Remove this Banner Ad

Resource 2025 AFL Draft prospects and discussion.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

You’re mixing up genuine ticks with key forwards. Not sure why, I’m clearly referring to key forwards and have consistently done so. And you inferring incorrectly isn’t my fault, I’m bored with you now, you don’t seem to understand the difference between a ruckman and KPF. What’s the point of discussing with people who refuse to understand such a fundamental difference. Take it as a win if you want, you probably need it.

Lol weak cop out response. “I’m not capable of explaining, so I’ll pretend like I’m letting you win”

I understand the difference but there is still some crossover in the pros cons in having an extra one in the team.

Why don’t you explain why a team is more likely to win a premiership with 2 talls forwards and 2 ruckman than a team with 3 tall forwards?

if you don’t want to play any of the guys I mentioned, then you must think we to go recruit a second genuine ruck to play along side ROB, yes?
 
Lol weak cop out response. “I’m not capable of explaining, so I’ll pretend like I’m letting you win”

I understand the difference but there is still some crossover in the pros cons in having an extra one in the team.

Why don’t you explain why a team is more likely to win a premiership with 2 talls forwards and 2 ruckman than a team with 3 tall forwards?

if you don’t want to play any of the guys I mentioned, then you must think we to go recruit a second genuine ruck to play along side ROB, yes?
Agree with your thought process

AFL Clubs copy styles of winning teams .....until a Club is bold enough to play to its own list strengths

Everyone points to the RICH model of one KF, with a fleet of small in their FWD line .....but by Hardwick's own admission, it was purely thru necessity (no other KF's) not by any design
They then brought in Tom Lynch to get back to a more traditional FWD line

There is no issue with playing to your list strengths .....many teams have had 3 key FWD's, West Coast most notably .....however they do have to be mobile, which is why the finger gets pointed at Tex as the weak link

After his retirement, or forced management ....having mobile players like Curtin and Dawson resting as 3rd Talls, will be a plus, not a negative
 
He looks small, slow, and his kick max's out at 30 mtres .....plus he doesn't protect the ball
Not sure why we would use a SSP selection on a player that was not drafted in a weak draft.

SSP selection is best used on a delisted or state league player that we want to give an opportunity to - like a Keays
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Zac Foot turns 25 in December and had a huge season for Southport, including 3 quality performances in finals. It would make a lot of sense for him to be the “midfield run” train-on prospect referred to by Reid - in fact, it makes far too much sense when combined with the mickfaxis info for it to not be the case.

I don’t mind it - has a bit of a Tim Kelly when the Cats picked him up feel to it. He’s got a lot of tricks and a lot of swagger and is ready to go.

As a general principle, we could do worse than trying to replicate the Cats model of picking mature age talent that is ready to go. Tom Stewart. Tim Kelly. Shaun Mannagh. Lawson Humphries. Absolute monsters with regularity being plucked down there.


I actually really like him and hope he's the one we've asked to train on.

Some of his games against quality VFL opposition were just massive, especially against a stacked Brisbane team. He won Southport's B'n'F and I'm pretty sure, according to his Insta made the VFL Team of the Year. He has explosiveness and kicks a lot of goals for a mid, something we haven't had for who knows how long.

Another Ben Keays, Mitch Hinge success story would be a great win.

Finger's crossed he's the guy.
 
Not sure why we would use a SSP selection on a player that was not drafted in a weak draft.

SSP selection is best used on a delisted or state league player that we want to give an opportunity to - like a Keays
I'm struggling to see how TM fills a need .....agree on a State League player or a DFA as a preference

I think we know how this will end
 

This is so disappointing

Haven’t we learnt from the recruitment of Patrick Parnell ?

Running ability, kicking efficiency and stats are useless if a player doesn’t have the size to compete

Yes he’s small now, however looks to have a body type that will struggle to put on size

Meh - ordinary decision
 
Ben Crocker vibes
 
Nicks has said the team needs more speed and power in the midfield and across HB

How the **** does Tom McGuane address this need….

Tom played for Collingwood VFL this year and struggled at that level - was the key reason why the Pies and probably every other club over-looked him

This is so ****ing Hamish - continues to waste lost spots
 

What is it with this club and their love for short a$$ weasels under 175cm? why not give EH a chance, bring him over or go tell him to play VFL, if he performs, stays clean and behaves that we will pick him the mid-season draft? surely there is a better prospect than Mcguane we could look at that is 185cm-190cm that plays midfield?
 
Was Mcguane ever ranked in the last 2 years to be a first round/high draft pick? was he ever talked up? i cant remember. did he ever have potential or was he just mentioned cos he is the son of?
 
I don't think its fair to compare to Parnell or Murphy cos in his highlight videos he looks much more talented than those two. But he is not we need!

 

Remove this Banner Ad

I don't think its fair to compare to Parnell or Murphy cos in his highlight videos he looks much more talented than those two. But he is not we need!


Mate - talent means **** all when your built like a whippet

The modern game requires a player to have at least one or a combination of these attributes to compete - size, power and or speed

McGuane has none of these attributes- talent can’t rise if you can’t compete physically
 
Mate - talent means **** all when your built like a whippet

The modern game requires a player to have at least one or a combination of these attributes to compete - size, power and or speed

McGuane has none of these attributes- talent can’t rise if you can’t compete physically
Nick Watson? i guess he has speed? still a whippet and has no size
 
Nicks has said the team needs more speed and power in the midfield and across HB

How the **** does Tom McGuane address this need….

Tom played for Collingwood VFL this year and struggled at that level - was the key reason why the Pies and probably every other club over-looked him

This is so ****ing Hamish - continues to waste lost spots
I wasn't aware we had given him a list spot, do you know something we don't?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Nick Watson? i guess he has speed? still a whippet and has no size
You absolutely can be small, but you need to have uber elite traits to make up for it.

Watson, Betts have not just speed but elite agility and smarts on another level to make up for the small size.

We seem to pick small guys with mediocre skills with no real elite traits at all.

This is what I don't understand at all.
 
You absolutely can be small, but you need to have uber elite traits to make up for it.

Watson, Betts have not just speed but elite agility and smarts on another level to make up for the small size.

We seem to pick small guys with mediocre skills with no real elite traits at all.

This is what I don't understand at all.
McGuanne is a very good user both by hand and foot, not sure where you got that mediocre skills from?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Resource 2025 AFL Draft prospects and discussion.

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top