 

[Sphynx]

Wut? 2023 draft Archer Reid.

He’s talking about Harley Reid who is like if Luke Hodge had a love child with Dustin Martin.

 

[Deleted member 98541]

1 and 2 might functionally be a net zero if our guy isn't Cadman, but we need something else for that move.

I think we need 2, 3, Port F1 and Hunter Clark.

Was thinking the exact same thing.

Need a hird to step in for Hinkley and disqualification of premiership points

 

[Psicosis]

Is it just me or does GWS wanting Cadman show that we should definitely keeping 1 and drafting him…


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

All you gotta look at is the Giants drafting vs ours. Combine that with the fact we have a third of a recruiting dept, it’s pretty clear we should be taking him.