Remove this Banner Ad

List Mgmt. 2025 Trade/FA Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't imagine so. I can't imagine the afl looking kindly at that sort of thing.
I think the players can afford that sort of thing themselves with what they get paid.
If we can argue that massage and physio is a necessary part of the job (and thus players don’t need to pay out of pocket), then why couldn’t specialised meal plans and food preparation fall under that too?

They can’t play well without the right body and the right fuel.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

I was sipping my lunch smoothie and pondering something…

The salary cap is obviously a limiter in managing a list and we know it’s fairly inflexible. Every club is moreorless paying their roster the same amount of money.

Then we have clubs like Geelong (and probably other clubs) giving their players non-cash financial aid.

I wonder what other strategies clubs have to garner an advantage over their rivals?

I was thinking about the fact that we can’t really pay players more past a point, but we can have them ‘work’ less. Maybe it was part of Nick’s contract that he got a longer pre-season? Maybe Mihochek has an RDO this week? Maybe some players are given ‘days off’ to work from home every so often - even if it amounted to a 5-day work week over the year?

Is the club allowed to provide other services which essentially buffer player salaries? Childcare? Provision of food? Buy the players appliances like TVs, laptops, phones and call it a necessary piece of work equipment?
Player brand management. If a club can grow a player’s brand then perhaps they can sign for less so less goes to the cap?
 
would love to get him, doubt he'd be cheap. but i think he'd be worth it, especially to Pies with the way we play
They just don't have a spot for him in defence. I think their salary cap is fairly full also. There's a bit of bargaining power there for us
 
Last edited:
Just a quick question.
If your 1st pick is round 3 in the draft, and you lose a top player in free agency which gives you band 1 compensation, does that end up being end of 1st round?
 
Just a quick question.
If your 1st pick is round 3 in the draft, and you lose a top player in free agency which gives you band 1 compensation, does that end up being end of 1st round?
Good question.
Yeah, I imagine that would be the case. End of first round.
 
Just a quick question.
If your 1st pick is round 3 in the draft, and you lose a top player in free agency which gives you band 1 compensation, does that end up being end of 1st round?
If it were the top tier of compensation, it would be immediately after the pick your ladder position would’ve given you. Doesn’t matter what picks you actually hold.

If you finish 18th and get the compo, but traded your first couple rounds of picks, you’ll still get Pick #2.
 
Just a quick question.
If your 1st pick is round 3 in the draft, and you lose a top player in free agency which gives you band 1 compensation, does that end up being end of 1st round?
No, it's the pick after your natural pick - as though you hadn't traded it.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Tonight’s game has done nothing but strengthen my opinion that we should be neck deep in to bringing Richards in as a free agent. His first half in particular was stellar, going head to head with Nick.
 
Richards was impressive tonight. 5 clearances, with 4 from the centre.

LDU would still be my preference, as I think he has a better inside/outside skillset than Richards. Depending on price though, Richards may be a better acquisition if we're looking to bolster other areas of the field.
 
Tonight’s game has done nothing but strengthen my opinion that we should be neck deep in to bringing Richards in as a free agent. His first half in particular was stellar, going head to head with Nick.
We have no one besides Daicos with Richards’ speed who can play mid. Would be an excellent acquisition, for sure.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

We could easily find someone better than Dean or Frampton around the state leagues, and our tall depth is extremely poor.
Dean was our attempt at that a couple years ago and he’s seen as a spud now.
 
Richards was impressive tonight. 5 clearances, with 4 from the centre.
It's a shame we couldn't manage any sort of trade when Richards was a bit on the outer at the Dogs some years back.

Who knows..........maybe he's determined to stay at the Dogs , but we certainly should be testing the waters and putting something serious in front of him at the end of the year. Time to come home :p
 
Leek Aleer, Wade Derksen & Oscar Allen should be our targets from a KPP point of view.

Richards, LDU & Rowell from a midfield point of view.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Tonight’s game has done nothing but strengthen my opinion that we should be neck deep in to bringing Richards in as a free agent. His first half in particular was stellar, going head to head with Nick.
It strengthened mine that we need to urgently find another KPD… I’m not sure whether it’s Reef, but damn it would have been good to at least find out and the poor bugger deserved to shoot his shot in 2025. With Aleer on the outer it has to be him.
 
Last edited:
With McInnes horribly doing his ACL, more likely, we could have possibly 3 players on the LTI list.
McInnes, AJ and possibly Titch, should he not have any other setbacks....
There's a possibility we could take 3 picks into the MSD!....🤔
 
I was sipping my lunch smoothie and pondering something…

The salary cap is obviously a limiter in managing a list and we know it’s fairly inflexible. Every club is moreorless paying their roster the same amount of money.

Then we have clubs like Geelong (and probably other clubs) giving their players non-cash financial aid.

I wonder what other strategies clubs have to garner an advantage over their rivals?

I was thinking about the fact that we can’t really pay players more past a point, but we can have them ‘work’ less. Maybe it was part of Nick’s contract that he got a longer pre-season? Maybe Mihochek has an RDO this week? Maybe some players are given ‘days off’ to work from home every so often - even if it amounted to a 5-day work week over the year?

Is the club allowed to provide other services which essentially buffer player salaries? Childcare? Provision of food? Buy the players appliances like TVs, laptops, phones and call it a necessary piece of work equipment?
This is what Geelong does.
The players get a lot more autonomy, do their own vision sourcing, set more of their own hours, Scott lets them have more self determination.
I think it works because the only other thing to do in Geelong is hang out at Jezzas farm.

Have also been told by a club official that they expect to find nothing untoward in Geelongs salary cap investigations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom