- Mar 14, 2011
- 22,362
- 113,988
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
- Other Teams
- Leeds united, Chicago Bulls
I think it was the max hall interview on 7What's this meant to be? It's not loading
Can’t remember now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I think it was the max hall interview on 7What's this meant to be? It's not loading
Yep there isn't a real clear solution to this trade, as some have suggested it could get ugly
Honestly I've got no idea. I'm worried the club would be far too keen to give away our 26/27 futures if they can. Which I suspect will be decent picks based on Ports current list profile
I don't see a nice way through this without Butters being involved in some way
Imagine going after a top 5 player in the comp whilst having not planned for it by building up trade assets and having a stupid fan base that demands any good player is an untouchable.Yep there isn't a real clear solution to this trade, as some have suggested it could get ugly
Honestly I've got no idea. I'm worried the club would be far too keen to give away our 26/27 futures if they can. Which I suspect will be decent picks based on Ports current list profile
I don't see a nice way through this without Butters being involved in some way
Imagine going after a top 5 player in the comp whilst having not planned for it by building up trade assets and having a stupid fan base that demands any good player is an untouchable.
Magic beans won’t get you very far.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I mean if Butters wants to leave (hypothetically) isn't it best for your mob to trade him this year for max value? I know you can force a trade via restricted free agency, but seems like would be cleaner this year.
For the sake of discussion
You could say the same about how St Kilda fans are trying to play down Butters value recently too.
Let's not kid ourselves, Butters has been one of the best players in the competition for the past 3 years.
How do you rationalise that he is suddenly worth so much less than Nas?
In my opinion, nas and Butters are now at very comparable trade values. They are both probably top 5-10 players in the comp. So you're really spliting hairs at this point.
The only thing that gives Butters slightly more value is that he's in contract, and he has displayed he can play at this elite level for a few years now
As for the post above that claimed Nas is worth 2x Butters.. I simply have no words
If I recall correctly, Tom Morris said that both Adelaide teams were quite unprepared for this
I believe the general consensus must have been that he would stay at the Saints for the foreseeable future
So, you are in here trying to achieve what?If I recall correctly, Tom Morris said that both Adelaide teams were quite unprepared for this
I believe the general consensus must have been that he would stay at the Saints for the foreseeable future
So if we could just speak to Everything we would know. So maybe Tony knows Everything?
Gone
Could be wrong but pretty sure Port have to use a first round pick this year before even using any for Nas - and they don’t have one.Yeah, but Doggies only have 10+28, that wouldn't be enough for Butters and on-traded wouldn't be enough for Nas so still a very tough deal to do. Maybe they give you 10+28+2026R1 and you give us 10+26+28+2026R1 (Dogs)+2026R1 (Port) but given both of you would be expected to do well in 2026 with your new acquisitions, can't see those R1 picks being valued super highly.
If I recall correctly, Tom Morris said that both Adelaide teams were quite unprepared for this
I believe the general consensus must have been that he would stay at the Saints for the foreseeable future
If we want a very early pick I think we need to get West Coast involved. They'll have picks 1 and 2 after the Allen compo, and you'd think pick 2 would be on the table for multiple young players / established talent, especially in this draftYeah, but Doggies only have 10+28, that wouldn't be enough for Butters and on-traded wouldn't be enough for Nas so still a very tough deal to do. Maybe they give you 10+28+2026R1 and you give us 10+26+28+2026R1 (Dogs)+2026R1 (Port) but given both of you would be expected to do well in 2026 with your new acquisitions, can't see those R1 picks being valued super highly.
It will be ironical if he goes to Port cos this whole affair is certainly tearing us apartBeen trying to lay low on here the last few days, but honestly if he goes (which I don’t expect) **** him. We get to add a massive haul to a list brimming with talent and we will outperform port for the next decade.

But it won’t. Despite nas being the player he is now, he can’t move our needle to top 8, let alone top 4 and our list significantly deeper than ports.It will be ironical if he goes to Port cos this whole affair is certainly tearing us apart![]()
He’s improving our team 10-20% by himself so where that needle finishes up depends on the rest of the players.But it won’t. Despite nas being the player he is now, he can’t move our needle to top 8, let alone top 4 and our list significantly deeper than ports.
Well we have to fill in our time somehow.There seems to be a lot more discussion or even acceptance that Nas is leaving?
..
How will they be decent picks with Tassy coming in? Ain’t going to get it done.Yep there isn't a real clear solution to this trade, as some have suggested it could get ugly
Honestly I've got no idea. I'm worried the club would be far too keen to give away our 26/27 futures if they can. Which I suspect will be decent picks based on Ports current list profile
I don't see a nice way through this without Butters being involved in some way
In other news … RTB & AB might be about to have a win.
And, the ruck rules and sub rule are about to chamge massively in his favour. I reckon we have read the tea leaves perfectly on this oneCarlton fc are a rabble, so no incentive for TDK-cassettes & tapes to play at his best.
Next year he will fully offload on his talent & become the no.1 ruckman in the league.
At his best, he has what we need, great tap ruckman, strong contested marking & aggression at the contest.
And only 26 y.o, so still has 7 to 8 years to play out.
It's more the reassurance it gives that the deal isnt dead.I don't know how anyone can expect Tony to know anything when the coach clearly doesn't. It's actually ludicrous.