- Oct 3, 2015
- 2,553
- 11,755
- AFL Club
- Carlton
You might be right. I certainly hope you are. 8 losses in 10 games has me thinking though.I am reminded of the uselessness of the oft repeated saying in AFL circles, 'don't get beaten by what you know.'
Shane Warne in his early days used to do at least one if not multiple clinics, in which he'd show people what he could bowl and how he did it. He did it everywhere he went, but it didn't seem to help anyone play him all that much.
Plenty of people 'knew' how to beat Hawthorn during their three premiership run; shut down their short play, forcing them long and down the line as after Buddy and Hale retired they didn't have options for contested marking down the line, and work through Gibson and place a pacy FF on Lake who could beat him on the lead. Legspeed was also pretty effective against them if you could win the clearances, as is evident by Richmond's multiple victories against them in that patch, too. But knowing how to beat them is genuinely half the battle; you've got to have the cattle to do it, gotta turn up on the day, got to have either the gameplan embedded or be very good at changing those gameplans on the fly.
Plenty of teams 'knew' how to defeat the Bulldogs in 2016. Plenty of teams 'knew' how to defeat Richmond between 2018 and 2020. Knowing how to beat teams does not equal being able to consistently beat them.
I am just so, so sick of AFL analysts treating the sport like it's basketball, or soccer, or like it's rugby or gridiron. Footy is different.
Knowing how to beat someone does not entail that it's doable. It's trite, vapid, insipid analysis posing as sagest insight.
It's popcorn masquerading as caviar.




